Source author record

Michael Kompatscher

Michael Kompatscher appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.LO Computational Complexity Logic in Computer Science math.CO math.GR

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works

5topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2021arXiv

When symmetries are not enough: a hierarchy of hard Constraint Satisfaction Problems

We produce a class of $ω$-categorical structures with finite signature by applying a model-theoretic construction -- a refinement of the Hrushosvki-encoding -- to $ω$-categorical structures in a possibly infinite signature. We show that the encoded structures retain desirable algebraic properties of the original structures, but that the constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) associated with these structures can be badly behaved in terms of computational complexity. This method allows us to systematically generate $ω$-categorical templates whose CSPs are complete for a variety of complexity classes of arbitrarily high complexity, and $ω$-categorical templates that show that membership in any given complexity class cannot be expressed by a set of identities on the polymorphisms. It moreover enables us to prove that recent results about the relevance of topology on polymorphism clones of $ω$-categorical structures also apply for CSP templates, i.e., structures in a finite language. Finally, we obtain a concrete algebraic criterion which could constitute a description of the delineation between tractability and NP-hardness in the dichotomy conjecture for first-order reducts of finitely bounded homogeneous structures.

preprint2016arXiv

A complexity dichotomy for poset constraint satisfaction

In this paper we determine the complexity of a broad class of problems that extends the temporal constraint satisfaction problems. To be more precise we study the problems Poset-SAT($Φ$), where $Φ$ is a given set of quantifier-free $\leq$-formulas. An instance of Poset-SAT($Φ$) consists of finitely many variables $x_1,\ldots,x_n$ and formulas $ϕ_i(x_{i_1},\ldots,x_{i_k})$ with $ϕ_i \in Φ$; the question is whether this input is satisfied by any partial order on $x_1,\ldots,x_n$ or not. We show that every such problem is NP-complete or can be solved in polynomial time, depending on $Φ$. All Poset-SAT problems can be formalized as constraint satisfaction problems on reducts of the random partial order. We use model-theoretic concepts and techniques from universal algebra to study these reducts. In the course of this analysis we establish a dichotomy that we believe is of independent interest in universal algebra and model theory.

preprint2016arXiv

A counterexample to the reconstruction of $ω$-categorical structures from their endomorphism monoids

We present an example of two countable $ω$-categorical structures, one of which has a finite relational language, whose endomorphism monoids are isomorphic as abstract monoids, but not as topological monoids -- in other words, no isomorphism between these monoids is a homeomorphism. For the same two structures, the automorphism groups and polymorphism clones are isomorphic, but not topologically isomorphic. In particular, there exists a countable $ω$-categorical structure in a finite relational language which can neither be reconstructed up to first-order bi-interpretations from its automorphism group, nor up to existential positive bi-interpretations from its endomorphism monoid, nor up to primitive positive bi-interpretations from its polymorphism clone.

preprint2015arXiv

$2^{\aleph_0}$ pairwise non-isomorphic maximal-closed subgroups of Sym$(\mathbb{N})$ via the classification of the reducts of the Henson digraphs

Given two structures $\mathcal{M}$ and $\mathcal{N}$ on the same domain, we say that $\mathcal{N}$ is a reduct of $\mathcal{M}$ if all $\emptyset$-definable relations of $\mathcal{N}$ are $\emptyset$-definable in $\mathcal{M}$. In this article the reducts of the Henson digraphs are classified. Henson digraphs are homogeneous countable digraphs that omit some set of finite tournaments. As the Henson digraphs are $\aleph_0$-categorical, determining their reducts is equivalent to determining all closed supergroups $G<$ Sym$(\mathbb{N})$ of their automorphism groups. A consequence of the classification is that there are $2^{\aleph_0}$ pairwise non-isomorphic Henson digraphs which have no proper non-trivial reducts. Taking their automorphisms groups gives a positive answer to a question of Macpherson that asked if there are $2^{\aleph_0}$ pairwise non-conjugate maximal-closed subgroups of Sym$(\mathbb{N})$. By the reconstruction results of Rubin, these groups are also non-isomorphic as abstract groups.