BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Michael J. Daniels

Michael J. Daniels appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
MethodologyApplicationsMachine Learningstat.OT

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Bayesian nonparametric approach for causal inference with multiple mediators

Mediation analysis with contemporaneously observed multiple mediators is an important area of causal inference. Recent approaches for multiple mediators are often based on parametric models and thus may suffer from model misspecification. Also, much of the existing literature either only allow estimation of the joint mediation effect, or, estimate the joint mediation effect as the sum of individual mediator effects, which often is not a reasonable assumption. In this paper, we propose a methodology which overcomes the two aforementioned drawbacks. Our method is based on a novel Bayesian nonparametric (BNP) approach, wherein the joint distribution of the observed data (outcome, mediators, treatment, and confounders) is modeled flexibly using an enriched Dirichlet process mixture with three levels: the first level characterizing the conditional distribution of the outcome given the mediators, treatment and the confounders, the second level corresponding to the conditional distribution of each of the mediators given the treatment and the confounders, and the third level corresponding to the distribution of the treatment and the confounders. We use standardization (g-computation) to compute causal mediation effects under three uncheckable assumptions that allow identification of the individual and joint mediation effects. The efficacy of our proposed method is demonstrated with simulations. We apply our proposed method to analyze data from a study of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia (VAP) co-infected patients, where the effect of the abundance of Pseudomonas on VAP infection is suspected to be mediated through antibiotics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Inference for BART with Multinomial Outcomes

The multinomial probit Bayesian additive regression trees (MPBART) framework was proposed by Kindo et al. (KD), approximating the latent utilities in the multinomial probit (MNP) model with BART (Chipman et al. 2010). Compared to multinomial logistic models, MNP does not assume independent alternatives and the correlation structure among alternatives can be specified through multivariate Gaussian distributed latent utilities. We introduce two new algorithms for fitting the MPBART and show that the theoretical mixing rates of our proposals are equal or superior to the existing algorithm in KD. Through simulations, we explore the robustness of the methods to the choice of reference level, imbalance in outcome frequencies, and the specifications of prior hyperparameters for the utility error term. The work is motivated by the application of generating posterior predictive distributions for mortality and engagement in care among HIV-positive patients based on electronic health records (EHRs) from the Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH) in Kenya. In both the application and simulations, we observe better performance using our proposals as compared to KD in terms of MCMC convergence rate and posterior predictive accuracy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Information Borrowing in Regression Models

Model development often takes data structure, subject matter considerations, model assumptions, and goodness of fit into consideration. To diagnose issues with any of these factors, it can be helpful to understand regression model estimates at a more granular level. We propose a new method for decomposing point estimates from a regression model via weights placed on data clusters. The weights are informed only by the model specification and data availability and thus can be used to explicitly link the effects of data imbalance and model assumptions to actual model estimates. The weight matrix has been understood in linear models as the hat matrix in the existing literature. We extend it to Bayesian hierarchical regression models that incorporate prior information and complicated dependence structures through the covariance among random effects. We show that the model weights, which we call borrowing factors, generalize shrinkage and information borrowing to all regression models. In contrast, the focus of the hat matrix has been mainly on the diagonal elements indicating the amount of leverage. We also provide metrics that summarize the borrowing factors and are practically useful. We present the theoretical properties of the borrowing factors and associated metrics and demonstrate their usage in two examples. By explicitly quantifying borrowing and shrinkage, researchers can better incorporate domain knowledge and evaluate model performance and the impacts of data properties such as data imbalance or influential points.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Comparing Biomarkers as Trial Level General Surrogates

An intermediate response measure that accurately predicts efficacy in a new setting can reduce trial cost and time to product licensure. In this paper, we define a trial level general surrogate as a trial level intermediate response that accurately predicts trial level clinical responses. Methods for evaluating trial level general surrogates have been developed previously. Many methods in the literature use trial level intermediate responses for prediction. However, all existing methods focus on surrogate evaluation and prediction in new settings, rather than comparison of candidate trial level surrogates, and few formalize the use of cross validation to quantify the expected prediction error. Our proposed method uses Bayesian non-parametric modeling and cross-validation to estimate the absolute prediction error for use in evaluating and comparing candidate trial level general surrogates. Simulations show that our method performs well across a variety of scenarios. We use our method to evaluate and to compare candidate trial level general surrogates in several multi-national trials of a pentavalent rotavirus vaccine. We identify two immune measures that have potential value as trial level general surrogates and use the measures to predict efficacy in a trial with no clinical outcomes measured.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access