BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Michael E. Wall

Michael E. Wall contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingPerformance

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Accelerating X-Ray Tracing for Exascale Systems using Kokkos

The upcoming exascale computing systems Frontier and Aurora will draw much of their computing power from GPU accelerators. The hardware for these systems will be provided by AMD and Intel, respectively, each supporting their own GPU programming model. The challenge for applications that harness one of these exascale systems will be to avoid lock-in and to preserve performance portability. We report here on our results of using Kokkos to accelerate a real-world application on NERSC's Perlmutter Phase 1 (using NVIDIA A100 accelerators) and the testbed system for OLCF's Frontier (using AMD MI250X). By porting to Kokkos, we were able to successfully run the same X-ray tracing code on both systems and achieved speed-ups between 13% and 66% compared to the original CUDA code. These results are a highly encouraging demonstration of using Kokkos to accelerate production science code.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Performance Optimizations of Recursive Electronic Structure Solvers targeting Multi-Core Architectures (LA-UR-20-26665)

As we rapidly approach the frontiers of ultra large computing resources, software optimization is becoming of paramount interest to scientific application developers interested in efficiently leveraging all available on-Node computing capabilities and thereby improving a requisite science per watt metric. The scientific application of interest here is the Basic Math Library (BML) that provides a singular interface for linear algebra operation frequently used in the Quantum Molecular Dynamics (QMD) community. The provisioning of a singular interface indicates the presence of an abstraction layer which in-turn suggests commonalities in the code-base and therefore any optimization or tuning introduced in the core of code-base has the ability to positively affect the performance of the aforementioned library as a whole. With that in mind, we proceed with this investigation by performing a survey of the entirety of the BML code-base, and extract, in form of micro-kernels, common snippets of code. We introduce several optimization strategies into these micro-kernels including 1.) Strength Reduction 2.) Memory Alignment for large arrays 3.) Non Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) aware allocations to enforce data locality and 4.) appropriate thread affinity and bindings to enhance the overall multi-threaded performance. After introducing these optimizations, we benchmark the micro-kernels and compare the run-time before and after optimization for several target architectures. Finally we use the results as a guide to propagating the optimization strategies into the BML code-base. As a demonstration, herein, we test the efficacy of these optimization strategies by comparing the benchmark and optimized versions of the code.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access