Source author record

Michael Biehl

Michael Biehl appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Machine Learning Information Retrieval astro-ph.GA

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2020arXiv

Complex-valued embeddings of generic proximity data

Proximities are at the heart of almost all machine learning methods. If the input data are given as numerical vectors of equal lengths, euclidean distance, or a Hilbertian inner product is frequently used in modeling algorithms. In a more generic view, objects are compared by a (symmetric) similarity or dissimilarity measure, which may not obey particular mathematical properties. This renders many machine learning methods invalid, leading to convergence problems and the loss of guarantees, like generalization bounds. In many cases, the preferred dissimilarity measure is not metric, like the earth mover distance, or the similarity measure may not be a simple inner product in a Hilbert space but in its generalization a Krein space. If the input data are non-vectorial, like text sequences, proximity-based learning is used or ngram embedding techniques can be applied. Standard embeddings lead to the desired fixed-length vector encoding, but are costly and have substantial limitations in preserving the original data's full information. As an information preserving alternative, we propose a complex-valued vector embedding of proximity data. This allows suitable machine learning algorithms to use these fixed-length, complex-valued vectors for further processing. The complex-valued data can serve as an input to complex-valued machine learning algorithms. In particular, we address supervised learning and use extensions of prototype-based learning. The proposed approach is evaluated on a variety of standard benchmarks and shows strong performance compared to traditional techniques in processing non-metric or non-psd proximity data.

preprint2019arXiv

Feature Relevance Determination for Ordinal Regression in the Context of Feature Redundancies and Privileged Information

Advances in machine learning technologies have led to increasingly powerful models in particular in the context of big data. Yet, many application scenarios demand for robustly interpretable models rather than optimum model accuracy; as an example, this is the case if potential biomarkers or causal factors should be discovered based on a set of given measurements. In this contribution, we focus on feature selection paradigms, which enable us to uncover relevant factors of a given regularity based on a sparse model. We focus on the important specific setting of linear ordinal regression, i.e.\ data have to be ranked into one of a finite number of ordered categories by a linear projection. Unlike previous work, we consider the case that features are potentially redundant, such that no unique minimum set of relevant features exists. We aim for an identification of all strongly and all weakly relevant features as well as their type of relevance (strong or weak); we achieve this goal by determining feature relevance bounds, which correspond to the minimum and maximum feature relevance, respectively, if searched over all equivalent models. In addition, we discuss how this setting enables us to substitute some of the features, e.g.\ due to their semantics, and how to extend the framework of feature relevance intervals to the setting of privileged information, i.e.\ potentially relevant information is available for training purposes only, but cannot be used for the prediction itself.

preprint2019arXiv

Galaxy classification: A machine learning analysis of GAMA catalogue data

We present a machine learning analysis of five labelled galaxy catalogues from the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): The SersicCatVIKING and SersicCatUKIDSS catalogues containing morphological features, the GaussFitSimple catalogue containing spectroscopic features, the MagPhys catalogue including physical parameters for galaxies, and the Lambdar catalogue, which contains photometric measurements. Extending work previously presented at the ESANN 2018 conference - in an analysis based on Generalized Relevance Matrix Learning Vector Quantization and Random Forests - we find that neither the data from the individual catalogues nor a combined dataset based on all 5 catalogues fully supports the visual-inspection-based galaxy classification scheme employed to categorise the galaxies. In particular, only one class, the Little Blue Spheroids, is consistently separable from the other classes. To aid further insight into the nature of the employed visual-based classification scheme with respect to physical and morphological features, we present the galaxy parameters that are discriminative for the achieved class distinctions.

preprint2011arXiv

How to Evaluate Dimensionality Reduction? - Improving the Co-ranking Matrix

The growing number of dimensionality reduction methods available for data visualization has recently inspired the development of quality assessment measures, in order to evaluate the resulting low-dimensional representation independently from a methods' inherent criteria. Several (existing) quality measures can be (re)formulated based on the so-called co-ranking matrix, which subsumes all rank errors (i.e. differences between the ranking of distances from every point to all others, comparing the low-dimensional representation to the original data). The measures are often based on the partioning of the co-ranking matrix into 4 submatrices, divided at the K-th row and column, calculating a weighted combination of the sums of each submatrix. Hence, the evaluation process typically involves plotting a graph over several (or even all possible) settings of the parameter K. Considering simple artificial examples, we argue that this parameter controls two notions at once, that need not necessarily be combined, and that the rectangular shape of submatrices is disadvantageous for an intuitive interpretation of the parameter. We debate that quality measures, as general and flexible evaluation tools, should have parameters with a direct and intuitive interpretation as to which specific error types are tolerated or penalized. Therefore, we propose to replace K with two parameters to control these notions separately, and introduce a differently shaped weighting on the co-ranking matrix. The two new parameters can then directly be interpreted as a threshold up to which rank errors are tolerated, and a threshold up to which the rank-distances are significant for the evaluation. Moreover, we propose a color representation of local quality to visually support the evaluation process for a given mapping, where every point in the mapping is colored according to its local contribution to the overall quality.