Source author record

Meng Li

Meng Li appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

FLUIDSPLAT: Reconstructing Physical Fields from Sparse Sensors via Gaussian Primitives

Reconstructing continuous flow fields from sparse surface-mounted sensors is central to aerodynamic design, flow control, and digital-twin instrumentation. Existing neural methods for this task typically encode sensor readings into implicit latent codes with little spatial interpretability and limited formal guidance on how representational capacity should scale with observation count. Inspired by 3D Gaussian Splatting, we introduce FLUIDSPLAT, a sensor-conditioned model that predicts K anisotropic Gaussian primitives forming a partition-of-unity scaffold, a spatially explicit and interpretable intermediate representation of the flow. For an idealized Gaussian primitive estimator, we prove an $O(K^{-s/d})$ approximation rate for fields with Sobolev smoothness $s$; incorporating $N$ noisy observations yields a squared-risk decomposition with bias $O(K^{-2s/d})$ and variance $O(σ^{2}K/N)$.Balancing the two yields $K^{*}\!\sim\!(N/σ^{2})^{d/(2s+d)}$: primitive count cannot grow freely under sparse sensing, revealing a variance bottleneck that motivates complementing the scaffold with a state-conditioned residual decoder. On a standard cylinder-flow benchmark, FLUIDSPLAT achieves the best mean error across all surface-sensor layouts; on AirfRANS with 8 surface-pressure sensors, it reduces error by 11-23% over the strongest baseline across three standard splits.