Source author record

Meirav Zehavi

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

21works
4topics
4close collaborators

Published work

21 publications

preprint2026arXiv

FPT Approximations for Connected Maximum Coverage

We revisit connectivity-constrained coverage through a unifying model, Partial Connected Red-Blue Dominating Set. Given a red-blue bipartite graph GG and an auxiliary connectivity graph GconnG_{conn} on red vertices, and integers k,tk, t, the task is to find a kk-sized subset of red vertices that dominates at least tt blue vertices, and that induces a connected subgraph in GconnG_{conn}. This formulation captures connected variants of Max Coverage, Partial Dominating Set, and Partial Vertex Cover studied in prior literature. After identifying (parameterized) inapproximability results inherited from known problems, we first show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable by tt. Furthermore, when the bipartite graph excludes Kd,dK_{d,d} as a subgraph, we design (resp. efficient) parameterized approximation schemes for approximating tt (resp. kk). Notably, these FPT approximations do not impose any restrictions on GconnG_{conn}. Together, these results chart the boundary between hardness and FPT-approximability for connectivity-constrained coverage.

preprint2022arXiv

Deleting, Eliminating and Decomposing to Hereditary Classes Are All FPT-Equivalent

For a graph class H{\cal H}, the graph parameters elimination distance to H{\cal H} (denoted by edH{\bf ed}_{\cal H}) [Bulian and Dawar, Algorithmica, 2016], and H{\cal H}-treewidth (denoted by twH{\bf tw}_{\cal H}) [Eiben et al. JCSS, 2021] aim to minimize the treedepth and treewidth, respectively, of the "torso" of the graph induced on a modulator to the graph class H{\cal H}. Here, the torso of a vertex set SS in a graph GG is the graph with vertex set SS and an edge between two vertices u,v∈Su, v \in S if there is a path between uu and vv in GG whose internal vertices all lie outside SS. In this paper, we show that from the perspective of (non-uniform) fixed-parameter tractability (FPT), the three parameters described above give equally powerful parameterizations for every hereditary graph class H{\cal H} that satisfies mild additional conditions. In fact, we show that for every hereditary graph class H{\cal H} satisfying mild additional conditions, with the exception of twH{\bf tw}_{\cal H} parameterized by edH{\bf ed}_{\cal H}, for every pair of these parameters, computing one parameterized by itself or any of the others is FPT-equivalent to the standard vertex-deletion (to H{\cal H}) problem. As an example, we prove that an FPT algorithm for the vertex-deletion problem implies a non-uniform FPT algorithm for computing edH{\bf ed}_{\cal H} and twH{\bf tw}_{\cal H}. The conclusions of non-uniform FPT algorithms being somewhat unsatisfactory, we essentially prove that if H{\cal H} is hereditary, union-closed, CMSO-definable, and (a) the canonical equivalence relation (or any refinement thereof) for membership in the class can be efficiently computed, or (b) the class admits a "strong irrelevant vertex rule", then there exists a uniform FPT algorithm for edH{\bf ed}_{\cal H}.

preprint2021arXiv

Multivariate Analysis of Scheduling Fair Competitions

A \emph{fair competition}, based on the concept of envy-freeness, is a non-eliminating competition where each contestant (team or individual player) may not play against all other contestants, but the total difficulty for each contestant is the same: the sum of the initial rankings of the opponents for each contestant is the same. Similar to other non-eliminating competitions like the Round-robin competition or the Swiss-system competition, the winner of the fair competition is the contestant who wins the most games. The {\sc Fair Non-Eliminating Tournament} ({\sc Fair-NET}) problem can be used to schedule fair competitions whose infrastructure is known. In the {\sc Fair-NET} problem, we are given an infrastructure of a tournament represented by a graph GG and the initial rankings of the contestants represented by a multiset of integers SS. The objective is to decide whether GG is \emph{SS-fair}, i.e., there exists an assignment of the contestants to the vertices of GG such that the sum of the rankings of the neighbors of each contestant in GG is the same constant k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. We initiate a study of the classical and parameterized complexity of {\sc Fair-NET} with respect to several central structural parameters motivated by real world scenarios, thereby presenting a comprehensive picture of it.

preprint2020arXiv

Computation of Hadwiger Number and Related Contraction Problems: Tight Lower Bounds

We prove that the Hadwiger number of an nn-vertex graph GG (the maximum size of a clique minor in GG) cannot be computed in time no(n)n^{o(n)}, unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. This resolves a well-known open question in the area of exact exponential algorithms. The technique developed for resolving the Hadwiger number problem has a wider applicability. We use it to rule out the existence of no(n)n^{o(n)}-time algorithms (up to ETH) for a large class of computational problems concerning edge contractions in graphs.

preprint2020arXiv

Efficient Graph Minors Theory and Parameterized Algorithms for (Planar) Disjoint Paths

In the Disjoint Paths problem, the input consists of an nn-vertex graph GG and a collection of kk vertex pairs, {(si,ti)}i=1k\{(s_i,t_i)\}_{i=1}^k, and the objective is to determine whether there exists a collection {Pi}i=1k\{P_i\}_{i=1}^k of kk pairwise vertex-disjoint paths in GG where the end-vertices of PiP_i are sis_i and tit_i. This problem was shown to admit an f(k)n3f(k)n^3-time algorithm by Robertson and Seymour (Graph Minors XIII, The Disjoint Paths Problem, JCTB). In modern terminology, this means that Disjoint Paths is fixed parameter tractable (FPT) with respect to kk. Remarkably, the above algorithm for Disjoint Paths is a cornerstone of the entire Graph Minors Theory, and conceptually vital to the g(k)n3g(k)n^3-time algorithm for Minor Testing (given two undirected graphs, GG and HH on nn and kk vertices, respectively, determine whether GG contains HH as a minor). In this semi-survey, we will first give an exposition of the Graph Minors Theory with emphasis on efficiency from the viewpoint of Parameterized Complexity. Secondly, we will review the state of the art with respect to the Disjoint Paths and Planar Disjoint Paths problems. Lastly, we will discuss the main ideas behind a new algorithm that combines treewidth reduction and an algebraic approach to solve Planar Disjoint Paths in time 2kO(1)nO(1)2^{k^{O(1)}}n^{O(1)} (for undirected graphs).

preprint2020arXiv

ETH-Tight Algorithms for Long Path and Cycle on Unit Disk Graphs

We present an algorithm for the extensively studied Long Path and Long Cycle problems on unit disk graphs that runs in time 2O(k)(n+m)2^{O(\sqrt{k})}(n+m). Under the Exponential Time Hypothesis, Long Path and Long Cycle on unit disk graphs cannot be solved in time 2o(k)(n+m)O(1)2^{o(\sqrt{k})}(n+m)^{O(1)} [de Berg et al., STOC 2018], hence our algorithm is optimal. Besides the 2O(k)(n+m)O(1)2^{O(\sqrt{k})}(n+m)^{O(1)}-time algorithm for the (arguably) much simpler Vertex Cover problem by de Berg et al. [STOC 2018] (which easily follows from the existence of a 2k2k-vertex kernel for the problem), this is the only known ETH-optimal fixed-parameter tractable algorithm on UDGs. Previously, Long Path and Long Cycle on unit disk graphs were only known to be solvable in time 2O(klog⁡k)(n+m)2^{O(\sqrt{k}\log k)}(n+m). This algorithm involved the introduction of a new type of a tree decomposition, entailing the design of a very tedious dynamic programming procedure. Our algorithm is substantially simpler: we completely avoid the use of this new type of tree decomposition. Instead, we use a marking procedure to reduce the problem to (a weighted version of) itself on a standard tree decomposition of width O(k)O(\sqrt{k}).

preprint2020arXiv

Hitting Topological Minors is FPT

In the Topological Minor Deletion (TM-Deletion) problem input consists of an undirected graph GG, a family of undirected graphs F{\cal F} and an integer kk. The task is to determine whether GG contains a set of vertices SS of size at most kk, such that the graph G∖SG\setminus S obtained from GG by removing the vertices of SS, contains no graph from F{\cal F} as a topological minor. We give an algorithm for TM-Deletionwith running time f(h⋆,k)⋅∣V(G)∣4f(h^\star,k)\cdot |V(G)|^{4}. Here h⋆h^\star is the maximum size of a graph in F{\cal F} and ff is a computable function of h⋆h^\star and kk. This is the first fixed parameter tractable algorithm (FPT) for the problem. In fact, even for the restricted case of planar inputs the first FPT algorithm was found only recently by Golovach et al. [SODA 2020]. For this case we improve upon the algorithm of Golovach et al. [SODA 2020] by designing an FPT algorithm with explicit dependence on kk and h⋆h^\star.

preprint2020arXiv

On the (Parameterized) Complexity of Almost Stable Marriage

In the Stable Marriage problem. when the preference lists are complete, all agents of the smaller side can be matched. However, this need not be true when preference lists are incomplete. In most real-life situations, where agents participate in the matching market voluntarily and submit their preferences, it is natural to assume that each agent wants to be matched to someone in his/her preference list as opposed to being unmatched. In light of the Rural Hospital Theorem, we have to relax the "no blocking pair" condition for stable matchings in order to match more agents. In this paper, we study the question of matching more agents with fewest possible blocking edges. In particular, we find a matching whose size exceeds that of stable matching in the graph by at least t and has at most k blocking edges. We study this question in the realm of parameterized complexity with respect to several natural parameters, k,t,d, where d is the maximum length of a preference list. Unfortunately, the problem remains intractable even for the combined parameter k+t+d. Thus, we extend our study to the local search variant of this problem, in which we search for a matching that not only fulfills each of the above conditions but is "closest", in terms of its symmetric difference to the given stable matching, and obtain an FPT algorithm.

preprint2020arXiv

Parameterized Study of Steiner Tree on Unit Disk Graphs

We study the Steiner Tree problem on unit disk graphs. Given a nn vertex unit disk graph GG, a subset R⊆V(G)R\subseteq V(G) of tt vertices and a positive integer kk, the objective is to decide if there exists a tree TT in GG that spans over all vertices of RR and uses at most kk vertices from V∖RV\setminus R. The vertices of RR are referred to as terminals and the vertices of V(G)∖RV(G)\setminus R as Steiner vertices. First, we show that the problem is NP-Hard. Next, we prove that the Steiner Tree problem on unit disk graphs can be solved in nO(t+k)n^{O(\sqrt{t+k})} time. We also show that the Steiner Tree problem on unit disk graphs parameterized by kk has an FPT algorithm with running time 2O(k)nO(1)2^{O(k)}n^{O(1)}. In fact, the algorithms are designed for a more general class of graphs, called clique-grid graphs. We mention that the algorithmic results can be made to work for the Steiner Tree on disk graphs with bounded aspect ratio. Finally, we prove that the Steiner Tree on disk graphs parameterized by kk is W[1]-hard.

preprint2020arXiv

The Parameterized Complexity of Guarding Almost Convex Polygons

Art Gallery is a fundamental visibility problem in Computational Geometry. The input consists of a simple polygon P, (possibly infinite) sets G and C of points within P, and an integer k; the task is to decide if at most k guards can be placed on points in G so that every point in C is visible to at least one guard. In the classic formulation of Art Gallery, G and C consist of all the points within P. Other well-known variants restrict G and C to consist either of all the points on the boundary of P or of all the vertices of P. Recently, three new important discoveries were made: the above mentioned variants of Art Gallery are all W[1]-hard with respect to k [Bonnet and Miltzow, ESA'16], the classic variant has an O(log k)-approximation algorithm [Bonnet and Miltzow, SoCG'17], and it may require irrational guards [Abrahamsen et al., SoCG'17]. Building upon the third result, the classic variant and the case where G consists only of all the points on the boundary of P were both shown to be \exists R-complete~[Abrahamsen et al., STOC'18]. Even when both G and C consist only of all the points on the boundary of P, the problem is not known to be in NP. Given the first discovery, the following question was posed by Giannopoulos [Lorentz Center Workshop, 2016]: Is Art Gallery FPT with respect to r, the number of reflex vertices? We focus on the variant where G and C are all the vertices of P, called Vertex-Vertex Art Gallery. We show that Vertex-Vertex Art Gallery is solvable in time r^{O(r^2)}n^{O(1)}. Our approach also extends to assert that Vertex-Boundary Art Gallery and Boundary-Vertex Art Gallery are both FPT. We utilize structural properties of "almost convex polygons" to present a two-stage reduction from Vertex-Vertex Art Gallery to a new constraint satisfaction problem (whose solution is also provided in this paper) where constraints have arity 2 and involve monotone functions.

preprint2016arXiv

Simultaneous Feedback Edge Set: A Parameterized Perspective

In this paper we consider Simultaneous Feedback Edge Set (Sim-FES) problem. In this problem, the input is an nn-vertex graph GG, an integer kk and a coloring function col:E(G)→2[α]{\sf col}: E(G) \rightarrow 2^{[α]} and the objective is to check whether there is an edge subset SS of cardinality at most kk in GG such that for all i∈[α]i \in [α], Gi−SG_i - S is acyclic. Here, Gi=(V(G),{e∈E(G)∣i∈col(e)})G_i=(V(G), \{e\in E(G) \mid i \in {\sf col}(e)\}) and [α]={1,…,α}[α]=\{1,\ldots,α\}. When α=1α=1, the problem is polynomial time solvable. We show that for α=3α=3 Sim-FES is NP-hard by giving a reduction from Vertex Cover on cubic graphs. The same reduction shows that the problem does not admit an algorithm of running time O(2o(k)nO(1))O(2^{o(k)}n^{O(1)}) unless ETH fails. This hardness result is complimented by an FPT algorithm for Sim-FES running in time O(2ωkα+αlog⁡knO(1))O(2^{ωkα+α\log k} n^{O(1)}), where ωω is the exponent in the running time of matrix multiplication. The same algorithm gives a polynomial time algorithm for the case when α=2α=2. We also give a kernel for Sim-FES with (kα)O(α)(kα)^{O(α)} vertices. Finally, we consider the problem Maximum Simultaneous Acyclic Subgraph. Here, the input is a graph GG, an integer qq and, a coloring function col:E(G)→2[α]{\sf col}: E(G) \rightarrow 2^{[α]}. The question is whether there is a edge subset FF of cardinality at least qq in GG such that for all i∈[α]i\in [α], G[Fi]G[F_i] is acyclic. Here, Fi={e∈F∣i∈col(e)}F_i=\{e \in F \mid i \in \textsf{col}(e)\}. We give an FPT algorithm for running in time O(2ωqαnO(1))O(2^{ωq α}n^{O(1)}).

preprint2015arXiv

A Multivariate Framework for Weighted FPT Algorithms

We introduce a novel multivariate approach for solving weighted parameterized problems. In our model, given an instance of size nn of a minimization (maximization) problem, and a parameter W≥1W \geq 1, we seek a solution of weight at most (or at least) WW. We use our general framework to obtain efficient algorithms for such fundamental graph problems as Vertex Cover, 3-Hitting Set, Edge Dominating Set and Max Internal Out-Branching. The best known algorithms for these problems admit running times of the form cWnO(1)c^W n^{O(1)}, for some constant c>1c>1. We improve these running times to csnO(1)c^s n^{O(1)}, where s≤Ws\leq W is the minimum size of a solution of weight at most (at least) WW. If no such solution exists, s=min⁡{W,m}s=\min\{W,m\}, where mm is the maximum size of a solution. Clearly, ss can be substantially smaller than WW. In particular, the running times of our algorithms are (almost) the same as the best known O∗O^* running times for the unweighted variants. Thus, we solve the weighted versions of * Vertex Cover in 1.381snO(1)1.381^s n^{O(1)} time and nO(1)n^{O(1)} space. * 3-Hitting Set in 2.168snO(1)2.168^s n^{O(1)} time and nO(1)n^{O(1)} space. * Edge Dominating Set in 2.315snO(1)2.315^s n^{O(1)} time and nO(1)n^{O(1)} space. * Max Internal Out-Branching in 6.855snO(1)6.855^s n^{O(1)} time and space. We further show that Weighted Vertex Cover and Weighted Edge Dominating Set admit fast algorithms whose running times are of the form ctnO(1)c^t n^{O(1)}, where t≤st \leq s is the minimum size of a solution.

preprint2015arXiv

A Randomized Algorithm for Long Directed Cycle

Given a directed graph GG and a parameter kk, the {\sc Long Directed Cycle (LDC)} problem asks whether GG contains a simple cycle on at least kk vertices, while the {\sc kk-Path} problems asks whether GG contains a simple path on exactly kk vertices. Given a deterministic (randomized) algorithm for {\sc kk-Path} as a black box, which runs in time t(G,k)t(G,k), we prove that {\sc LDC} can be solved in deterministic time O∗(max⁡{t(G,2k),4k+o(k)})O^*(\max\{t(G,2k),4^{k+o(k)}\}) (randomized time O∗(max⁡{t(G,2k),4k})O^*(\max\{t(G,2k),4^k\})). In particular, we get that {\sc LDC} can be solved in randomized time O∗(4k)O^*(4^k).

preprint2015arXiv

Maximization Problems Parameterized Using Their Minimization Versions: The Case of Vertex Cover

The parameterized complexity of problems is often studied with respect to the size of their optimal solutions. However, for a maximization problem, the size of the optimal solution can be very large, rendering algorithms parameterized by it inefficient. Therefore, we suggest to study the parameterized complexity of maximization problems with respect to the size of the optimal solutions to their minimization versions. We examine this suggestion by considering the Maximal Minimal Vertex Cover (MMVC) problem, whose minimization version, Vertex Cover, is one of the most studied problems in the field of Parameterized Complexity. Our main contribution is a parameterized approximation algorithm for MMVC, including its weighted variant. We also give conditional lower bounds for the running times of algorithms for MMVC and its weighted variant.

preprint2015arXiv

Mixing Color Coding-Related Techniques

Narrow sieves, representative sets and divide-and-color are three breakthrough color coding-related techniques, which led to the design of extremely fast parameterized algorithms. We present a novel family of strategies for applying mixtures of them. This includes: (a) a mix of representative sets and narrow sieves; (b) a faster computation of representative sets under certain separateness conditions, mixed with divide-and-color and a new technique, "balanced cutting"; (c) two mixtures of representative sets, iterative compression and a new technique, "unbalanced cutting". We demonstrate our strategies by obtaining, among other results, significantly faster algorithms for kk-Internal Out-Branching and Weighted 3-Set kk-Packing, and a framework for speeding-up the previous best deterministic algorithms for kk-Path, kk-Tree, rr-Dimensional kk-Matching, Graph Motif and Partial Cover.

preprint2015arXiv

Parameterized Approximation Algorithms for Packing Problems

In the past decade, many parameterized algorithms were developed for packing problems. Our goal is to obtain tradeoffs that improve the running times of these algorithms at the cost of computing approximate solutions. Consider a packing problem for which there is no known algorithm with approximation ratio αα, and a parameter kk. If the value of an optimal solution is at least kk, we seek a solution of value at least αkαk; otherwise, we seek an arbitrary solution. Clearly, if the best known parameterized algorithm that finds a solution of value tt runs in time O∗(f(t))O^*(f(t)) for some function ff, we are interested in running times better than O∗(f(αk))O^*(f(αk)). We present tradeoffs between running times and approximation ratios for the P2P_2-Packing, 33-Set kk-Packing and 33-Dimensional kk-Matching problems. Our tradeoffs are based on combinations of several known results, as well as a computation of "approximate lopsided universal sets."

preprint2015arXiv

Spotting Trees with Few Leaves

We show two results related to the Hamiltonicity and kk-Path algorithms in undirected graphs by Björklund [FOCS'10], and Björklund et al., [arXiv'10]. First, we demonstrate that the technique used can be generalized to finding some kk-vertex tree with ll leaves in an nn-vertex undirected graph in O∗(1.657k2l/2)O^*(1.657^k2^{l/2}) time. It can be applied as a subroutine to solve the kk-Internal Spanning Tree (kk-IST) problem in O∗(min⁡(3.455k,1.946n))O^*(\min(3.455^k, 1.946^n)) time using polynomial space, improving upon previous algorithms for this problem. In particular, for the first time we break the natural barrier of O∗(2n)O^*(2^n). Second, we show that the iterated random bipartition employed by the algorithm can be improved whenever the host graph admits a vertex coloring with few colors; it can be an ordinary proper vertex coloring, a fractional vertex coloring, or a vector coloring. In effect, we show improved bounds for kk-Path and Hamiltonicity in any graph of maximum degree Δ=4,…,12Δ=4,\ldots,12 or with vector chromatic number at most 8.

preprint2015arXiv

The kk-Leaf Spanning Tree Problem Admits a Klam Value of 39

Given an undirected graph GG and a parameter kk, the kk-Leaf Spanning Tree (kk-LST) problem asks if GG contains a spanning tree with at least kk leaves. This problem has been extensively studied over the past three decades. In 2000, Fellows et al. [FSTTCS'00] explicitly asked whether it admits a klam value of 50. A steady progress towards an affirmative answer continued until 5 years ago, when an algorithm of klam value 37 was discovered. In this paper, we present an O∗(3.188k)O^*(3.188^k)-time parameterized algorithm for kk-LST, which shows that the problem admits a klam value of 39. Our algorithm is based on an interesting application of the well-known bounded search trees technique, where the correctness of rules crucially depends on the history of previously applied rules in a non-standard manner.

preprint2014arXiv

Parameterized Algorithms for Graph Partitioning Problems

We study a broad class of graph partitioning problems, where each problem is specified by a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E), and parameters kk and pp. We seek a subset U⊆VU\subseteq V of size kk, such that α1m1+α2m2α_1m_1 + α_2m_2 is at most (or at least) pp, where α1,α2∈Rα_1,α_2\in\mathbb{R} are constants defining the problem, and m1,m2m_1, m_2 are the cardinalities of the edge sets having both endpoints, and exactly one endpoint, in UU, respectively. This class of fixed cardinality graph partitioning problems (FGPP) encompasses Max (k,n−k)(k,n-k)-Cut, Min kk-Vertex Cover, kk-Densest Subgraph, and kk-Sparsest Subgraph. Our main result is an O∗(4k+o(k)Δk)O^*(4^{k+o(k)}Δ^k) algorithm for any problem in this class, where Δ≥1Δ\geq 1 is the maximum degree in the input graph. This resolves an open question posed by Bonnet et al. [IPEC 2013]. We obtain faster algorithms for certain subclasses of FGPPs, parameterized by pp, or by (k+p)(k+p). In particular, we give an O∗(4p+o(p))O^*(4^{p+o(p)}) time algorithm for Max (k,n−k)(k,n-k)-Cut, thus improving significantly the best known O∗(pp)O^*(p^p) time algorithm.

preprint2014arXiv

Representative Families: A Unified Tradeoff-Based Approach

Let M=(E,I)M=(E,{\cal I}) be a matroid, and let S\cal S be a family of subsets of size pp of EE. A subfamily S^⊆S\widehat{\cal S}\subseteq{\cal S} represents S{\cal S} if for every pair of sets X∈SX\in{\cal S} and Y⊆E∖XY\subseteq E\setminus X such that X∪Y∈IX\cup Y\in{\cal I}, there is a set X^∈S^\widehat{X}\in\widehat{\cal S} disjoint from YY such that X^∪Y∈I\widehat{X}\cup Y\in{\cal I}. Fomin et al. (Proc. ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 2014) introduced a powerful technique for fast computation of representative families for uniform matroids. In this paper, we show that this technique leads to a unified approach for substantially improving the running times of parameterized algorithms for some classic problems. This includes, among others, kk-Partial Cover, kk-Internal Out-Branching, and Long Directed Cycle. Our approach exploits an interesting tradeoff between running time and the size of the representative families.

preprint2013arXiv

Deterministic Parameterized Algorithms for Matching and Packing Problems

We present three deterministic parameterized algorithms for well-studied packing and matching problems, namely, Weighted q-Dimensional p-Matching ((q,p)-WDM) and Weighted q-Set p-Packing ((q,p)-WSP). More specifically, we present an O*(2.85043^{(q-1)p}) time deterministic algorithm for (q,p)-WDM, an O*(8.04143^p) time deterministic algorithm for the unweighted version of (3,p)-WDM, and an O*((0.56201\cdot 2.85043^q)^p) time deterministic algorithm for (q,p)-WSP. Our algorithms significantly improve the previously best known O* running times in solving (q,p)-WDM and (q,p)-WSP, and the previously best known deterministic O* running times in solving the unweighted versions of these problems. Moreover, we present kernels of size O(e^qq(p-1)^q) for (q,p)-WDM and (q,p)-WSP, improving the previously best known kernels of size O(q!q(p-1)^q) for these problems.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.