BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Fahad Panolan

Fahad Panolan appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Data Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete MathematicsComputational Complexitymath.COArtificial IntelligenceComputational Geometry

Catalog footprint

What is connected

16works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

16 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Clausal Deletion Backdoors for QBF: a Parameterized Complexity Approach

Determining the validity of a quantified Boolean formula (QBF) is a PSPACE-complete problem with rich expressive power. Despite interest in efficient solvers, there is, compared to problems in NP, a lack of positive theoretical results, and in the parameterized complexity setting one often has to restrict the quantifier prefix (e.g., bounding alternations) to obtain fixed parameter tractability (FPT). We propose a new parameter: the number of variables in clauses that has to be removed before reaching a tractable class (a clause covering (CC) backdoor). We are then interested in solving QBF in FPT time given a CC-backdoor of size $k$. We consider the three classical, tractable cases of QBF as base classes: Horn, 2-CNF, and linear equations. We establish W[1]-hardness for Horn but prove FPT for the others, and prove that in a precise, algebraic sense, we are only missing one important case for a full dichotomy. Our algorithms are non-trivial and depend on propagation, and Gaussian elimination, respectively, and are comparably unexplored for QBF.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Deleting, Eliminating and Decomposing to Hereditary Classes Are All FPT-Equivalent

For a graph class ${\cal H}$, the graph parameters elimination distance to ${\cal H}$ (denoted by ${\bf ed}_{\cal H}$) [Bulian and Dawar, Algorithmica, 2016], and ${\cal H}$-treewidth (denoted by ${\bf tw}_{\cal H}$) [Eiben et al. JCSS, 2021] aim to minimize the treedepth and treewidth, respectively, of the "torso" of the graph induced on a modulator to the graph class ${\cal H}$. Here, the torso of a vertex set $S$ in a graph $G$ is the graph with vertex set $S$ and an edge between two vertices $u, v \in S$ if there is a path between $u$ and $v$ in $G$ whose internal vertices all lie outside $S$. In this paper, we show that from the perspective of (non-uniform) fixed-parameter tractability (FPT), the three parameters described above give equally powerful parameterizations for every hereditary graph class ${\cal H}$ that satisfies mild additional conditions. In fact, we show that for every hereditary graph class ${\cal H}$ satisfying mild additional conditions, with the exception of ${\bf tw}_{\cal H}$ parameterized by ${\bf ed}_{\cal H}$, for every pair of these parameters, computing one parameterized by itself or any of the others is FPT-equivalent to the standard vertex-deletion (to ${\cal H}$) problem. As an example, we prove that an FPT algorithm for the vertex-deletion problem implies a non-uniform FPT algorithm for computing ${\bf ed}_{\cal H}$ and ${\bf tw}_{\cal H}$. The conclusions of non-uniform FPT algorithms being somewhat unsatisfactory, we essentially prove that if ${\cal H}$ is hereditary, union-closed, CMSO-definable, and (a) the canonical equivalence relation (or any refinement thereof) for membership in the class can be efficiently computed, or (b) the class admits a "strong irrelevant vertex rule", then there exists a uniform FPT algorithm for ${\bf ed}_{\cal H}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Partial Vertex Cover on Graphs of Bounded Degeneracy

In the Partial Vertex Cover (PVC) problem, we are given an $n$-vertex graph $G$ and a positive integer $k$, and the objective is to find a vertex subset $S$ of size $k$ maximizing the number of edges with at least one end-point in $S$. This problem is W[1]-hard on general graphs, but admits a parameterized subexponential time algorithm with running time $2^{O(\sqrt{k})}n^{O(1)}$ on planar and apex-minor free graphs [Fomin et al. (FSTTCS 2009, IPL 2011)], and a $k^{O(k)}n^{O(1)}$ time algorithm on bounded degeneracy graphs [Amini et al. (FSTTCS 2009, JCSS 2011)]. Graphs of bounded degeneracy contain many sparse graph classes like planar graphs, $H$-minor free graphs, and bounded tree-width graphs. In this work, we prove the following results: 1) There is an algorithm for PVC with running time $2^{O(k)}n^{O(1)}$ on graphs of bounded degeneracy which is an improvement on the previous $k^{O(k)}n^{O(1)}$ time algorithm by Amini et al. 2) PVC admits a polynomial compression on graphs of bounded degeneracy, resolving an open problem posed by Amini et al.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Diverse Collections in Matroids and Graphs

We investigate the parameterized complexity of finding diverse sets of solutions to three fundamental combinatorial problems, two from the theory of matroids and the third from graph theory. The input to the Weighted Diverse Bases problem consists of a matroid $M$, a weight function $ω:E(M)\to\mathbb{N}$, and integers $k\geq 1, d\geq 0$. The task is to decide if there is a collection of $k$ bases $B_{1}, \dotsc, B_{k}$ of $M$ such that the weight of the symmetric difference of any pair of these bases is at least $d$. This is a diverse variant of the classical matroid base packing problem. The input to the Weighted Diverse Common Independent Sets problem consists of two matroids $M_{1},M_{2}$ defined on the same ground set $E$, a weight function $ω:E\to\mathbb{N}$, and integers $k\geq 1, d\geq 0$. The task is to decide if there is a collection of $k$ common independent sets $I_{1}, \dotsc, I_{k}$ of $M_{1}$ and $M_{2}$ such that the weight of the symmetric difference of any pair of these sets is at least $d$. This is motivated by the classical weighted matroid intersection problem. The input to the Diverse Perfect Matchings problem consists of a graph $G$ and integers $k\geq 1, d\geq 0$. The task is to decide if $G$ contains $k$ perfect matchings $M_{1},\dotsc,M_{k}$ such that the symmetric difference of any two of these matchings is at least $d$. We show that Weighted Diverse Bases and Weighted Diverse Common Independent Sets are both NP-hard, and derive fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms for all three problems with $(k,d)$ as the parameter.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

ETH-Tight Algorithms for Long Path and Cycle on Unit Disk Graphs

We present an algorithm for the extensively studied Long Path and Long Cycle problems on unit disk graphs that runs in time $2^{O(\sqrt{k})}(n+m)$. Under the Exponential Time Hypothesis, Long Path and Long Cycle on unit disk graphs cannot be solved in time $2^{o(\sqrt{k})}(n+m)^{O(1)}$ [de Berg et al., STOC 2018], hence our algorithm is optimal. Besides the $2^{O(\sqrt{k})}(n+m)^{O(1)}$-time algorithm for the (arguably) much simpler Vertex Cover problem by de Berg et al. [STOC 2018] (which easily follows from the existence of a $2k$-vertex kernel for the problem), this is the only known ETH-optimal fixed-parameter tractable algorithm on UDGs. Previously, Long Path and Long Cycle on unit disk graphs were only known to be solvable in time $2^{O(\sqrt{k}\log k)}(n+m)$. This algorithm involved the introduction of a new type of a tree decomposition, entailing the design of a very tedious dynamic programming procedure. Our algorithm is substantially simpler: we completely avoid the use of this new type of tree decomposition. Instead, we use a marking procedure to reduce the problem to (a weighted version of) itself on a standard tree decomposition of width $O(\sqrt{k})$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Hitting Topological Minors is FPT

In the Topological Minor Deletion (TM-Deletion) problem input consists of an undirected graph $G$, a family of undirected graphs ${\cal F}$ and an integer $k$. The task is to determine whether $G$ contains a set of vertices $S$ of size at most $k$, such that the graph $G\setminus S$ obtained from $G$ by removing the vertices of $S$, contains no graph from ${\cal F}$ as a topological minor. We give an algorithm for TM-Deletionwith running time $f(h^\star,k)\cdot |V(G)|^{4}$. Here $h^\star$ is the maximum size of a graph in ${\cal F}$ and $f$ is a computable function of $h^\star$ and $k$. This is the first fixed parameter tractable algorithm (FPT) for the problem. In fact, even for the restricted case of planar inputs the first FPT algorithm was found only recently by Golovach et al. [SODA 2020]. For this case we improve upon the algorithm of Golovach et al. [SODA 2020] by designing an FPT algorithm with explicit dependence on $k$ and $h^\star$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Manipulating Districts to Win Elections: Fine-Grained Complexity

Gerrymandering is a practice of manipulating district boundaries and locations in order to achieve a political advantage for a particular party. Lewenberg, Lev, and Rosenschein [AAMAS 2017] initiated the algorithmic study of a geographically-based manipulation problem, where voters must vote at the ballot box closest to them. In this variant of gerrymandering, for a given set of possible locations of ballot boxes and known political preferences of $n$ voters, the task is to identify locations for $k$ boxes out of $m$ possible locations to guarantee victory of a certain party in at least $l$ districts. Here integers $k$ and $l$ are some selected parameter. It is known that the problem is NP-complete already for 4 political parties and prior to our work only heuristic algorithms for this problem were developed. We initiate the rigorous study of the gerrymandering problem from the perspectives of parameterized and fine-grained complexity and provide asymptotically matching lower and upper bounds on its computational complexity. We prove that the problem is W[1]-hard parameterized by $k+n$ and that it does not admit an $f(n,k)\cdot m^{o(\sqrt{k})}$ algorithm for any function $f$ of $k$ and $n$ only, unless Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. Our lower bounds hold already for $2$ parties. On the other hand, we give an algorithm that solves the problem for a constant number of parties in time $(m+n)^{O(\sqrt{k})}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Structural Parameterizations with Modulator Oblivion

It is known that problems like Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set and Odd Cycle Transversal are polynomial time solvable in the class of chordal graphs. We consider these problems in a graph that has at most $k$ vertices whose deletion results in a chordal graph, when parameterized by $k$. While this investigation fits naturally into the recent trend of what are called `structural parameterizations', here we assume that the deletion set is not given. One method to solve them is to compute a $k$-sized or an approximate ($f(k)$ sized, for a function $f$) chordal vertex deletion set and then use the structural properties of the graph to design an algorithm. This method leads to at least $k^{\mathcal{O}(k)}n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ running time when we use the known parameterized or approximation algorithms for finding a $k$-sized chordal deletion set on an $n$ vertex graph. In this work, we design $2^{\mathcal{O}(k)}n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ time algorithms for these problems. Our algorithms do not compute a chordal vertex deletion set (or even an approximate solution). Instead, we construct a tree decomposition of the given graph in time $2^{\mathcal{O}(k)}n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ where each bag is a union of four cliques and $\mathcal{O}(k)$ vertices. We then apply standard dynamic programming algorithms over this special tree decomposition. This special tree decomposition can be of independent interest. Our algorithms are adaptive (robust) in the sense that given an integer $k$, they detect whether the graph has a chordal vertex deletion set of size at most $k$ or output the special tree decomposition and solve the problem. We also show lower bounds for the problems we deal with under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Efficient Computation of Representative Sets with Applications in Parameterized and Exact Algorithms

We give two algorithms computing representative families of linear and uniform matroids and demonstrate how to use representative families for designing single-exponential parameterized and exact exponential time algorithms. The applications of our approach include - LONGEST DIRECTED CYCLE - MINIMUM EQUIVALENT GRAPH (MEG) - Algorithms on graphs of bounded treewidth -k-PATH, k-TREE, and more generally, k-SUBGRAPH ISOMORPHISM, where the k-vertex pattern graph is of constant treewidth.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Lossy Kernelization

In this paper we propose a new framework for analyzing the performance of preprocessing algorithms. Our framework builds on the notion of kernelization from parameterized complexity. However, as opposed to the original notion of kernelization, our definitions combine well with approximation algorithms and heuristics. The key new definition is that of a polynomial size $α$-approximate kernel. Loosely speaking, a polynomial size $α$-approximate kernel is a polynomial time pre-processing algorithm that takes as input an instance $(I,k)$ to a parameterized problem, and outputs another instance $(I',k')$ to the same problem, such that $|I'|+k' \leq k^{O(1)}$. Additionally, for every $c \geq 1$, a $c$-approximate solution $s'$ to the pre-processed instance $(I',k')$ can be turned in polynomial time into a $(c \cdot α)$-approximate solution $s$ to the original instance $(I,k)$. Our main technical contribution are $α$-approximate kernels of polynomial size for three problems, namely Connected Vertex Cover, Disjoint Cycle Packing and Disjoint Factors. These problems are known not to admit any polynomial size kernels unless $NP \subseteq coNP/poly$. Our approximate kernels simultaneously beat both the lower bounds on the (normal) kernel size, and the hardness of approximation lower bounds for all three problems. On the negative side we prove that Longest Path parameterized by the length of the path and Set Cover parameterized by the universe size do not admit even an $α$-approximate kernel of polynomial size, for any $α\geq 1$, unless $NP \subseteq coNP/poly$. In order to prove this lower bound we need to combine in a non-trivial way the techniques used for showing kernelization lower bounds with the methods for showing hardness of approximation

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Simultaneous Feedback Edge Set: A Parameterized Perspective

In this paper we consider Simultaneous Feedback Edge Set (Sim-FES) problem. In this problem, the input is an $n$-vertex graph $G$, an integer $k$ and a coloring function ${\sf col}: E(G) \rightarrow 2^{[α]}$ and the objective is to check whether there is an edge subset $S$ of cardinality at most $k$ in $G$ such that for all $i \in [α]$, $G_i - S$ is acyclic. Here, $G_i=(V(G), \{e\in E(G) \mid i \in {\sf col}(e)\})$ and $[α]=\{1,\ldots,α\}$. When $α=1$, the problem is polynomial time solvable. We show that for $α=3$ Sim-FES is NP-hard by giving a reduction from Vertex Cover on cubic graphs. The same reduction shows that the problem does not admit an algorithm of running time $O(2^{o(k)}n^{O(1)})$ unless ETH fails. This hardness result is complimented by an FPT algorithm for Sim-FES running in time $O(2^{ωkα+α\log k} n^{O(1)})$, where $ω$ is the exponent in the running time of matrix multiplication. The same algorithm gives a polynomial time algorithm for the case when $α=2$. We also give a kernel for Sim-FES with $(kα)^{O(α)}$ vertices. Finally, we consider the problem Maximum Simultaneous Acyclic Subgraph. Here, the input is a graph $G$, an integer $q$ and, a coloring function ${\sf col}: E(G) \rightarrow 2^{[α]}$. The question is whether there is a edge subset $F$ of cardinality at least $q$ in $G$ such that for all $i\in [α]$, $G[F_i]$ is acyclic. Here, $F_i=\{e \in F \mid i \in \textsf{col}(e)\}$. We give an FPT algorithm for running in time $O(2^{ωq α}n^{O(1)})$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Parameterized Algorithms for Deletion to (r,l)-graphs

For fixed integers $r,\ell \geq 0$, a graph $G$ is called an {\em $(r,\ell)$-graph} if the vertex set $V(G)$ can be partitioned into $r$ independent sets and $\ell$ cliques. This brings us to the following natural parameterized questions: {\sc Vertex $(r,\ell)$-Partization} and {\sc Edge $(r,\ell)$-Partization}. An input to these problems consist of a graph $G$ and a positive integer $k$ and the objective is to decide whether there exists a set $S\subseteq V(G)$ ($S\subseteq E(G)$) such that the deletion of $S$ from $G$ results in an $(r,\ell)$-graph. These problems generalize well studied problems such as {\sc Odd Cycle Transversal}, {\sc Edge Odd Cycle Transversal}, {\sc Split Vertex Deletion} and {\sc Split Edge Deletion}. We do not hope to get parameterized algorithms for either {\sc Vertex $(r,\ell)$-Partization} or {\sc Edge $(r,\ell)$-Partization} when either of $r$ or $\ell$ is at least $3$ as the recognition problem itself is NP-complete. This leaves the case of $r,\ell \in \{1,2\}$. We almost complete the parameterized complexity dichotomy for these problems. Only the parameterized complexity of {\sc Edge $(2,2)$-Partization} remains open. We also give an approximation algorithm and a Turing kernelization for {\sc Vertex $(r,\ell)$-Partization}. We use an interesting finite forbidden induced graph characterization, for a class of graphs known as $(r,\ell)$-split graphs, properly containing the class of $(r,\ell)$-graphs. This approach to obtain approximation algorithms could be of an independent interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Parameterized Algorithms on Perfect Graphs for deletion to $(r,\ell)$-graphs

For fixed integers $r,\ell \geq 0$, a graph $G$ is called an {\em $(r,\ell)$-graph} if the vertex set $V(G)$ can be partitioned into $r$ independent sets and $\ell$ cliques. The class of $(r, \ell)$ graphs generalizes $r$-colourable graphs (when $\ell =0)$ and hence not surprisingly, determining whether a given graph is an $(r, \ell)$-graph is \NP-hard even when $r \geq 3$ or $\ell \geq 3$ in general graphs. When $r$ and $\ell$ are part of the input, then the recognition problem is NP-hard even if the input graph is a perfect graph (where the {\sc Chromatic Number} problem is solvable in polynomial time). It is also known to be fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) on perfect graphs when parameterized by $r$ and $\ell$. I.e. there is an $f(r+\ell) \cdot n^{\Oh(1)}$ algorithm on perfect graphs on $n$ vertices where $f$ is some (exponential) function of $r$ and $\ell$. In this paper, we consider the parameterized complexity of the following problem, which we call {\sc Vertex Partization}. Given a perfect graph $G$ and positive integers $r,\ell,k$ decide whether there exists a set $S\subseteq V(G)$ of size at most $k$ such that the deletion of $S$ from $G$ results in an $(r,\ell)$-graph. We obtain the following results: \begin{enumerate} \item {\sc Vertex Partization} on perfect graphs is FPT when parameterized by $k+r+\ell$. \item The problem does not admit any polynomial sized kernel when parameterized by $k+r+\ell$. In other words, in polynomial time, the input graph can not be compressed to an equivalent instance of size polynomial in $k+r+\ell$. In fact, our result holds even when $k=0$. \item When $r,\ell$ are universal constants, then {\sc Vertex Partization} on perfect graphs, parameterized by $k$, has a polynomial sized kernel. \end{enumerate}

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Deterministic Truncation of Linear Matroids

Let $M=(E,{\cal I})$ be a matroid. A {\em $k$-truncation} of $M$ is a matroid {$M'=(E,{\cal I}')$} such that for any $A\subseteq E$, $A\in {\cal I}'$ if and only if $|A|\leq k$ and $A\in {\cal I}$. Given a linear representation of $M$ we consider the problem of finding a linear representation of the $k$-truncation of this matroid. This problem can be abstracted out to the following problem on matrices. Let $M$ be a $n\times m$ matrix over a field $\mathbb{F}$. A {\em rank $k$-truncation} of the matrix $M$ is a $k\times m$ matrix $M_k$ (over $\mathbb{F}$ or a related field) such that for every subset $I\subseteq \{1,\ldots,m\}$ of size at most $k$, the set of columns corresponding to $I$ in $M$ has rank $|I|$ if and only of the corresponding set of columns in $M_k$ has rank $|I|$. Finding rank $k$-truncation of matrices is a common way to obtain a linear representation of $k$-truncation of linear matroids, which has many algorithmic applications. A common way to compute a rank $k$-truncation of a $n \times m$ matrix is to multiply the matrix with a random $k\times n$ matrix (with the entries from a field of an appropriate size), yielding a simple randomized algorithm. So a natural question is whether it possible to obtain a rank $k$-truncations of a matrix, {\em deterministically}. In this paper we settle this question for matrices over any finite field or the field of rationals ($\mathbb Q$). We show that given a matrix $M$ over a field $\mathbb{F}$ we can compute a $k$-truncation $M_k$ over the ring $\mathbb{F}[X]$ in deterministic polynomial time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Finding Even Subgraphs Even Faster

Problems of the following kind have been the focus of much recent research in the realm of parameterized complexity: Given an input graph (digraph) on $n$ vertices and a positive integer parameter $k$, find if there exist $k$ edges (arcs) whose deletion results in a graph that satisfies some specified parity constraints. In particular, when the objective is to obtain a connected graph in which all the vertices have even degrees---where the resulting graph is \emph{Eulerian}---the problem is called Undirected Eulerian Edge Deletion. The corresponding problem in digraphs where the resulting graph should be strongly connected and every vertex should have the same in-degree as its out-degree is called Directed Eulerian Edge Deletion. Cygan et al. [\emph{Algorithmica, 2014}] showed that these problems are fixed parameter tractable (FPT), and gave algorithms with the running time $2^{O(k \log k)}n^{O(1)}$. They also asked, as an open problem, whether there exist FPT algorithms which solve these problems in time $2^{O(k)}n^{O(1)}$. In this paper we answer their question in the affirmative: using the technique of computing \emph{representative families of co-graphic matroids} we design algorithms which solve these problems in time $2^{O(k)}n^{O(1)}$. The crucial insight we bring to these problems is to view the solution as an independent set of a co-graphic matroid. We believe that this view-point/approach will be useful in other problems where one of the constraints that need to be satisfied is that of connectivity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Representative Sets of Product Families

A subfamily ${\cal F}'$ of a set family ${\cal F}$ is said to $q$-{\em represent} ${\cal F}$ if for every $A \in {\cal F}$ and $B$ of size $q$ such that $A \cap B = \emptyset$ there exists a set $A' \in {\cal F}'$ such that $A' \cap B = \emptyset$. In this paper, we consider the efficient computation of $q$-representative sets for {\em product} families ${\cal F}$. A family ${\cal F}$ is a product family if there exist families ${\cal A}$ and ${\cal B}$ such that ${\cal F} = \{A \cup B~:~A \in {\cal A}, B \in {\cal B}, A \cap B = \emptyset\}$. Our main technical contribution is an algorithm which given ${\cal A}$, ${\cal B}$ and $q$ computes a $q$-representative family ${\cal F}'$ of ${\cal F}$. The running time of our algorithm is sublinear in $|{\cal F}|$ for many choices of ${\cal A}$, ${\cal B}$ and $q$ which occur naturally in several dynamic programming algorithms. We also give an algorithm for the computation of $q$-representative sets for product families ${\cal F}$ in the more general setting where $q$-representation also involves independence in a matroid in addition to disjointness. This algorithm considerably outperforms the naive approach where one first computes ${\cal F}$ from ${\cal A}$ and ${\cal B}$, and then computes the $q$-representative family ${\cal F}'$ from ${\cal F}$. We give two applications of our new algorithms for computing $q$-representative sets for product families. The first is a $3.8408^{k}n^{O(1)}$ deterministic algorithm for the Multilinear Monomial Detection ($k$-MlD) problem. The second is a significant improvement of deterministic dynamic programming algorithms for "connectivity problems" on graphs of bounded treewidth.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access