BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Mehrdad Oveisi

Mehrdad Oveisi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.med-pheess.IVBiological PhysicsGenomicsMachine LearningTissues and Organs

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

Cardiac SPECT Radiomics Features Repeatability and Reproducibility: A Multi Scanner Phantom Study

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the robustness of cardiac SPECT radiomics features against changes in imaging settings including acquisition and reconstruction settings. Methods: Four scanners were used to acquire SPECT scans of a cardiac phantom with 5mCi of 99mTc. The effects of different image acquisition and reconstruction settings including the Number of View, View Matrix Size, attenuation correction, image reconstruction algorithm, number of iterations, number of subsets, type of filter, full width at half maximum (FWHM) of Gaussian filter, Butterworth filter order, and Butterworth filter cut-off were studied. In total 5263 different images were reconstructed. Eighty-seven radiomic features including first, second, and high order textures were extracted from images. To assess reproducibility and repeatability the coefficient of variation (COV) was used for each image feature over the different imaging settings. Result: IDMN and IDN features from GLCM, RP from GLRLM, ZE from GLSZM, and DE from GLDM feature sets were the only features that were the most reproducible (COV < 5) against changes in all imaging settings. In addition, the IDMN feature from GLCM, LALGLE, SALGLE and LGLZE from GLSZM, and SDLGLE from GLDM feature sets were the features that were less reproducible (COV>20 ) against changes in all imaging settings. Matrix size has the greatest impact on feature variability as most of features are not repeatable and 82.76 of them had (COV>20 ). Conclusion: Repeatability and reproducibility of SPECT radiomics texture features in different imaging settings is feature-dependent, and different image acquisitions and reconstructions have different effects on radiomics texture features. Low COV radiomics features could be consider for further clinical studies. Keywords: SPECT, Radiomics, Cardiac, Repeatability, Reproducibility

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Next Generation Radiogenomics Sequencing for Prediction of EGFR and KRAS Mutation Status in NSCLC Patients Using Multimodal Imaging and Machine Learning Approaches

Aim: In the present work, we aimed to evaluate a comprehensive radiomics framework that enabled prediction of EGFR and KRAS mutation status in NSCLC cancer patients based on PET and CT multi-modalities radiomic features and machine learning (ML) algorithms. Methods: Our study involved 211 NSCLC cancer patient with PET and CTD images. More than twenty thousand radiomic features from different image-feature sets were extracted Feature value was normalized to obtain Z-scores, followed by student t-test students for comparison, high correlated features were eliminated and the False discovery rate (FDR) correction were performed Six feature selection methods and twelve classifiers were used to predict gene status in patient and model evaluation was reported on independent validation sets (68 patients). Results: The best predictive power of conventional PET parameters was achieved by SUVpeak (AUC: 0.69, P-value = 0.0002) and MTV (AUC: 0.55, P-value = 0.0011) for EGFR and KRAS, respectively. Univariate analysis of radiomics features improved prediction power up to AUC: 75 (q-value: 0.003, Short Run Emphasis feature of GLRLM from LOG preprocessed image of PET with sigma value 1.5) and AUC: 0.71 (q-value 0.00005, The Large Dependence Low Gray Level Emphasis from GLDM in LOG preprocessed image of CTD sigma value 5) for EGFR and KRAS, respectively. Furthermore, the machine learning algorithm improved the perdition power up to AUC: 0.82 for EGFR (LOG preprocessed of PET image set with sigma 3 with VT feature selector and SGD classifier) and AUC: 0.83 for KRAS (CT image set with sigma 3.5 with SM feature selector and SGD classifier). Conclusion: We demonstrated that radiomic features extracted from different image-feature sets could be used for EGFR and KRAS mutation status prediction in NSCLC patients, and showed that they have more predictive power than conventional imaging parameters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Non-Invasive Fuhrman Grading of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Computed Tomography Radiomics Features and Machine Learning

Purpose: To identify optimal classification methods for computed tomography (CT) radiomics-based preoperative prediction of clear cells renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) grade. Methods and material: Seventy one ccRCC patients were included in the study. Three image preprocessing techniques (Laplacian of Gaussian, wavelet filter, and discretization of the intensity values) were applied on tumor volumes. In total, 2530 radiomics features (tumor shape and size, intensity statistics, and texture) were extracted from each segmented tumor volume. Univariate analysis was performed to assess the association of each feature with the histological condition. In the case of multivariate analysis, the following was implemented: three feature selection including the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), students t-test and minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) algorithms. These selected features were then used to construct three classification models (SVM, random forest, and logistic regression) to discriminate the high from low-grade ccRCC at nephrectomy. Lastly, multivariate model performance was evaluated on the bootstrapped validation cohort using the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Univariate analysis demonstrated that among different image sets, 128 bin discretized images have statistically significant different (q-value < 0.05) texture parameters with a mean of AUC 0.74 (q-value < 0.05). The three ML-based classifier shows proficient discrimination of the high from low-grade ccRCC. The AUC was 0.78 in logistic regression, 0.62 in random forest, and 0.83 in SVM model, respectively. Conclusion: Radiomics features can be a useful and promising non-invasive method for preoperative evaluation of ccRCC Fuhrman grades. Key words: RCC, Radiomics, Machine Learning, Computed Tomography

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access