BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Meesoon Ha

Meesoon Ha contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.dis-nnmath-phmath.MPnlin.CDquant-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Finite-time quantum Otto engine: Surpassing the quasi-static efficiency due to friction

In finite-time quantum heat engines, some work is consumed to drive a working fluid accompanying coherence, which is called `friction'. To understand the role of friction in quantum thermodynamics, we present a couple of finite-time quantum Otto cycles with two different baths: Agarwal versus Lindbladian. We solve them exactly and compare the performance of the Agarwal engine with that of the Lindbladian engine. In particular, we find remarkable and counterintuitive results that the performance of the Agarwal engine due to friction can be much higher than that in the quasistatic limit with the Otto efficiency, and the power of the Lindbladian engine can be nonzero in the short-time limit. Based on additional numerical calculations of these outcomes, we discuss possible origins of such differences between two engines and reveal them. Our results imply that even with an equilibrium bath, a nonequilibrium working fluid brings on the higher performance than what an equilibrium working fluid does.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Absorbing states of zero-temperature Glauber dynamics in random networks

We study zero-temperature Glauber dynamics for Ising-like spin variable models in quenched random networks with random zero-magnetization initial conditions. In particular, we focus on the absorbing states of finite systems. While it has quite often been observed that Glauber dynamics lets the system be stuck into an absorbing state distinct from its ground state in the thermodynamic limit, very little is known about the likelihood of each absorbing state. In order to explore the variety of absorbing states, we investigate the probability distribution profile of the active link density after saturation as the system size $N$ and $<k >$ vary. As a result, we find that the distribution of absorbing states can be split into two self-averaging peaks whose positions are determined by $<k>$, one slightly above the ground state and the other farther away. Moreover, we suggest that the latter peak accounts for a non-vanishing portion of samples when $N$ goes to infinity while $<k >$ stays fixed. Finally, we discuss the possible implications of our results on opinion dynamics models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Nonlinear stability of phase-locked states for the Kuramoto model with finite inertia

We discuss the {\it nonlinear stability} of phase-locked states for globally coupled nonlinear oscillators with finite inertia, namely the modified Kuramoto model, in the context of the robust $\ell^{\infty}$-norm. We show that some classes of phase-locked states are orbitally $\ell{\infty}$-stable in the sense that its small perturbation asymptotically leads to only the phase shift of the phase-locked state from the original one without changing its fine structures as keeping the same suitable coupling strength among oscillators and the same natural frequencies. The phase shift is uniquely determined by the average of initial phases, the average of initial frequencies, and the strength of inertia. We numerically confirm the stability of the phase-locked state as well as its uniqueness and the phase shift, where various initial conditions are considered. Finally, we argue that some restricted conditions employed in the mathematical proof are not necessary, based on numerical simulation results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access