Source author record

Meena Mahajan

Meena Mahajan appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Computational Complexity

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works

1topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2020arXiv

Algebraic Branching Programs, Border Complexity, and Tangent Spaces

Nisan showed in 1991 that the width of a smallest noncommutative single-(source,sink) algebraic branching program (ABP) to compute a noncommutative polynomial is given by the ranks of specific matrices. This means that the set of noncommutative polynomials with ABP width complexity at most $k$ is Zariski-closed, an important property in geometric complexity theory. It follows that approximations cannot help to reduce the required ABP width. It was mentioned by Forbes that this result would probably break when going from single-(source,sink) ABPs to trace ABPs. We prove that this is correct. Moreover, we study the commutative monotone setting and prove a result similar to Nisan, but concerning the analytic closure. We observe the same behavior here: The set of polynomials with ABP width complexity at most $k$ is closed for single-(source,sink) ABPs and not closed for trace ABPs. The proofs reveal an intriguing connection between tangent spaces and the vector space of flows on the ABP. We close with additional observations on VQP and the closure of VNP which allows us to establish a separation between the two classes.

preprint2016arXiv

Some Complete and Intermediate Polynomials in Algebraic Complexity Theory

We provide a list of new natural $\mathsf{VNP}$-intermediate polynomial families, based on basic (combinatorial) $\mathsf{NP}$-complete problems that are complete under parsimonious reductions. Over finite fields, these families are in $\mathsf{VNP}$, and under the plausible hypothesis $\mathsf{Mod}_p\mathsf{P} \not\subseteq \mathsf{P/poly}$, are neither $\mathsf{VNP}$-hard (even under oracle-circuit reductions) nor in $\mathsf{VP}$. Prior to this, only the Cut Enumerator polynomial was known to be $\mathsf{VNP}$-intermediate, as shown by Bürgisser in 2000. We next show that over rationals and reals, two of our intermediate polynomials, based on satisfiability and Hamiltonian cycle, are not monotone affine polynomial-size projections of the permanent. This augments recent results along this line due to Grochow. Finally, we describe a (somewhat natural) polynomial defined independent of a computation model, and show that it is $\mathsf{VP}$-complete under polynomial-size projections. This complements a recent result of Durand et al. (2014) which established $\mathsf{VP}$-completeness of a related polynomial but under constant-depth oracle circuit reductions. Both polynomials are based on graph homomorphisms. A simple restriction yields a family similarly complete for $\mathsf{VBP}$.

preprint2016arXiv

Sums of read-once formulas: How many summands suffice?

An arithmetic read-once formula (ROF) is a formula (circuit of fan-out 1) over $+,\times$ where each variable labels at most one leaf. Every multilinear polynomial can be expressed as the sum of ROFs. In this work, we prove, for certain multilinear polynomials, a tight lower bound on the number of summands in such an expression.

preprint2015arXiv

Read-once polynomials: How many summands suffice?

An arithmetic read-once formula (ROF) is a formula (circuit of fan-out 1) over $+, \times$ where each variable labels at most one leaf. Every multilinear polynomial can be expressed as the sum of ROFs. In this work, we prove, for certain multilinear polynomials, a tight lower bound on the number of summands in such an expression.

preprint2013arXiv

Small Depth Proof Systems

A proof system for a language L is a function f such that Range(f) is exactly L. In this paper, we look at proofsystems from a circuit complexity point of view and study proof systems that are computationally very restricted. The restriction we study is: they can be computed by bounded fanin circuits of constant depth (NC^0), or of O(log log n) depth but with O(1) alternations (polylog AC^0). Each output bit depends on very few input bits; thus such proof systems correspond to a kind of local error-correction on a theorem-proof pair. We identify exactly how much power we need for proof systems to capture all regular languages. We show that all regular language have polylog AC^0 proof systems, and from a previous result (Beyersdorff et al, MFCS 2011, where NC^0 proof systems were first introduced), this is tight. Our technique also shows that MAJ has polylog AC^0 proof system. We explore the question of whether TAUT has NC^0 proof systems. Addressing this question about 2TAUT, and since 2TAUT is closely related to reachability in graphs, we ask the same question about Reachability. We show that both Undirected Reachability and Directed UnReachability have NC^0 proof systems, but Directed Reachability is still open. In the context of how much power is needed for proof systems for languages in NP, we observe that proof systems for a good fraction of languages in NP do not need the full power of AC^0; they have SAC^0 or coSAC^0 proof systems.