BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research pathsDiscover
Research tools
Network
Opportunities
Account
Source author record
Andreas Krebs appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.
Catalog footprint
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
We give a simple new proof that regular languages defined by first-order sentences with no quantifier alteration can be defined by such sentences in which only regular atomic formulas appear. Earlier proofs of this fact relied on arguments from circuit complexity or algebra. Our proof is much more elementary, and uses only the most basic facts about finite automata.
We study an extension of FO^2[<], first-order logic interpreted in finite words, in which formulas are restricted to use only two variables. We adjoin to this language two-variable atomic formulas that say, `the letter a appears between positions x and y'. This is, in a sense, the simplest property that is not expressible using only two variables. We present several logics, both first-order and temporal, that have the same expressive power, and find matching lower and upper bounds for the complexity of satisfiability for each of these formulations. We also give an effective necessary condition, in terms of the syntactic monoid of a regular language, for a property to be expressible in this logic. We show that this condition is also sufficient for words over a two-letter alphabet. This algebraic analysis allows us us to prove, among other things, that our new logic has strictly less expressive power than full first-order logic FO[<].
We introduce two variants of computation tree logic CTL based on team semantics: an asynchronous one and a synchronous one. For both variants we investigate the computational complexity of the satisfiability as well as the model checking problem. The satisfiability problem is shown to be EXPTIME-complete. Here it does not matter which of the two semantics are considered. For model checking we prove a PSPACE-completeness for the synchronous case, and show P-completeness for the asynchronous case. Furthermore we prove several interesting fundamental properties of both semantics.
The aim of this study is to understand the inherent expressive power of CTL operators. We investigate the complexity of model checking for all CTL fragments with one CTL operator and arbitrary Boolean operators. This gives us a fingerprint of each CTL operator. The comparison between the fingerprints yields a hierarchy of the operators that mirrors their strength with respect to model checking.
Given a connected graph $G$ and its vertex $x$, let $U_x(G)$ denote the universal cover of $G$ obtained by unfolding $G$ into a tree starting from $x$. Let $T=T(n)$ be the minimum number such that, for graphs $G$ and $H$ with at most $n$ vertices each, the isomorphism of $U_x(G)$ and $U_y(H)$ surely follows from the isomorphism of these rooted trees truncated at depth $T$. Motivated by applications in theory of distributed computing, Norris [Discrete Appl. Math. 1995] asks if $T(n)\le n$. We answer this question in the negative by establishing that $T(n)=(2-o(1))n$. Our solution uses basic tools of finite model theory such as a bisimulation version of the Immerman-Lander 2-pebble counting game. The graphs $G_n$ and $H_n$ we construct to prove the lower bound for $T(n)$ also show some other tight lower bounds. Both having $n$ vertices, $G_n$ and $H_n$ can be distinguished in 2-variable counting logic only with quantifier depth $(1-o(1))n$. It follows that color refinement, the classical procedure used in isomorphism testing and other areas for computing the coarsest equitable partition of a graph, needs $(1-o(1))n$ rounds to achieve color stabilization on each of $G_n$ and $H_n$. Somewhat surprisingly, this number of rounds is not enough for color stabilization on the disjoint union of $G_n$ and $H_n$, where $(2-o(1))n$ rounds are needed.
We investigate in a method for proving separation results for abstract classes of languages. A well established method to characterize varieties of regular languages are identities. We use a recently established generalization of these identities to non-regular languages by Gehrke, Grigorieff, and Pin: so called equations, which are capable of describing arbitrary Boolean algebras of languages. While the main concern of their result is the existence of these equations, we investigate in a general method that could allow to find equations for language classes in an inductive manner. Thereto we extend an important tool -- the block product or substitution principle -- known from logic and algebra, to non-regular language classes. Furthermore, we abstract this concept by defining it directly as an operation on (non-regular) language classes. We show that this principle can be used to obtain equations for certain circuit classes, given equations for the gate types. Concretely, we demonstrate the applicability of this method by obtaining a description via equations for all languages recognized by circuit families that contain a constant number of (inner) gates, given a description of the gate types via equations.
We propose to study value automata with filters, a natural generalization of regular cost automata to nondeterminism. Models such as weighted automata and Parikh automata appear naturally as specializations. Results on the expressiveness of this model offer a general understanding of the behavior of the models that arise as special cases. A landscape of such restrictions is drawn.
We examine languages of unranked forests definable using the temporal operators EF and EX. We characterize the languages definable in this logic, and various fragments thereof, using the syntactic forest algebras introduced by Bojanczyk and Walukiewicz. Our algebraic characterizations yield efficient algorithms for deciding when a given language of forests is definable in this logic. The proofs are based on understanding the wreath product closures of a few small algebras, for which we introduce a general ideal theory for forest algebras. This combines ideas from the work of Bojanczyk and Walukiewicz for the analogous logics on binary trees and from early work of Stiffler on wreath product of finite semigroups.
Given two structures $G$ and $H$ distinguishable in $\fo k$ (first-order logic with $k$ variables), let $A^k(G,H)$ denote the minimum alternation depth of a $\fo k$ formula distinguishing $G$ from $H$. Let $A^k(n)$ be the maximum value of $A^k(G,H)$ over $n$-element structures. We prove the strictness of the quantifier alternation hierarchy of $\fo 2$ in a strong quantitative form, namely $A^2(n)\ge n/8-2$, which is tight up to a constant factor. For each $k\ge2$, it holds that $A^k(n)>\log_{k+1}n-2$ even over colored trees, which is also tight up to a constant factor if $k\ge3$. For $k\ge 3$ the last lower bound holds also over uncolored trees, while the alternation hierarchy of $\fo 2$ collapses even over all uncolored graphs. We also show examples of colored graphs $G$ and $H$ on $n$ vertices that can be distinguished in $\fo 2$ much more succinctly if the alternation number is increased just by one: while in $Σ_{i}$ it is possible to distinguish $G$ from $H$ with bounded quantifier depth, in $Π_{i}$ this requires quantifier depth $Ω(n^2)$. The quadratic lower bound is best possible here because, if $G$ and $H$ can be distinguished in $\fo k$ with $i$ quantifier alternations, this can be done with quantifier depth $n^{2k-2}$.
A proof system for a language L is a function f such that Range(f) is exactly L. In this paper, we look at proofsystems from a circuit complexity point of view and study proof systems that are computationally very restricted. The restriction we study is: they can be computed by bounded fanin circuits of constant depth (NC^0), or of O(log log n) depth but with O(1) alternations (polylog AC^0). Each output bit depends on very few input bits; thus such proof systems correspond to a kind of local error-correction on a theorem-proof pair. We identify exactly how much power we need for proof systems to capture all regular languages. We show that all regular language have polylog AC^0 proof systems, and from a previous result (Beyersdorff et al, MFCS 2011, where NC^0 proof systems were first introduced), this is tight. Our technique also shows that MAJ has polylog AC^0 proof system. We explore the question of whether TAUT has NC^0 proof systems. Addressing this question about 2TAUT, and since 2TAUT is closely related to reachability in graphs, we ask the same question about Reachability. We show that both Undirected Reachability and Directed UnReachability have NC^0 proof systems, but Directed Reachability is still open. In the context of how much power is needed for proof systems for languages in NP, we observe that proof systems for a good fraction of languages in NP do not need the full power of AC^0; they have SAC^0 or coSAC^0 proof systems.
We characterize the languages in the individual levels of the quantifier alternation hierarchy of first-order logic with two variables by identities. This implies decidability of the individual levels. More generally we show that the two-sided semidirect product of a decidable variety with the variety J is decidable.
We describe a new way to construct finite geometric objects. For every k we obtain a symmetric configuration E(k-1) with k points on a line. In particular, we have a constructive existence proof for such configurations. The method is very simple and purely geometric. It also produces interesting periodic matrices.
We consider first-order logic with monoidal quantifiers over words. We show that all languages with a neutral letter, definable using the addition numerical predicate are also definable with the order predicate as the only numerical predicate. Let S be a subset of monoids. Let LS be the logic closed under quantification over the monoids in S and N be the class of neutral letter languages. Then we show that: LS[<,+] cap N = LS[<] Our result can be interpreted as the Crane Beach conjecture to hold for the logic LS[<,+]. As a corollary of our result we get the result of Roy and Straubing that FO+MOD[<,+] collapses to FO+MOD[<]. For cyclic groups, we answer an open question of Roy and Straubing, proving that MOD[<,+] collapses to MOD[<]. Our result also shows that multiplication is necessary for Barrington's theorem to hold. All these results can be viewed as separation results for very uniform circuit classes. For example we separate FO[<,+]-uniform CC0 from FO[<,+]-uniform ACC0.
We study the streaming complexity of the membership problem of 1-turn-Dyck2 and Dyck2 when there are a few errors in the input string. 1-turn-Dyck2 with errors: We prove that there exists a randomized one-pass algorithm that given x checks whether there exists a string x' in 1-turn-Dyck2 such that x is obtained by flipping at most $k$ locations of x' using: - O(k log n) space, O(k log n) randomness, and poly(k log n) time per item and with error at most 1/poly(n). - O(k^{1+epsilon} + log n) space for every 0 <= epsilon <= 1, O(log n) randomness, O(polylog(n) + poly(k)) time per item, with error at most 1/8. Here, we also prove that any randomized one-pass algorithm that makes error at most k/n requires at least Omega(k log(n/k)) space to accept strings which are exactly k-away from strings in 1-turn-Dyck2 and to reject strings which are exactly (k+2)-away from strings in 1-turn-Dyck2. Since 1-turn-Dyck2 and the Hamming Distance problem are closely related we also obtain new upper and lower bounds for this problem. Dyck2 with errors: We prove that there exists a randomized one-pass algorithm that given x checks whether there exists a string x' in Dyck2 such that x is obtained from x' by changing (in some restricted manner) at most k positions using: - O(k log n + sqrt(n log n)) space, O(k log n) randomness, poly(k log n) time per element and with error at most 1/poly(n). - O(k^(1+epsilon)+ sqrt(n log n)) space for every 0 <= epsilon <= 1, O(log n) randomness, O(polylog(n) + poly(k)) time per element, with error at most 1/8.