BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Mayukh Bagchi

Mayukh Bagchi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceDatabasesComputer Visioncs.CYDigital Libraries

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

From Knowledge Representation to Knowledge Organization and Back

Knowledge Representation (KR) and facet-analytical Knowledge Organization (KO) have been the two most prominent methodologies of data and knowledge modelling in the Artificial Intelligence community and the Information Science community, respectively. KR boasts of a robust and scalable ecosystem of technologies to support knowledge modelling while, often, underemphasizing the quality of its models (and model-based data). KO, on the other hand, is less technology-driven but has developed a robust framework of guiding principles (canons) for ensuring modelling (and model-based data) quality. This paper elucidates both the KR and facet-analytical KO methodologies in detail and provides a functional mapping between them. Out of the mapping, the paper proposes an integrated KO-enriched KR methodology with all the standard components of a KR methodology plus the guiding canons of modelling quality provided by KO. The practical benefits of the methodological integration has been exemplified through a prominent case study of KR-based image annotation exercise.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A Diversity-Aware Domain Development Methodology

The development of domain ontological models, though being a mature research arena backed by well-established methodologies, still suffer from two key shortcomings. Firstly, the issues concerning the semantic persistency of ontology concepts and their flexible reuse in domain development employing existing approaches. Secondly, due to the difficulty in understanding and reusing top-level concepts in existing foundational ontologies, the obfuscation regarding the semantic nature of domain representations. The paper grounds the aforementioned shortcomings in representation diversity and proposes a three-fold solution - (i) a pipeline for rendering concepts reuse-ready, (ii) a first characterization of a minimalistic foundational knowledge model, named foundational teleology, semantically explicating foundational distinctions enforcing the static as well as dynamic nature of domain representations, and (iii) a flexible, reuse-native methodology for diversity-aware domain development exploiting solutions (i) and (ii). The preliminary work reported validates the potentiality of the solution components.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

LiveSchema: A Gateway Towards Learning on Knowledge Graph Schemas

One of the major barriers to the training of algorithms on knowledge graph schemas, such as vocabularies or ontologies, is the difficulty that scientists have in finding the best input resource to address the target prediction tasks. In addition to this, a key challenge is to determine how to manipulate (and embed) these data, which are often in the form of particular triples (i.e., subject, predicate, object), to enable the learning process. In this paper, we describe the LiveSchema initiative, namely a gateway that offers a family of services to easily access, analyze, transform and exploit knowledge graph schemas, with the main goal of facilitating the reuse of these resources in machine learning use cases. As an early implementation of the initiative, we also advance an online catalog, which relies on more than 800 resources, with the first set of example services.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Representation Heterogeneity

Semantic Heterogeneity is conventionally understood as the existence of variance in the representation of a target reality when modelled, by independent parties, in different databases, schemas and/ or data. We argue that the mere encoding of variance, while being necessary, is not sufficient enough to deal with the problem of representational heterogeneity, given that it is also necessary to encode the unifying basis on which such variance is manifested. To that end, this paper introduces a notion of Representation Heterogeneity in terms of the co-occurrent notions of Representation Unity and Representation Diversity. We have representation unity when two heterogeneous representations model the same target reality, representation diversity otherwise. In turn, this paper also highlights how these two notions get instantiated across the two layers of any representation, i.e., Language and Knowledge.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Smart Cities, Smart Libraries and Smart Knowledge Managers: Ushering in the neo-Knowledge Society

The emergence of smart cities as a specific concept is not very old. In simple terms, it refers to cities which are sustainable and driven predominantly by their Information and Communication Technology (ICT) infrastructure. Smart libraries and smart knowledge managers, alongside its other smart component-entities, are vital for their emergence, sustenance and progress. The paper attempts at deducing a symbiosis amongst smart cities, smart libraries and smart knowledge managers. It further elaborates on how these will usher in the neo-knowledge society, and the opportunities it'll offer vis-à-vis Library and Information Science (LIS). Finally, it concludes on an optimistic note, mentioning possible future research activities in this regard.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Visual Ground Truth Construction as Faceted Classification

Recent work in Machine Learning and Computer Vision has provided evidence of systematic design flaws in the development of major object recognition benchmark datasets. One such example is ImageNet, wherein, for several categories of images, there are incongruences between the objects they represent and the labels used to annotate them. The consequences of this problem are major, in particular considering the large number of machine learning applications, not least those based on Deep Neural Networks, that have been trained on these datasets. In this paper we posit the problem to be the lack of a knowledge representation (KR) methodology providing the foundations for the construction of these ground truth benchmark datasets. Accordingly, we propose a solution articulated in three main steps: (i) deconstructing the object recognition process in four ordered stages grounded in the philosophical theory of teleosemantics; (ii) based on such stratification, proposing a novel four-phased methodology for organizing objects in classification hierarchies according to their visual properties; and (iii) performing such classification according to the faceted classification paradigm. The key novelty of our approach lies in the fact that we construct the classification hierarchies from visual properties exploiting visual genus-differentiae, and not from linguistically grounded properties. The proposed approach is validated by a set of experiments on the ImageNet hierarchy of musical experiments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access