Researcher profile

Max van Mulken

Max van Mulken contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

Competitive Searching over Terrains

We study a variant of the searching problem where the environment consists of a known terrain and the goal is to obtain visibility of an unknown target point on the surface of the terrain. The searcher starts on the surface of the terrain and is allowed to fly above the terrain. The goal is to devise a searching strategy that minimizes the competitive ratio, that is, the worst-case ratio between the distance traveled by the searching strategy and the minimum travel distance needed to detect the target. For $1.5$D terrains we show that any searching strategy has a competitive ratio of at least $\sqrt{82}$ and we present a nearly-optimal searching strategy that achieves a competitive ratio of $3\sqrt{19/2} \approx \sqrt{82} + 0.19$. This strategy extends directly to the case where the searcher has no knowledge of the terrain beforehand. For $2.5$D terrains we show that the optimal competitive ratio depends on the maximum slope $λ$ of the terrain, and is hence unbounded in general. Specifically, we provide a lower bound on the competitive ratio of $Ω(\sqrtλ)$. Finally, we complement the lower bound with a searching strategy based on the maximum slope of the known terrain, which achieves a competitive ratio of $O(\sqrtλ)$.

preprint2020arXiv

Dots & Polygons

We present a new game, Dots & Polygons, played on a planar point set. Players take turns connecting two points, and when a player closes a (simple) polygon, the player scores its area. We show that deciding whether the game can be won from a given state, is NP-hard. We do so by a reduction from vertex-disjoint cycle packing in cubic planar graphs, including a self-contained reduction from planar 3-Satisfiability to this cycle-packing problem. This also provides a simple proof of the NP-hardness of the related game Dots & Boxes. For points in convex position, we discuss a greedy strategy for Dots & Polygons.