Researcher profile

Max Halford

Max Halford contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Explaining Machine Learning Models using Entropic Variable Projection

In this paper, we present a new explainability formalism designed to shed light on how each input variable of a test set impacts the predictions of machine learning models. Hence, we propose a group explainability formalism for trained machine learning decision rules, based on their response to the variability of the input variables distribution. In order to emphasize the impact of each input variable, this formalism uses an information theory framework that quantifies the influence of all input-output observations based on entropic projections. This is thus the first unified and model agnostic formalism enabling data scientists to interpret the dependence between the input variables, their impact on the prediction errors, and their influence on the output predictions. Convergence rates of the entropic projections are provided in the large sample case. Most importantly, we prove that computing an explanation in our framework has a low algorithmic complexity, making it scalable to real-life large datasets. We illustrate our strategy by explaining complex decision rules learned by using XGBoost, Random Forest or Deep Neural Network classifiers on various datasets such as Adult Income, MNIST, CelebA, Boston Housing, Iris, as well as synthetic ones. We finally make clear its differences with the explainability strategies LIME and SHAP, that are based on single observations. Results can be reproduced by using the freely distributed Python toolbox https://gems-ai.aniti.fr/.

preprint2020arXiv

Selectivity correction with online machine learning

Computer systems are full of heuristic rules which drive the decisions they make. These rules of thumb are designed to work well on average, but ignore specific information about the available context, and are thus sub-optimal. The emerging field of machine learning for systems attempts to learn decision rules with machine learning algorithms. In the database community, many recent proposals have been made to improve selectivity estimation with batch machine learning methods. Such methods are all batch methods which require retraining and cannot handle concept drift, such as workload changes and schema modifications. We present online machine learning as an alternative approach. Online models learn on the fly and do not require storing data, they are more lightweight than batch models, and finally may adapt to concept drift. As an experiment, we teach models to improve the selectivity estimates made by PostgreSQL's cost model. Our experiments make the case that simple online models are able to compete with a recently proposed deep learning method.

preprint2020arXiv

Selectivity Estimation with Attribute Value Dependencies using Linked Bayesian Networks

Relational query optimisers rely on cost models to choose between different query execution plans. Selectivity estimates are known to be a crucial input to the cost model. In practice, standard selectivity estimation procedures are prone to large errors. This is mostly because they rely on the so-called attribute value independence and join uniformity assumptions. Therefore, multidimensional methods have been proposed to capture dependencies between two or more attributes both within and across relations. However, these methods require a large computational cost which makes them unusable in practice. We propose a method based on Bayesian networks that is able to capture cross-relation attribute value dependencies with little overhead. Our proposal is based on the assumption that dependencies between attributes are preserved when joins are involved. Furthermore, we introduce a parameter for trading between estimation accuracy and computational cost. We validate our work by comparing it with other relevant methods on a large workload derived from the JOB and TPC-DS benchmarks. Our results show that our method is an order of magnitude more efficient than existing methods, whilst maintaining a high level of accuracy.