BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Mauricio Mondragon

Mauricio Mondragon contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
gr-qcphysics.hist-phhep-thmath-phmath.MPphysics.gen-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
6topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

Comment on "Dimension of the Moduli Space and Hamiltonian Analysis of BF Field Theories"

The purpose of this Comment is to point out that the results presented in the appendix of M. Mondragon and M. Montesinos, J. Math. Phys. 47, 022301 (2006) provides a generic method so as to deal with cases as those of Section 6 of R. Cartas-Fuentevilla, A. Escalante-Hernández, and J. Berra-Montiel, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26, 3013 (2011). The results already reported are: the canonical analysis, the transformations generated by the constraints, and the analysis of the reducibility of the constraints for SO(3,1) and SO(4) four-dimensional BF theory coupled or not to a cosmological constant. But such results are generic and hold actually for any Lie algebra having a non-degenerate inner product invariant under the action of the gauge group.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Space and Time as Containers of the "Physical Material World" with some Conceptual and Epistemological Consequences in Modern Physics

A particular science is not only defined by its object of study, but also by the point of view and method under which it considers that same object. Taking space and time as an illustrative example, our main aim here is to bring out an almost forgotten conception of science found in many doctrines that seek mainly-but not only-a qualitative and synthetic knowledge rather than, as in modern physics, for example, a quantitative and analytic knowledge. The latter point of view is found to be very limited and fragmented, leaving outside many scientific questions and answers, while the former opens up the way to valuable and interesting answers to those and many other questions. In particular, we argue that the conception of space and time as containers of, respectively, bodies and events, clarify many conceptual and epistemological issues of modern science related to the physical material world.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Space and time as containers, Space divisibility, and Unrepeatability of events

Our main purpose here is to study some qualitative aspects of space and time. These include the notion of space and time regarded as the containers of respectively bodies and events, the divisibility of space, and the unrepeatability of events. We thereof argue that the ideas of an empty space, portions of empty space and a homogenous space are misleading when they are applied to realized space, and that they are therefore not suitable for space as a condition of corporeal world (as it is often assumed). We also show that smallest (indivisible) and "final" ("ultimate") parts of space and bodies have, at most, a conventional character, and not a "fundamental" one (as it is usually claimed). With respect to time and events, analogous conclusions follow. However, we claim that between space and time there exist rather big qualitative differences, which make time's nature much more difficult to grasp than that of space. In this sense, we discuss the impossibility of repetition of events and some of its applications in modern science, notably, probabilistic and statistical science. Some other implications of this study in conceptual ("philosophical") aspects of modern physics are briefly discussed, such as the "timeless" interpretation of general relativity, the notion of space-time, among others. Finally, some considerations about the usual conception and the scope of modern science in general, and modern physics in particular, are addressed throughout the article.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access