BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Matthias Bentert

Matthias Bentert contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete MathematicsComputer Science and Game Theorymath.COMultiagent SystemsSocial and Information Networks

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
11works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

11 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Complexity of Perfect and Ideal Resilience Verification in Fast Re-Route Networks

To achieve fast recovery from link failures, most modern communication networks feature fully decentralized fast re-routing mechanisms. These re-routing mechanisms rely on pre-installed static re-routing rules at the nodes (the routers), which depend only on local failure information, namely on the failed links incident to the node. Ideally, a network is perfectly resilient: the re-routing rules ensure that packets are always successfully routed to their destinations as long as the source and the destination are still physically connected in the underlying network after the failures. Unfortunately, there are examples where achieving perfect resilience is not possible. Surprisingly, only very little is known about the algorithmic aspect of when and how perfect resilience can be achieved. We investigate the computational complexity of analyzing such local fast re-routing mechanisms. Our main result is a negative one: we show that even checking whether a given set of static re-routing rules ensures perfect resilience is coNP-complete. We also show coNP-completeness of the so-called ideal resilience, a weaker notion of resilience often considered in the literature. Additionally, we investigate other fundamental variations of the problem. In particular, we show that our coNP-completeness proof also applies to scenarios where the re-routing rules have specific patterns (known as skipping in the literature). On the positive side, for scenarios where nodes do not have information about the link from which a packet arrived (the so-called in-port), we present linear-time algorithms for both the verification and synthesis problem for perfect resilience.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

Density Matters: A Complexity Dichotomy of Deleting Edges to Bound Subgraph Density

We study $τ$-Bounded-Density Edge Deletion ($τ$-BDED), where given an undirected graph $G$, the task is to remove as few edges as possible to obtain a graph $G&#39;$ where no subgraph of $G&#39;$ has density more than $τ$. The density of a (sub)graph is the number of edges divided by the number of vertices. This problem was recently introduced and shown to be NP-hard for $τ\in \{2/3, 3/4, 1 + 1/25\}$, but polynomial-time solvable for $τ\in \{0,1/2,1\}$ [Bazgan et al., JCSS 2025]. We provide a complete dichotomy with respect to the target density $τ$: 1. If $2τ\in \mathbb{N}$ (half-integral target density) or $τ< 2/3$, then $τ$-BDED is polynomial-time solvable. 2. Otherwise, $τ$-BDED is NP-hard. We complement the NP-hardness with fixed-parameter tractability with respect to the treewidth of $G$. Moreover, for integral target density $τ\in \mathbb{N}$, we show $τ$-BDED to be solvable in randomized $O(m^{1 + o(1)})$ time. Our algorithmic results are based on a reduction to a new general flow problem on restricted networks that, depending on $τ$, can be solved via Maximum s-t-Flow or General Factors. We believe this connection between these variants of flow and matching to be of independent interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Stable Matching with Multilayer Approval Preferences: Approvals can be Harder than Strict Preferences

We study stable matching problems where agents have multilayer preferences: There are $\ell$ layers each consisting of one preference relation for each agent. Recently, Chen et al. [EC &#39;18] studied such problems with strict preferences, establishing four multilayer adaptions of classical notions of stability. We follow up on their work by analyzing the computational complexity of stable matching problems with multilayer approval preferences. We consider eleven stability notions derived from three well-established stability notions for stable matchings with ties and the four adaptions proposed by Chen et al. For each stability notion, we show that the problem of finding a stable matching is either polynomial-time solvable or NP-hard. Furthermore, we examine the influence of the number of layers and the desired &#34;degree of stability&#34; on the problems&#39; complexity. Somewhat surprisingly, we discover that assuming approval preferences instead of strict preferences does not considerably simplify the situation (and sometimes even makes polynomial-time solvable problems NP-hard).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Using a geometric lens to find k disjoint shortest paths

Given an undirected $n$-vertex graph and $k$ pairs of terminal vertices $(s_1,t_1), \ldots, (s_k,t_k)$, the $k$-Disjoint Shortest Paths ($k$-DSP)-problem asks whether there are $k$ pairwise vertex-disjoint paths $P_1,\ldots, P_k$ such that $P_i$ is a shortest $s_i$-$t_i$-path for each $i \in [k]$. Recently, Lochet [SODA 2021] provided an algorithm that solves $k$-DSP in $n^{O(k^{5^k})}$ time, answering a 20-year old question about the computational complexity of $k$-DSP for constant $k$. On the one hand, we present an improved $n^{O(k!k)}$-time algorithm based on a novel geometric view on this problem. For the special case $k=2$ on $m$-edge graphs, we show that the running time can be further reduced to $O(nm)$ by small modifications of the algorithm and a refined analysis. On the other hand, we show that $k$-DSP is W[1]-hard with respect to $k$, showing that the dependency of the degree of the polynomial running time on the parameter $k$ is presumably unavoidable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Who won? Winner Determination and Robustness in Liquid Democracy

Liquid democracy is a decision-making paradigm in which each agent can either vote directly for some alternative or (transitively) delegate its vote to another agent. To mitigate the issue of delegation cycles or the concentration of power, delegating agents might be allowed to specify multiple delegation options. Then, a (cycle-free) delegation is selected in which each delegating agent has exactly one representative. We study the winner determination problem for this setting, i.e., whether we can select a delegation such that a given alternative wins (or does not win). Moreover, we study the robustness of winning alternatives in two ways: First, we consider whether we can make a limited number of changes to the preferences cast by the agents such that a given alternative becomes a winner in one/in all delegations, and second, whether we can make a limited number of changes to a selected delegation to make a given alternative a winner.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

The Complexity of Gerrymandering Over Graphs: Paths and Trees

Roughly speaking, gerrymandering is the systematic manipulation of the boundaries of electoral districts to make a specific (political) party win as many districts as possible. While typically studied from a geographical point of view, addressing social network structures, the investigation of gerrymandering over graphs was recently initiated by Cohen-Zemach et al. [AAMAS 2018]. Settling three open questions of Ito et al. [AAMAS 2019], we classify the computational complexity of the NP-hard problem Gerrymandering over Graphs when restricted to paths and trees. Our results, which are mostly of negative nature (that is, worst-case hardness), in particular yield two complexity dichotomies for trees. For instance, the problem is polynomial-time solvable for two parties but becomes weakly NP-hard for three. Moreover, we show that the problem remains NP-hard even when the input graph is a path.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

An Adaptive Version of Brandes&#39; Algorithm for Betweenness Centrality

Betweenness centrality---measuring how many shortest paths pass through a vertex---is one of the most important network analysis concepts for assessing the relative importance of a vertex. The well-known algorithm of Brandes [J. Math. Sociol.~&#39;01] computes, on an $n$-vertex and $m$-edge graph, the betweenness centrality of all vertices in $O(nm)$ worst-case time. In later work, significant empirical speedups were achieved by preprocessing degree-one vertices and by graph partitioning based on cut vertices. We contribute an algorithmic treatment of degree-two vertices, which turns out to be much richer in mathematical structure than the case of degree-one vertices. Based on these three algorithmic ingredients, we provide a strengthened worst-case running time analysis for betweenness centrality algorithms. More specifically, we prove an adaptive running time bound $O(kn)$, where $k < m$ is the size of a minimum feedback edge set of the input graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Efficient Computation of Optimal Temporal Walks under Waiting-Time Constraints

Node connectivity plays a central role in temporal network analysis. We provide a comprehensive study of various concepts of walks in temporal graphs, that is, graphs with fixed vertex sets but edge sets changing over time. Taking into account the temporal aspect leads to a rich set of optimization criteria for &#34;shortest&#34; walks. Extending and significantly broadening state-of-the-art work of Wu et al. [IEEE TKDE 2016], we provide an algorithm for computing optimal walks that is capable to deal with various optimization criteria and any linear combination of these. It runs in $O (|V| + |E| \log |E|)$ time where $|V|$ is the number of vertices and $|E|$ is the number of time edges. A central distinguishing factor to Wu et al.&#39;s work is that our model allows to, motivated by real-world applications, respect waiting-time constraints for vertices, that is, the minimum and maximum waiting time allowed in intermediate vertices of a walk. Moreover, other than Wu et al. our algorithm also allows to search for walks that pass multiple subsequent edges in one time step, and it can optimize a richer set of optimization criteria. Our experimental studies indicate that our richer modeling can be achieved without significantly worsening the running time when compared to Wu et al.&#39;s algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On Reachable Assignments in Cycles and Cliques

The efficient and fair distribution of indivisible resources among agents is a common problem in the field of \emph{Multi-Agent-Systems}. We consider a graph-based version of this problem called Reachable Assignments, introduced by Gourves, Lesca, and Wilczynski [AAAI, 2017]. The input for this problem consists of a set of agents, a set of objects, the agent&#39;s preferences over the objects, a graph with the agents as vertices and edges encoding which agents can trade resources with each other, and an initial and a target distribution of the objects, where each agent owns exactly one object in each distribution. The question is then whether the target distribution is reachable via a sequence of rational trades. A trade is rational when the two participating agents are neighbors in the graph and both obtain an object they prefer over the object they previously held. We show that Reachable Assignments is NP-hard even when restricting the input graph to be a clique and develop an $O(n^3)$-time algorithm for the case where the input graph is a cycle with $n$ vertices.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Parameterized Algorithms for Power-Efficiently Connecting Wireless Sensor Networks: Theory and Experiments

We study an NP-hard problem motivated by energy-efficiently maintaining the connectivity of a symmetric wireless communication network: Given an edge-weighted $n$-vertex graph, find a connected spanning subgraph of minimum cost, where the cost is determined by letting each vertex pay the most expensive edge incident to it in the subgraph. On the negative side, we show that $o(\log n)$-approximating the difference $d$ between the optimal solution cost and a natural lower bound is NP-hard and that, under the Exponential Time Hypothesis, there are no exact algorithms running in $2^{o(n)}$ time or in $f(d)\cdot n^{O(1)}$ time for any computable function $f$. Moreover, we show that the special case of connecting $c$ network components with minimum additional cost generally cannot be polynomial-time reduced to instances of size $c^{O(1)}$ unless the polynomial-time hierarchy collapses. On the positive side, we provide an algorithm that reconnects $O(\log n)$ connected components with minimum additional cost in polynomial time. These algorithms are motivated by application scenarios of monitoring areas or where an existing sensor network may fall apart into several connected components due to sensor faults. In experiments, the algorithm outperforms CPLEX with known ILP formulations when $n$ is sufficiently large compared to $c$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Parameterized Complexity of Min-Power Asymmetric Connectivity

We investigate parameterized algorithms for the NP-hard problem Min-Power Asymmetric Connectivity (MinPAC) that has applications in wireless sensor networks. Given a directed arc-weighted graph, MinPAC asks for a strongly connected spanning subgraph minimizing the summed vertex costs. Here, the cost of each vertex is the weight of its heaviest outgoing arc in the chosen subgraph. We present linear-time algorithms for the cases where the number of strongly connected components in a so-called obligatory subgraph or the feedback edge number in the underlying undirected graph is constant. Complementing these results, we prove that the problem is W[2]-hard with respect to the solution cost, even on restricted graphs with one feedback arc and binary arc weights.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access