BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

André Nichterlein

André Nichterlein appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Data Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete MathematicsComputational Complexitymath.COSocial and Information NetworksMultiagent Systems

Catalog footprint

What is connected

20works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

20 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Density Matters: A Complexity Dichotomy of Deleting Edges to Bound Subgraph Density

We study $τ$-Bounded-Density Edge Deletion ($τ$-BDED), where given an undirected graph $G$, the task is to remove as few edges as possible to obtain a graph $G'$ where no subgraph of $G'$ has density more than $τ$. The density of a (sub)graph is the number of edges divided by the number of vertices. This problem was recently introduced and shown to be NP-hard for $τ\in \{2/3, 3/4, 1 + 1/25\}$, but polynomial-time solvable for $τ\in \{0,1/2,1\}$ [Bazgan et al., JCSS 2025]. We provide a complete dichotomy with respect to the target density $τ$: 1. If $2τ\in \mathbb{N}$ (half-integral target density) or $τ< 2/3$, then $τ$-BDED is polynomial-time solvable. 2. Otherwise, $τ$-BDED is NP-hard. We complement the NP-hardness with fixed-parameter tractability with respect to the treewidth of $G$. Moreover, for integral target density $τ\in \mathbb{N}$, we show $τ$-BDED to be solvable in randomized $O(m^{1 + o(1)})$ time. Our algorithmic results are based on a reduction to a new general flow problem on restricted networks that, depending on $τ$, can be solved via Maximum s-t-Flow or General Factors. We believe this connection between these variants of flow and matching to be of independent interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

Parameterized Lower Bounds for Problems in P via Fine-Grained Cross-Compositions

We provide a general framework to exclude parameterized running times of the form $O(\ell^β+ n^γ)$ for problems that have polynomial running time lower bounds under hypotheses from fine-grained complexity. Our framework is based on cross-compositions from parameterized complexity. We (conditionally) exclude running times of the form $O(\ell^{γ/{(γ-1)} - ε} + n^γ)$ for any $1<γ<2$ and $ε>0$ for the following problems: - Longest Common Subsequence: Given two length-$n$ strings and $\ell\in\mathbb{N}$, is there a common subsequence of length $\ell$? - Discrete Fréchet Distance: Given two lists of $n$ points each and $k\in \mathbb{N}$, is the Fréchet distance of the lists at most $k$? Here $\ell$ is the maximum number of points which one list is ahead of the other list in an optimum traversal. Moreover, we exclude running times $O(\ell^{{2γ}/{(γ-1)}-ε} + n^γ)$ for any $1<γ<3$ and $ε>0$ for: - Negative Triangle: Given an edge-weighted graph with $n$ vertices, is there a triangle whose sum of edge-weights is negative? Here $\ell$ is the order of a maximum connected component. - Triangle Collection: Given a vertex-colored graph with $n$ vertices, is there for each triple of colors a triangle whose vertices have these three colors? Here $\ell$ is the order of a maximum connected component. - 2nd Shortest Path: Given an $n$-vertex edge-weighted directed graph, two vertices $s$ and $t$, and $k \in \mathbb{N}$, has the second longest $s$-$t$-path length at most $k$? Here $\ell$ is the directed feedback vertex set. Except for 2nd Shortest Path all these running time bounds are tight, that is, algorithms with running time $O(\ell^{γ/{(γ-1)}} + n^γ)$ for any $1 < γ< 2$ and $O(\ell^{{2γ}/{(γ-1)}} + n^γ)$ for any $1 < γ< 3$, respectively, are known.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

There and Back Again: On Applying Data Reduction Rules by Undoing Others

Data reduction rules are an established method in the algorithmic toolbox for tackling computationally challenging problems. A data reduction rule is a polynomial-time algorithm that, given a problem instance as input, outputs an equivalent, typically smaller instance of the same problem. The application of data reduction rules during the preprocessing of problem instances allows in many cases to considerably shrink their size, or even solve them directly. Commonly, these data reduction rules are applied exhaustively and in some fixed order to obtain irreducible instances. It was often observed that by changing the order of the rules, different irreducible instances can be obtained. We propose to "undo" data reduction rules on irreducible instances, by which they become larger, and then subsequently apply data reduction rules again to shrink them. We show that this somewhat counter-intuitive approach can lead to significantly smaller irreducible instances. The process of undoing data reduction rules is not limited to "rolling back" data reduction rules applied to the instance during preprocessing. Instead, we formulate so-called backward rules, which essentially undo a data reduction rule, but without using any information about which data reduction rules were applied to it previously. In particular, based on the example of Vertex Cover we propose two methods applying backward rules to shrink the instances further. In our experiments we show that this way smaller irreducible instances consisting of real-world graphs from the SNAP and DIMACS datasets can be computed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Using a geometric lens to find k disjoint shortest paths

Given an undirected $n$-vertex graph and $k$ pairs of terminal vertices $(s_1,t_1), \ldots, (s_k,t_k)$, the $k$-Disjoint Shortest Paths ($k$-DSP)-problem asks whether there are $k$ pairwise vertex-disjoint paths $P_1,\ldots, P_k$ such that $P_i$ is a shortest $s_i$-$t_i$-path for each $i \in [k]$. Recently, Lochet [SODA 2021] provided an algorithm that solves $k$-DSP in $n^{O(k^{5^k})}$ time, answering a 20-year old question about the computational complexity of $k$-DSP for constant $k$. On the one hand, we present an improved $n^{O(k!k)}$-time algorithm based on a novel geometric view on this problem. For the special case $k=2$ on $m$-edge graphs, we show that the running time can be further reduced to $O(nm)$ by small modifications of the algorithm and a refined analysis. On the other hand, we show that $k$-DSP is W[1]-hard with respect to $k$, showing that the dependency of the degree of the polynomial running time on the parameter $k$ is presumably unavoidable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

An Adaptive Version of Brandes' Algorithm for Betweenness Centrality

Betweenness centrality---measuring how many shortest paths pass through a vertex---is one of the most important network analysis concepts for assessing the relative importance of a vertex. The well-known algorithm of Brandes [J. Math. Sociol.~'01] computes, on an $n$-vertex and $m$-edge graph, the betweenness centrality of all vertices in $O(nm)$ worst-case time. In later work, significant empirical speedups were achieved by preprocessing degree-one vertices and by graph partitioning based on cut vertices. We contribute an algorithmic treatment of degree-two vertices, which turns out to be much richer in mathematical structure than the case of degree-one vertices. Based on these three algorithmic ingredients, we provide a strengthened worst-case running time analysis for betweenness centrality algorithms. More specifically, we prove an adaptive running time bound $O(kn)$, where $k < m$ is the size of a minimum feedback edge set of the input graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Detecting and Enumerating Small Induced Subgraphs in $c$-Closed Graphs

Fox et al. [SIAM J. Comp. 2020] introduced a new parameter, called $c$-closure, for a parameterized study of clique enumeration problems. A graph $G$ is $c$-closed if every pair of vertices with at least $c$ common neighbors is adjacent. The $c$-closure of $G$ is the smallest $c$ such that $G$ is $c$-closed. We systematically explore the impact of $c$-closure on the computational complexity of detecting and enumerating small induced subgraphs. More precisely, for each graph $H$ on three or four vertices, we investigate parameterized polynomial-time algorithms for detecting $H$ and for enumerating all occurrences of $H$ in a given $c$-closed graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Efficient Computation of Optimal Temporal Walks under Waiting-Time Constraints

Node connectivity plays a central role in temporal network analysis. We provide a comprehensive study of various concepts of walks in temporal graphs, that is, graphs with fixed vertex sets but edge sets changing over time. Taking into account the temporal aspect leads to a rich set of optimization criteria for "shortest" walks. Extending and significantly broadening state-of-the-art work of Wu et al. [IEEE TKDE 2016], we provide an algorithm for computing optimal walks that is capable to deal with various optimization criteria and any linear combination of these. It runs in $O (|V| + |E| \log |E|)$ time where $|V|$ is the number of vertices and $|E|$ is the number of time edges. A central distinguishing factor to Wu et al.'s work is that our model allows to, motivated by real-world applications, respect waiting-time constraints for vertices, that is, the minimum and maximum waiting time allowed in intermediate vertices of a walk. Moreover, other than Wu et al. our algorithm also allows to search for walks that pass multiple subsequent edges in one time step, and it can optimize a richer set of optimization criteria. Our experimental studies indicate that our richer modeling can be achieved without significantly worsening the running time when compared to Wu et al.'s algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On 2-Clubs in Graph-Based Data Clustering: Theory and Algorithm Engineering

Editing a graph into a disjoint union of clusters is a standard optimization task in graph-based data clustering. Here, complementing classic work where the clusters shall be cliques, we focus on clusters that shall be 2-clubs, that is, subgraphs of diameter two. This naturally leads to the two NP-hard problems 2-Club Cluster Editing (the allowed editing operations are edge insertion and edge deletion) and 2-Club Cluster Vertex Deletion (the allowed editing operations are vertex deletions). Answering an open question from the literature, we show that 2-Club Cluster Editing is W[2]-hard with respect to the number of edge modifications, thus contrasting the fixed-parameter tractability result for the classic Cluster Editing problem (considering cliques instead of 2-clubs). Then focusing on 2-Club Cluster Vertex Deletion, which is easily seen to be fixed-parameter tractable, we show that under standard complexity-theoretic assumptions it does not have a polynomial-size problem kernel when parameterized by the number of vertex deletions. Nevertheless, we develop several effective data reduction and pruning rules, resulting in a competitive solver, clearly outperforming a standard CPLEX solver in most instances of an established biological test data set.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Parameterized Algorithms for Power-Efficiently Connecting Wireless Sensor Networks: Theory and Experiments

We study an NP-hard problem motivated by energy-efficiently maintaining the connectivity of a symmetric wireless communication network: Given an edge-weighted $n$-vertex graph, find a connected spanning subgraph of minimum cost, where the cost is determined by letting each vertex pay the most expensive edge incident to it in the subgraph. On the negative side, we show that $o(\log n)$-approximating the difference $d$ between the optimal solution cost and a natural lower bound is NP-hard and that, under the Exponential Time Hypothesis, there are no exact algorithms running in $2^{o(n)}$ time or in $f(d)\cdot n^{O(1)}$ time for any computable function $f$. Moreover, we show that the special case of connecting $c$ network components with minimum additional cost generally cannot be polynomial-time reduced to instances of size $c^{O(1)}$ unless the polynomial-time hierarchy collapses. On the positive side, we provide an algorithm that reconnects $O(\log n)$ connected components with minimum additional cost in polynomial time. These algorithms are motivated by application scenarios of monitoring areas or where an existing sensor network may fall apart into several connected components due to sensor faults. In experiments, the algorithm outperforms CPLEX with known ILP formulations when $n$ is sufficiently large compared to $c$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Parameterized Complexity of Min-Power Asymmetric Connectivity

We investigate parameterized algorithms for the NP-hard problem Min-Power Asymmetric Connectivity (MinPAC) that has applications in wireless sensor networks. Given a directed arc-weighted graph, MinPAC asks for a strongly connected spanning subgraph minimizing the summed vertex costs. Here, the cost of each vertex is the weight of its heaviest outgoing arc in the chosen subgraph. We present linear-time algorithms for the cases where the number of strongly connected components in a so-called obligatory subgraph or the feedback edge number in the underlying undirected graph is constant. Complementing these results, we prove that the problem is W[2]-hard with respect to the solution cost, even on restricted graphs with one feedback arc and binary arc weights.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Power of Data Reduction for Matching

Finding maximum-cardinality matchings in undirected graphs is arguably one of the most central graph primitives. For $m$-edge and $n$-vertex graphs, it is well-known to be solvable in $O(m\sqrt{n})$ time; however, for several applications this running time is still too slow. We investigate how linear-time (and almost linear-time) data reduction (used as preprocessing) can alleviate the situation. More specifically, we focus on (almost) linear-time kernelization. We start a deeper and systematic study both for general graphs and for bipartite graphs. Our data reduction algorithms easily comply (in form of preprocessing) with every solution strategy (exact, approximate, heuristic), thus making them attractive in various settings.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Prices Matter for the Parameterized Complexity of Shift Bribery

In the Shift Bribery problem, we are given an election (based on preference orders), a preferred candidate $p$, and a budget. The goal is to ensure that $p$ wins by shifting $p$ higher in some voters' preference orders. However, each such shift request comes at a price (depending on the voter and on the extent of the shift) and we must not exceed the given budget. We study the parameterized computational complexity of Shift Bribery with respect to a number of parameters (pertaining to the nature of the solution sought and the size of the election) and several classes of price functions. When we parameterize Shift Bribery by the number of affected voters, then for each of our voting rules (Borda, Maximin, Copeland) the problem is W[2]-hard. If, instead, we parameterize by the number of positions by which $p$ is shifted in total,then the problem is fixed-parameter tractable for Borda and Maximin,and is W[1]-hard for Copeland. If we parameterize by the budget, then the results depend on the price function class. We also show that Shift Bribery tends to be tractable when parameterized by the number of voters, but that the results for the number of candidates are more enigmatic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Win-Win Kernelization for Degree Sequence Completion Problems

We study provably effective and efficient data reduction for a class of NP-hard graph modification problems based on vertex degree properties. We show fixed-parameter tractability for NP-hard graph completion (that is, edge addition) cases while we show that there is no hope to achieve analogous results for the corresponding vertex or edge deletion versions. Our algorithms are based on transforming graph completion problems into efficiently solvable number problems and exploiting f-factor computations for translating the results back into the graph setting. Our core observation is that we encounter a win-win situation: either the number of edge additions is small or the problem is polynomial-time solvable. This approach helps in answering an open question by Mathieson and Szeider [JCSS 2012] concerning the polynomial kernelizability of Degree Constraint Edge Addition and leads to a general method of approaching polynomial-time preprocessing for a wider class of degree sequence completion problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Parameterized Inapproximability of Target Set Selection and Generalizations

In this paper, we consider the Target Set Selection problem: given a graph and a threshold value $thr(v)$ for any vertex $v$ of the graph, find a minimum size vertex-subset to "activate" s.t. all the vertices of the graph are activated at the end of the propagation process. A vertex $v$ is activated during the propagation process if at least $thr(v)$ of its neighbors are activated. This problem models several practical issues like faults in distributed networks or word-to-mouth recommendations in social networks. We show that for any functions $f$ and $ρ$ this problem cannot be approximated within a factor of $ρ(k)$ in $f(k) \cdot n^{O(1)}$ time, unless FPT = W[P], even for restricted thresholds (namely constant and majority thresholds). We also study the cardinality constraint maximization and minimization versions of the problem for which we prove similar hardness results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Constant-factor approximations for Capacitated Arc Routing without triangle inequality

Given an undirected graph with edge costs and edge demands, the Capacitated Arc Routing problem (CARP) asks for minimum-cost routes for equal-capacity vehicles so as to satisfy all demands. Constant-factor polynomial-time approximation algorithms were proposed for CARP with triangle inequality, while CARP was claimed to be NP-hard to approximate within any constant factor in general. Correcting this claim, we show that any factor α approximation for CARP with triangle inequality yields a factor α approximation for the general CARP.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Improved Upper and Lower Bound Heuristics for Degree Anonymization in Social Networks

Motivated by a strongly growing interest in anonymizing social network data, we investigate the NP-hard Degree Anonymization problem: given an undirected graph, the task is to add a minimum number of edges such that the graph becomes k-anonymous. That is, for each vertex there have to be at least k-1 other vertices of exactly the same degree. The model of degree anonymization has been introduced by Liu and Terzi [ACM SIGMOD'08], who also proposed and evaluated a two-phase heuristic. We present an enhancement of this heuristic, including new algorithms for each phase which significantly improve on the previously known theoretical and practical running times. Moreover, our algorithms are optimized for large-scale social networks and provide upper and lower bounds for the optimal solution. Notably, on about 26 % of the real-world data we provide (provably) optimal solutions; whereas in the other cases our upper bounds significantly improve on known heuristic solutions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Parameterized Approximability of Maximizing the Spread of Influence in Networks

In this paper, we consider the problem of maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. Given a graph with a threshold value~$thr(v)$ attached to each vertex~$v$, the spread of influence is modeled as follows: A vertex~$v$ becomes "active" (influenced) if at least $thr(v)$ of its neighbors are active. In the corresponding optimization problem the objective is then to find a fixed number of vertices to activate such that the number of activated vertices at the end of the propagation process is maximum. We show that this problem is strongly inapproximable in fpt-time with respect to (w.r.t.) parameter $k$ even for very restrictive thresholds. In the case that the threshold of each vertex equals its degree, we prove that the problem is inapproximable in polynomial time and it becomes $r(n)$-approximable in fpt-time w.r.t. parameter $k$ for any strictly increasing function $r$. Moreover, we show that the decision version is W[1]-hard w.r.t. parameter $k$ but becomes fixed-parameter tractable on bounded degree graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

On Structural Parameterizations for the 2-Club Problem

The NP-hard 2-Club problem is, given an undirected graph G=(V,E) and l\in N, to decide whether there is a vertex set S\subseteq V of size at least l such that the induced subgraph G[S] has diameter at most two. We make progress towards a systematic classification of the complexity of 2-Club with respect to a hierarchy of prominent structural graph parameters. First, we present the following tight NP-hardness results: 2-Club is NP-hard on graphs that become bipartite by deleting one vertex, on graphs that can be covered by three cliques, and on graphs with domination number two and diameter three. Then, we consider the parameter h-index of the input graph. This parameter is motivated by real-world instances and the fact that 2-Club is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the larger parameter maximum degree. We present an algorithm that solves 2-Club in |V|^{f(k)} time with k being the h-index. By showing W[1]-hardness for this parameter, we provide evidence that the above algorithm cannot be improved to a fixed-parameter algorithm. Furthermore, the reduction used for this hardness result can be modified to show that 2-Club is NP-hard if the input graph has constant degeneracy. Finally, we show that 2-Club is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to distance to cographs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

NP-Hardness and Fixed-Parameter Tractability of Realizing Degree Sequences with Directed Acyclic Graphs

In graph realization problems one is given a degree sequence and the task is to decide whether there is a graph whose vertex degrees match to the given sequence. This realization problem is known to be polynomial-time solvable when the graph is directed or undirected. In contrary, we show NP-completeness for the problem of realizing a given sequence of pairs of positive integers (representing indegrees and outdegrees) with a directed acyclic graph, answering an open question of Berger and Müller-Hannemann [FCT 2011]. Furthermore, we classify the problem as fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the parameter "maximum degree".

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

On the Parameterized and Approximation Hardness of Metric Dimension

The NP-hard Metric Dimension problem is to decide for a given graph G and a positive integer k whether there is a vertex subset of size at most k that separates all vertex pairs in G. Herein, a vertex v separates a pair {u,w} if the distance (length of a shortest path) between v and u is different from the distance of v and w. We give a polynomial-time computable reduction from the Bipartite Dominating Set problem to Metric Dimension on maximum degree three graphs such that there is a one-to-one correspondence between the solution sets of both problems. There are two main consequences of this: First, it proves that Metric Dimension on maximum degree three graphs is W[2]-complete with respect to the parameter k. This answers an open question concerning the parameterized complexity of Metric Dimension posed by Díaz et al. [ESA'12] and already mentioned by Lokshtanov [Dagstuhl seminar, 2009]. Additionally, it implies that Metric Dimension cannot be solved in n^{o(k)} time, unless the assumption FPT \neq W[1] fails. This proves that a trivial n^{O(k)} algorithm is probably asymptotically optimal. Second, as Bipartite Dominating Set is inapproximable within o(log n), it follows that Metric Dimension on maximum degree three graphs is also inapproximable by a factor of o(log n), unless NP=P. This strengthens the result of Hauptmann et al. [JDA 2012] who proved APX-hardness on bounded-degree graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access