BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Matteo Sordello

Matteo Sordello contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Applicationsmath.PRMethodology

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A Test for Differential Ascertainment in Case-Control Studies with Application to Child Maltreatment

We propose a method to test for the presence of differential ascertainment in case-control studies, when data are collected by multiple sources. We show that, when differential ascertainment is present, the use of only the observed cases leads to severe bias in the computation of the odds ratio. We can alleviate the effect of such bias using the estimates that our method of testing for differential ascertainment naturally provides. We apply it to a dataset obtained from the National Violent Death Reporting System, with the goal of checking for the presence of differential ascertainment by race in the count of deaths caused by child maltreatment.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

A Bernstein type inequality for sums of selections from three dimensional arrays

We consider the three dimensional array $\mathcal{A} = \{a_{i,j,k}\}_{1\le i,j,k \le n}$, with $a_{i,j,k} \in [0,1]$, and the two random statistics $T_{1}:= \sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n a_{i,j,σ(i)}$ and $T_{2}:= \sum_{i=1}^{n} a_{i,σ(i),π(i)}$, where $σ$ and $π$ are chosen independently from the set of permutations of $\{1,2,\ldots,n \}.$ These can be viewed as natural three dimensional generalizations of the statistic $T_{3}=\sum_{i=1}^{n} a_{i,σ(i)}$, considered by Hoeffding \cite{Hoe51}. Here we give Bernstein type concentration inequalities for $T_{1}$ and $T_{2}$ by extending the argument for concentration of $T_{3}$ by Chatterjee \cite{Cha05}.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access