Source author record

Masoud Zarepisheh

Masoud Zarepisheh appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

The fixed-point iteration method for IMRT optimization with truncated dose deposition coefficient matrix

In the treatment plan optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), dose-deposition coefficient (DDC) matrix is often pre-computed to parameterize the dose contribution to each voxel in the volume of interest from each beamlet of unit intensity. However, due to the limitation of computer memory and the requirement on computational efficiency, in practice matrix elements of small values are usually truncated, which inevitably compromises the quality of the resulting plan. A fixed-point iteration scheme has been applied in IMRT optimization to solve this problem, which has been reported to be effective and efficient based on the observations of the numerical experiments. In this paper, we aim to point out the mathematics behind this scheme and to answer the following three questions: 1) whether the fixed-point iteration algorithm converges or not? 2) when it converges, whether the fixed point solution is same as the original solution obtained with the complete DDC matrix? 3) if not the same, whether the fixed point solution is more accurate than the naive solution of the truncated problem obtained without the fixed-point iteration? To answer these questions, we first performed mathematical analysis and deductions using a simplified fluence map optimization (FMO) model. Then we conducted numerical experiments on a head-and-neck patient case using both the simplified and the original FMO model. Both our mathematical analysis and numerical experiments demonstrate that with proper DDC matrix truncation, the fixed-point iteration can converge. Even though the converged solution is not the one that we obtain with the complete DDC matrix, the fixed-point iteration scheme could significantly improve the plan accuracy compared with the solution to the truncated problem obtained without the fixed-point iteration.

preprint2012arXiv

A Multi-Criteria Framework with Voxel-Dependent Parameters for Radiotherapy Treatment Plan Optimization

In a treatment plan optimization problem for radiotherapy, a clinically acceptable plan is usually generated by an optimization process with weighting factors or reference doses adjusted for organs. Recent discoveries indicate that adjusting parameters associated with each voxel may lead to better plan quality. However, it is still unclear regarding the mathematical reasons behind it. To answer questions related to this problem, we establish in this work a new mathematical framework equipped with two theorems. The new framework clarifies the different consequences of adjusting organ-dependent and voxel-dependent parameters for the treatment plan optimization of radiation therapy, as well as the different effects of adjusting weighting factors versus reference doses in the optimization process. The main discoveries are threefold: 1) While in the organ-based model the selection of the objective function has an impact on the quality of the optimized plans, this is no longer an issue for the voxel-based model since the entire Pareto surface could be generated regardless the specific form of the objective function as long as it satisfies certain mathematical conditions; 2) A larger Pareto surface is explored by adjusting voxel-dependent parameters than by adjusting organ-dependent parameters, possibly allowing for the generation of plans with better trade-offs among different clinical objectives; 3) Adjusting voxel weighting factors is preferred to adjusting the voxel reference doses since the Pareto optimality can be maintained.