Researcher profile

Mark McDonald

Mark McDonald contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Learning-Based Stopping Power Mapping on Dual Energy CT for Proton Radiation Therapy

Purpose: Dual-energy CT (DECT) has been used to derive relative stopping power (RSP) map by obtaining the energy dependence of photon interactions. The DECT-derived RSP maps could potentially be compromised by image noise levels and the severity of artifacts when using physics-based mapping techniques, which would affect subsequent clinical applications. This work presents a noise-robust learning-based method to predict RSP maps from DECT for proton radiation therapy. Methods: The proposed method uses a residual attention cycle-consistent generative adversarial (CycleGAN) network. CycleGAN were used to let the DECT-to-RSP mapping be close to a one-to-one mapping by introducing an inverse RSP-to-DECT mapping. We retrospectively investigated 20 head-and-neck cancer patients with DECT scans in proton radiation therapy simulation. Ground truth RSP values were assigned by calculation based on chemical compositions, and acted as learning targets in the training process for DECT datasets, and were evaluated against results from the proposed method using a leave-one-out cross-validation strategy. Results: The predicted RSP maps showed an average normalized mean square error (NMSE) of 2.83% across the whole body volume, and average mean error (ME) less than 3% in all volumes of interest (VOIs). With additional simulated noise added in DECT datasets, the proposed method still maintained a comparable performance, while the physics-based stoichiometric method suffered degraded inaccuracy from increased noise level. The average differences in DVH metrics for clinical target volumes (CTVs) were less than 0.2 Gy for D95% and Dmax with no statistical significance. Conclusion: These results strongly indicate the high accuracy of RSP maps predicted by our machine-learning-based method and show its potential feasibility for proton treatment planning and dose calculation.

preprint2020arXiv

Learning-Based Synthetic Dual Energy CT Imaging from Single Energy CT for Stopping Power Ratio Calculation in Proton Radiation Therapy

Purpose: Dual-energy CT (DECT) has been shown to derive stopping power ratio (SPR) map with higher accuracy than conventional single energy CT (SECT) by obtaining the energy dependence of photon interactions. However, DECT is not as widely implemented as SECT in proton radiation therapy simulation. This work presents a learning-based method to synthetize DECT images from SECT for proton radiation therapy. Methods: The proposed method uses a residual attention generative adversarial network. Residual blocks with attention gates were used to force the model focus on the difference between DECT maps and SECT images. To evaluate the accuracy of the method, we retrospectively investigated 20 head-and-neck cancer patients with both DECT and SECT scans available. The high and low energy CT images acquired from DECT acted as learning targets in the training process for SECT datasets and were evaluated against results from the proposed method using a leave-one-out cross-validation strategy. To evaluate our method in the context of a practical application, we generated SPR maps from sDECT using physics-based dual-energy stoichiometric method and compared the maps to those generated from DECT. Results: The synthesized DECT images showed an average mean absolute error around 30 Hounsfield Unit (HU) across the whole-body volume. The corresponding SPR maps generated from synthetic DECT showed an average normalized mean square error of about 1% with reduced noise level and artifacts than those from original DECT. Conclusions: The accuracy of the synthesized DECT image by our machine-learning-based method was evaluated on head and neck patient, and potential feasibility for proton treatment planning and dose calculation was shown by generating SPR map using the synthesized DECT.