BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Mark Burgess

Mark Burgess contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Multiagent SystemsDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computingcs.CYgr-qcNetworking and Internet ArchitectureSocial and Information NetworksSoftware Engineering

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
10works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Continuous Integration of Data Histories into Consistent Namespaces

We describe a policy-based approach to the scaling of shared data services, using a hierarchy of calibrated data pipelines to automate the continuous integration of data flows. While there is no unique solution to the problem of time order, we show how to use a fair interleaving to reproduce reliable `latest version' semantics in a controlled way, by trading locality for temporal resolution. We thus establish an invariant global ordering from a spanning tree over all shards, with controlled scalability. This forms a versioned coordinate system (or versioned namespace) with consistent semantics and self-protecting rate-limited versioning, analogous to publish-subscribe addressing schemes for Content Delivery Network (CDN) or Name Data Networking (NDN) schemes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On The Scale Dependence and Spacetime Dimension of the Internet with Causal Sets

A statistical measure of dimension is used to compute the effective average space dimension for the Internet and other graphs, based on typed edges (links) from an ensemble of starting points. The method is applied to CAIDA's ITDK data for the Internet. The effective dimension at different scales is calibrated to the conventional Euclidean dimension using low dimensional hypercubes. Internet spacetime has a 'foamy' multi-scale containment hierarchy, with interleaving semantic types. There is an emergent scale for approximate long range order in the device node spectrum, but this is not evident at the AS level, where there is finite distance containment. Statistical dimension is thus a locally varying measure, which is scale-dependent, giving an visual analogy for the hidden scale-dependent dimensions of Kaluza-Klein theories. The characteristic exterior dimensions of the Internet lie between 1.66 +- 0.00 and 6.12 +- 0.00, and maximal interior dimensions rise to 7.7.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Candidate Software Process Flaws for the Boeing 737 Max MCAS Algorithm and Risks for a Proposed Upgrade

By reasoning about the claims and speculations promised as part of the public discourse, we analyze the hypothesis that flaws in software engineering played a critical role in the Boeing 737 MCAS incidents. We use promise-based reasoning to discuss how, from an outsider's perspective, one may assemble clues about what went wrong. Rather than looking for a Rational Alternative Design (RAD), as suggested by Wendel, we look for candidate flaws in the software process. We describe four such potential flaws. Recently, Boeing has circulated information on its envisaged MCAS algorithm upgrade. We cast this as a promise to resolve the flaws, i.e. to provide a RAD for the B737 Max. We offer an assessment of B-Max-New based on the public discourse.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Information and Causality in Promise Theory

The explicit link between Promise Theory and Information Theory, while perhaps obvious, is laid out explicitly here. It's shown how causally related observations of promised behaviours relate to the probabilistic formulation of causal information in Shannon's theory, and thus clarify the meaning of autonomy or causal independence, and further the connection between information and causal sets. Promise Theory helps to make clear a number of assumptions which are commonly taken for granted in causal descriptions. The concept of a promise is hard to escape. It serves as proxy for intent, whether a priori or by inference, and it is intrinsic to the interpretations of observations in the latter.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Spacetime-Entangled Networks (I) Relativity and Observability of Stepwise Consensus

Consensus protocols can be an effective tool for synchronizing small amounts of data over small regions. We describe the concept and implementation of entangled links, applied to data transmission, using the framework of Promise Theory as a tool to help bring certainty to distributed consensus. Entanglement describes co-dependent evolution of state. Networks formed by entanglement of agents keep certain promises: they deliver sequential messages, end-to-end, in order, and with atomic confirmation of delivery to both ends of the link. These properties can be used recursively to assure a hierarchy of conditional promises at any scale. This is a useful property where a consensus of state or `common knowledge' is required. We intentionally straddle theory and implementation in this discussion.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Spacetimes with Semantics (II), Scaling of agency, semantics, and tenancy

Using Promise Theory as a calculus, I review how to define agency in a scalable way, for the purpose of understanding semantic spacetimes. By following simple scaling rules, replacing individual agents with `super-agents' (sub-spaces), it is shown how agency can be scaled both dynamically and semantically. The notion of occupancy and tenancy, or how space is used and filled in different ways, is also defined, showing how spacetime can be shared between independent parties, both by remote association and local encapsulation. I describe how to build up dynamic and semantic continuity, by joining discrete individual atoms and molecules of space into quasi-continuous lattices.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

A Promise Theory Perspective on Data Networks

Networking is undergoing a transformation throughout our industry. The need for scalable network control and automation shifts the focus from hardware driven products with ad hoc control to Software Defined Networks. This process is now well underway. In this paper, we adopt the perspective of the Promise Theory to examine the current and future states of networking technologies. The goal is to see beyond specific technologies, topologies and approaches and define principles. Promise Theory's bottom-up modeling has been applied to server management for many years and lends itself to principles of self-healing, scalability and robustness.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Promises, Impositions, and other Directionals

Promises, impositions, proposals, predictions, and suggestions are categorized as voluntary co-operational methods. The class of voluntary co-operational methods is included in the class of so-called directionals. Directionals are mechanisms supporting the mutual coordination of autonomous agents. Notations are provided capable of expressing residual fragments of directionals. An extensive example, involving promises about the suitability of programs for tasks imposed on the promisee is presented. The example illustrates the dynamics of promises and more specifically the corresponding mechanism of trust updating and credibility updating. Trust levels and credibility levels then determine the way certain promises and impositions are handled. The ubiquity of promises and impositions is further demonstrated with two extensive examples involving human behaviour: an artificial example about an agent planning a purchase, and a realistic example describing technology mediated interaction concerning the solution of pay station failure related problems arising for an agent intending to leave the parking area.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Spacetimes with Semantics

Relationships between objects constitute our notion of space. When these relationships change we interpret this as the passage of time. Observer interpretations are essential to the way we understand these relationships. Hence observer semantics are an integral part of what we mean by spacetime. Semantics make up the essential difference in how one describes and uses the concept of space in physics, chemistry, biology and technology. In these notes, I have tried to assemble what seems to be a set of natural, and pragmatic, considerations about discrete, finite spacetimes, to unify descriptions of these areas. It reviews familiar notions of spacetime, and brings them together into a less familiar framework of promise theory (autonomous agents), in order to illuminate the goal of encoding the semantics of observers into a description of spacetime itself. Autonomous agents provide an exacting atomic and local model for finite spacetime, which quickly reveals the issues of incomplete information and non-locality. From this we should be able to reconstruct all other notions of spacetime. The aim of this exercise is to apply related tools and ideas to an initial unification of real and artificial spaces, e.g. databases and information webs with natural spacetime. By reconstructing these spaces from autonomous agents, we may better understand naming and coordinatization of semantic spaces, from crowds and swarms to datacentres and libraries, as well as the fundamental arena of natural science.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access