Researcher profile

Mariya Doneva

Mariya Doneva contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

CRUNet-MR-Univ: A Foundation Model for Diverse Cardiac MRI Reconstruction

In recent years, deep learning has attracted increasing attention in the field of Cardiac MRI (CMR) reconstruction due to its superior performance over traditional methods, particularly in handling higher acceleration factors, highlighting its potential for real-world clinical applications. However, current deep learning methods remain limited in generalizability. CMR scans exhibit wide variability in image contrast, sampling patterns, scanner vendors, anatomical structures, and disease types. Most existing models are designed to handle only a single or narrow subset of these variations, leading to performance degradation when faced with distribution shifts. Therefore, it is beneficial to develop a unified model capable of generalizing across diverse CMR scenarios. To this end, we propose CRUNet-MR-Univ, a foundation model that leverages spatio-temporal correlations and prompt-based priors to effectively handle the full diversity of CMR scans. Our approach consistently outperforms baseline methods across a wide range of settings, highlighting its effectiveness and promise.

preprint2020arXiv

SURE-based Automatic Parameter Selection For ESPIRiT Calibration

Purpose: Parallel imaging methods in MRI have resulted in faster acquisition times and improved noise performance. ESPIRiT is one such technique that estimates coil sensitivity maps from the auto-calibration region using an eigenvalue-based method. This method requires choosing several parameters for the the map estimation. Even though ESPIRiT is fairly robust to these parameter choices, occasionally, poor selection can result in reduced performance. The purpose of this work is to automatically select parameters in ESPIRiT for more robust and consistent performance across a variety of exams. Theory and Methods: Stein's unbiased risk estimate (SURE) is a method of calculating an unbiased estimate of the mean squared error of an estimator under certain assumptions. We show that this can be used to estimate the performance of ESPIRiT. We derive and demonstrate the use of SURE to optimize ESPIRiT parameter selection. Results: Simulations show SURE to be an accurate estimator of the mean squared error. SURE is then used to optimize ESPIRiT parameters to yield maps that are optimal in a denoising/data-consistency sense. This improves g-factor performance without causing undesirable attenuation. In-vivo experiments verify the reliability of this method. Conclusion: Simulation experiments demonstrate that SURE is an accurate estimate of expected mean squared error. Using SURE to determine ESPIRiT parameters allows for automatic parameter selections.In-vivo results are consistent with simulation and theoretical results.

preprint2019arXiv

Spiral Blurring Correction with Water-Fat Separation for Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting in the Breast

PURPOSE: Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) with spiral readout enables rapid quantification of tissue relaxation times. However, it is prone to blurring due to off-resonance effects. Hence, fat blurring into adjacent regions might prevent identification of small tumors by their quantitative T1 and T2 values. This study aims to correct for the blurring artifacts, thereby enabling fast quantitative mapping in the female breast. METHODS: The impact of fat blurring on spiral MRF results was first assessed by simulations. Then, MRF was combined with 3-point Dixon water-fat separation and spiral blurring correction based on conjugate phase reconstruction. The approach was assessed in phantom experiments and compared to Cartesian reference measurements, namely inversion recovery (IR), multi-echo spin echo (MESE) and Cartesian MRF, by normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) and standard deviation (STD) calculations. Feasibility is further demonstrated in-vivo for quantitative breast measurements of 6 healthy female volunteers, age range 24-31 years. RESULTS: In the phantom experiment, the blurring correction reduced the NRMSE per phantom vial on average from 16% to 8% for T1 and from 18% to 11% for T2 when comparing spiral MRF to IR/MESE sequences. When comparing to Cartesian MRF, the NRMSE reduced from 15% to 8% for T1 and from 12% to 7% for T2. Furthermore, STDs decreased. In-vivo, the blurring correction removed fat bias on T1/T2 from a rim of about 7-8 mm width adjacent to fatty structures. CONCLUSION: The blurring correction for spiral MRF yields improved quantitative maps in the presence of water and fat.