BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Mario Peruggia

Mario Peruggia contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
ApplicationsMethodologystat.OT

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Rediscovering a little known fact about the t-test and the F-test: Algebraic, Geometric, Distributional and Graphical Considerations

We discuss the role that the null hypothesis should play in the construction of a test statistic used to make a decision about that hypothesis. To construct the test statistic for a point null hypothesis about a binomial proportion, a common recommendation is to act as if the null hypothesis is true. We argue that, on the surface, the one-sample t-test of a point null hypothesis about a Gaussian population mean does not appear to follow the recommendation. We show how simple algebraic manipulations of the usual t-statistic lead to an equivalent test procedure consistent with the recommendation. We provide geometric intuition regarding this equivalence and we consider extensions to testing nested hypotheses in Gaussian linear models. We discuss an application to graphical residual diagnostics where the form of the test statistic makes a practical difference. By examining the formulation of the test statistic from multiple perspectives in this familiar example, we provide simple, concrete illustrations of some important issues that can guide the formulation of effective solutions to more complex statistical problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Anchored Bayesian Gaussian Mixture Models

Finite mixtures are a flexible modeling tool for irregularly shaped densities and samples from heterogeneous populations. When modeling with mixtures using an exchangeable prior on the component features, the component labels are arbitrary and are indistinguishable in posterior analysis. This makes it impossible to attribute any meaningful interpretation to the marginal posterior distributions of the component features. We propose a model in which a small number of observations are assumed to arise from some of the labeled component densities. The resulting model is not exchangeable, allowing inference on the component features without post-processing. Our method assigns meaning to the component labels at the modeling stage and can be justified as a data-dependent informative prior on the labelings. We show that our method produces interpretable results, often (but not always) similar to those resulting from relabeling algorithms, with the added benefit that the marginal inferences originate directly from a well specified probability model rather than a post hoc manipulation. We provide asymptotic results leading to practical guidelines for model selection that are motivated by maximizing prior information about the class labels and demonstrate our method on real and simulated data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Bayesian Synthesis: Combining subjective analyses, with an application to ozone data

Bayesian model averaging enables one to combine the disparate predictions of a number of models in a coherent fashion, leading to superior predictive performance. The improvement in performance arises from averaging models that make different predictions. In this work, we tap into perhaps the biggest driver of different predictions---different analysts---in order to gain the full benefits of model averaging. In a standard implementation of our method, several data analysts work independently on portions of a data set, eliciting separate models which are eventually updated and combined through a specific weighting method. We call this modeling procedure Bayesian Synthesis. The methodology helps to alleviate concerns about the sizable gap between the foundational underpinnings of the Bayesian paradigm and the practice of Bayesian statistics. In experimental work we show that human modeling has predictive performance superior to that of many automatic modeling techniques, including AIC, BIC, Smoothing Splines, CART, Bagged CART, Bayes CART, BMA and LARS, and only slightly inferior to that of BART. We also show that Bayesian Synthesis further improves predictive performance. Additionally, we examine the predictive performance of a simple average across analysts, which we dub Convex Synthesis, and find that it also produces an improvement.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access