BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Mario Geiger

Mario Geiger contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine Learningcond-mat.dis-nnArtificial Intelligencephysics.comp-phBiological PhysicsComputational GeometryComputer Visioncond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.softNeural and Evolutionary Computingphysics.chem-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
11topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Cracking the Quantum Scaling Limit with Machine Learned Electron Densities

A long-standing goal of science is to accurately solve the Schrödinger equation for large molecular systems. The poor scaling of current quantum chemistry algorithms on classical computers imposes an effective limit of about a few dozen atoms for which we can calculate molecular electronic structure. We present a machine learning (ML) method to break through this scaling limit and make quantum chemistry calculations of very large systems possible. We show that Euclidean Neural Networks can be trained to predict the electron density with high fidelity from limited data. Learning the electron density allows us to train a machine learning model on small systems and make accurate predictions on large ones. We show that this ML electron density model can break through the quantum scaling limit and calculate the electron density of systems of thousands of atoms with quantum accuracy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

e3nn: Euclidean Neural Networks

We present e3nn, a generalized framework for creating E(3) equivariant trainable functions, also known as Euclidean neural networks. e3nn naturally operates on geometry and geometric tensors that describe systems in 3D and transform predictably under a change of coordinate system. The core of e3nn are equivariant operations such as the TensorProduct class or the spherical harmonics functions that can be composed to create more complex modules such as convolutions and attention mechanisms. These core operations of e3nn can be used to efficiently articulate Tensor Field Networks, 3D Steerable CNNs, Clebsch-Gordan Networks, SE(3) Transformers and other E(3) equivariant networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

E(3)-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Data-Efficient and Accurate Interatomic Potentials

This work presents Neural Equivariant Interatomic Potentials (NequIP), an E(3)-equivariant neural network approach for learning interatomic potentials from ab-initio calculations for molecular dynamics simulations. While most contemporary symmetry-aware models use invariant convolutions and only act on scalars, NequIP employs E(3)-equivariant convolutions for interactions of geometric tensors, resulting in a more information-rich and faithful representation of atomic environments. The method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on a challenging and diverse set of molecules and materials while exhibiting remarkable data efficiency. NequIP outperforms existing models with up to three orders of magnitude fewer training data, challenging the widely held belief that deep neural networks require massive training sets. The high data efficiency of the method allows for the construction of accurate potentials using high-order quantum chemical level of theory as reference and enables high-fidelity molecular dynamics simulations over long time scales.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A General Theory of Equivariant CNNs on Homogeneous Spaces

We present a general theory of Group equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks (G-CNNs) on homogeneous spaces such as Euclidean space and the sphere. Feature maps in these networks represent fields on a homogeneous base space, and layers are equivariant maps between spaces of fields. The theory enables a systematic classification of all existing G-CNNs in terms of their symmetry group, base space, and field type. We also consider a fundamental question: what is the most general kind of equivariant linear map between feature spaces (fields) of given types? Following Mackey, we show that such maps correspond one-to-one with convolutions using equivariant kernels, and characterize the space of such kernels.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Asymptotic learning curves of kernel methods: empirical data v.s. Teacher-Student paradigm

How many training data are needed to learn a supervised task? It is often observed that the generalization error decreases as $n^{-β}$ where $n$ is the number of training examples and $β$ an exponent that depends on both data and algorithm. In this work we measure $β$ when applying kernel methods to real datasets. For MNIST we find $β\approx 0.4$ and for CIFAR10 $β\approx 0.1$, for both regression and classification tasks, and for Gaussian or Laplace kernels. To rationalize the existence of non-trivial exponents that can be independent of the specific kernel used, we study the Teacher-Student framework for kernels. In this scheme, a Teacher generates data according to a Gaussian random field, and a Student learns them via kernel regression. With a simplifying assumption -- namely that the data are sampled from a regular lattice -- we derive analytically $β$ for translation invariant kernels, using previous results from the kriging literature. Provided that the Student is not too sensitive to high frequencies, $β$ depends only on the smoothness and dimension of the training data. We confirm numerically that these predictions hold when the training points are sampled at random on a hypersphere. Overall, the test error is found to be controlled by the magnitude of the projection of the true function on the kernel eigenvectors whose rank is larger than $n$. Using this idea we predict relate the exponent $β$ to an exponent $a$ describing how the coefficients of the true function in the eigenbasis of the kernel decay with rank. We extract $a$ from real data by performing kernel PCA, leading to $β\approx0.36$ for MNIST and $β\approx0.07$ for CIFAR10, in good agreement with observations. We argue that these rather large exponents are possible due to the small effective dimension of the data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Finding Symmetry Breaking Order Parameters with Euclidean Neural Networks

Curie's principle states that "when effects show certain asymmetry, this asymmetry must be found in the causes that gave rise to them". We demonstrate that symmetry equivariant neural networks uphold Curie's principle and can be used to articulate many symmetry-relevant scientific questions into simple optimization problems. We prove these properties mathematically and demonstrate them numerically by training a Euclidean symmetry equivariant neural network to learn symmetry-breaking input to deform a square into a rectangle and to generate octahedra tilting patterns in perovskites.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Perspective: A Phase Diagram for Deep Learning unifying Jamming, Feature Learning and Lazy Training

Deep learning algorithms are responsible for a technological revolution in a variety of tasks including image recognition or Go playing. Yet, why they work is not understood. Ultimately, they manage to classify data lying in high dimension -- a feat generically impossible due to the geometry of high dimensional space and the associated curse of dimensionality. Understanding what kind of structure, symmetry or invariance makes data such as images learnable is a fundamental challenge. Other puzzles include that (i) learning corresponds to minimizing a loss in high dimension, which is in general not convex and could well get stuck bad minima. (ii) Deep learning predicting power increases with the number of fitting parameters, even in a regime where data are perfectly fitted. In this manuscript, we review recent results elucidating (i,ii) and the perspective they offer on the (still unexplained) curse of dimensionality paradox. We base our theoretical discussion on the $(h,α)$ plane where $h$ is the network width and $α$ the scale of the output of the network at initialization, and provide new systematic measures of performance in that plane for MNIST and CIFAR 10. We argue that different learning regimes can be organized into a phase diagram. A line of critical points sharply delimits an under-parametrised phase from an over-parametrized one. In over-parametrized nets, learning can operate in two regimes separated by a smooth cross-over. At large initialization, it corresponds to a kernel method, whereas for small initializations features can be learnt, together with invariants in the data. We review the properties of these different phases, of the transition separating them and some open questions. Our treatment emphasizes analogies with physical systems, scaling arguments and the development of numerical observables to quantitatively test these results empirically.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

A jamming transition from under- to over-parametrization affects loss landscape and generalization

We argue that in fully-connected networks a phase transition delimits the over- and under-parametrized regimes where fitting can or cannot be achieved. Under some general conditions, we show that this transition is sharp for the hinge loss. In the whole over-parametrized regime, poor minima of the loss are not encountered during training since the number of constraints to satisfy is too small to hamper minimization. Our findings support a link between this transition and the generalization properties of the network: as we increase the number of parameters of a given model, starting from an under-parametrized network, we observe that the generalization error displays three phases: (i) initial decay, (ii) increase until the transition point --- where it displays a cusp --- and (iii) slow decay toward a constant for the rest of the over-parametrized regime. Thereby we identify the region where the classical phenomenon of over-fitting takes place, and the region where the model keeps improving, in line with previous empirical observations for modern neural networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Scaling description of generalization with number of parameters in deep learning

Supervised deep learning involves the training of neural networks with a large number $N$ of parameters. For large enough $N$, in the so-called over-parametrized regime, one can essentially fit the training data points. Sparsity-based arguments would suggest that the generalization error increases as $N$ grows past a certain threshold $N^{*}$. Instead, empirical studies have shown that in the over-parametrized regime, generalization error keeps decreasing with $N$. We resolve this paradox through a new framework. We rely on the so-called Neural Tangent Kernel, which connects large neural nets to kernel methods, to show that the initialization causes finite-size random fluctuations $\|f_{N}-\bar{f}_{N}\|\sim N^{-1/4}$ of the neural net output function $f_{N}$ around its expectation $\bar{f}_{N}$. These affect the generalization error $ε_{N}$ for classification: under natural assumptions, it decays to a plateau value $ε_{\infty}$ in a power-law fashion $\sim N^{-1/2}$. This description breaks down at a so-called jamming transition $N=N^{*}$. At this threshold, we argue that $\|f_{N}\|$ diverges. This result leads to a plausible explanation for the cusp in test error known to occur at $N^{*}$. Our results are confirmed by extensive empirical observations on the MNIST and CIFAR image datasets. Our analysis finally suggests that, given a computational envelope, the smallest generalization error is obtained using several networks of intermediate sizes, just beyond $N^{*}$, and averaging their outputs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access