Source author record

Mario Cetina

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
4topics
4close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2011arXiv

On (≤k)(\le k)-edges, crossings, and halving lines of geometric drawings of KnK_n

Let PP be a set of points in general position in the plane. Join all pairs of points in PP with straight line segments. The number of segment-crossings in such a drawing, denoted by $\crg(P)$, is the \emph{rectilinear crossing number} of PP. A \emph{halving line} of PP is a line passing though two points of PP that divides the rest of the points of PP in (almost) half. The number of halving lines of PP is denoted by h(P)h(P). Similarly, a kk\emph{-edge}, 0≤k≤n/2−10\leq k\leq n/2-1, is a line passing through two points of PP and leaving exactly kk points of PP on one side. The number of (≤k)(\le k)-edges of PP is denoted by E≤k(P)E_{\leq k}(P) . Let $\rcr(n)$, h(n)h(n), and E≤k(n)E_{\leq k}(n) denote the minimum of $\crg(P)$, the maximum of h(P)h(P), and the minimum of E≤k(P)E_{\leq k}(P) , respectively, over all sets PP of nn points in general position in the plane. We show that the previously best known lower bound on E≤k(n)E_{\leq k}(n) is tight for k<⌈(4n−2)/9⌉k<\lceil (4n-2) /9\rceil and improve it for all k≥⌈(4n−2)/9⌉k\geq \lceil (4n-2) /9 \rceil . This in turn improves the lower bound on $\rcr(n)$ from 0.37968(n4)+Θ(n3)0.37968\binom{n} {4}+Θ(n^{3}) to {277/729}\binom{n}{4}+Θ(n^{3})\geq 0.37997\binom{n}{4}+Θ(n^{3}).Wealsogivetheexactvaluesof. We also give the exact values of \rcr(n)and and h(n) forall for all n\leq27.Exactvalueswereknownonlyfor. Exact values were known only for n\leq18andodd and odd n\leq21forthecrossingnumber,andfor for the crossing number, and for n\leq14andodd and odd n\leq21$ for halving lines.

preprint2011arXiv

Visibility-preserving convexifications using single-vertex moves

Devadoss asked: (1) can every polygon be convexified so that no internal visibility (between vertices) is lost in the process? Moreover, (2) does such a convexification exist, in which exactly one vertex is moved at a time (that is, using {\em single-vertex moves})? We prove the redundancy of the "single-vertex moves" condition: an affirmative answer to (1) implies an affirmative answer to (2). Since Aichholzer et al. recently proved (1), this settles (2).

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.