Researcher profile

Marinella Sciortino

Marinella Sciortino contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Computing matching statistics on Wheeler DFAs

Matching statistics were introduced to solve the approximate string matching problem, which is a recurrent subroutine in bioinformatics applications. In 2010, Ohlebusch et al. [SPIRE 2010] proposed a time and space efficient algorithm for computing matching statistics which relies on some components of a compressed suffix tree - notably, the longest common prefix (LCP) array. In this paper, we show how their algorithm can be generalized from strings to Wheeler deterministic finite automata. Most importantly, we introduce a notion of LCP array for Wheeler automata, thus establishing a first clear step towards extending (compressed) suffix tree functionalities to labeled graphs.

preprint2022arXiv

Logarithmic equal-letter runs for BWT of purely morphic words

In this paper we study the number $r_{bwt}$ of equal-letter runs produced by the Burrows-Wheeler transform ($BWT$) when it is applied to purely morphic finite words, which are words generated by iterating prolongable morphisms. Such a parameter $r_{bwt}$ is very significant since it provides a measure of the performances of the $BWT$, in terms of both compressibility and indexing. In particular, we prove that, when $BWT$ is applied to any purely morphic finite word on a binary alphabet, $r_{bwt}$ is $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$, where $n$ is the length of the word. Moreover, we prove that $r_{bwt}$ is $Θ(\log n)$ for the binary words generated by a large class of prolongable binary morphisms. These bounds are proved by providing some new structural properties of the \emph{bispecial circular factors} of such words.

preprint2022arXiv

String Attractors and Infinite Words

The notion of string attractor has been introduced in [Kempa and Prezza, 2018] in the context of Data Compression and it represents a set of positions of a finite word in which all of its factors can be "attracted". The smallest size $γ^*$ of a string attractor for a finite word is a lower bound for several repetitiveness measures associated with the most common compression schemes, including BWT-based and LZ-based compressors. The combinatorial properties of the measure $γ^*$ have been studied in [Mantaci et al., 2021]. Very recently, a complexity measure, called string attractor profile function, has been introduced for infinite words, by evaluating $γ^*$ on each prefix. Such a measure has been studied for automatic sequences and linearly recurrent infinite words [Schaeffer and Shallit, 2021]. In this paper, we study the relationship between such a complexity measure and other well-known combinatorial notions related to repetitiveness in the context of infinite words, such as the factor complexity and the recurrence. Furthermore, we introduce new string attractor-based complexity measures, in which the structure and the distribution of positions in a string attractor of the prefixes of infinite words are considered. We show that such measures provide a finer classification of some infinite families of words.

preprint2022arXiv

Teaching the Burrows-Wheeler Transform via the Positional Burrows-Wheeler Transform

The Burrows-Wheeler Transform (BWT) is often taught in undergraduate courses on algorithmic bioinformatics, because it underlies the FM-index and thus important tools such as Bowtie and BWA. Its admirers consider the BWT a thing of beauty but, despite thousands of pages being written about it over nearly thirty years, to undergraduates seeing it for the first time it still often seems like magic. Some who persevere are later shown the Positional BWT (PBWT), which was published twenty years after the BWT. In this paper we argue that the PBWT should be taught {\em before} the BWT. We first use the PBWT's close relation to a right-to-left radix sort to explain how to use it as a fast and space-efficient index for {\em positional search} on a set of strings (that is, given a pattern and a position, quickly list the strings containing that pattern starting in that position). We then observe that {\em prefix search} (listing all the strings that start with the pattern) is an easy special case of positional search, and that prefix search on the suffixes of a single string is equivalent to {\em substring search} in that string (listing all the starting positions of occurrences of the pattern in the string). Storing naïvely a PBWT of the suffixes of a string is space-{\em inefficient} but, in even reasonably small examples, most of its columns are nearly the same. It is not difficult to show that if we store a PBWT of the cyclic shifts of the string, instead of its suffixes, then all the columns are exactly the same -- and equal to the BWT of the string. Thus we can teach the BWT and the FM-index via the PBWT.

preprint2019arXiv

Inducing the Lyndon Array

In this paper we propose a variant of the induced suffix sorting algorithm by Nong (TOIS, 2013) that computes simultaneously the Lyndon array and the suffix array of a text in $O(n)$ time using $σ+ O(1)$ words of working space, where $n$ is the length of the text and $σ$ is the alphabet size. Our result improves the previous best space requirement for linear time computation of the Lyndon array. In fact, all the known linear algorithms for Lyndon array computation use suffix sorting as a preprocessing step and use $O(n)$ words of working space in addition to the Lyndon array and suffix array. Experimental results with real and synthetic datasets show that our algorithm is not only space-efficient but also fast in practice.