A note on one-sided recognizable morphisms
We revisit the notion of one-sided recognizability of morphisms and its relation to two-sided recognizability.
Researcher profile
Antonio Restivo
Antonio Restivo contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Trust snapshot
Quick read
Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators
Actions
Decide how to stay connected
Identity and collaboration
How to connect with this researcher
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Open a focused conversation when the fit is right
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
See the researcher in context
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
Building this graph slice
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
5 published item(s)
preprint2022arXiv
Reducing the local alphabet size in tiling systems by means of 2D comma-free codes
A recognizable picture language is defined as the projection of a local picture language defined by a set of two-by-two tiles, i.e. by a strictly-locally-testable (SLT) language of order 2. The family of recognizable picture languages is also defined, using larger $k$ by $k$ tiles, $k>2$, by the projection of the corresponding SLT language. A basic measure of the descriptive complexity of a picture language is given by the size of the SLT alphabet using two-by-two tiles, more precisely by the so-called alphabetic ratio of sizes: SLT-alphabet / picture-alphabet. We study how the alphabetic ratio changes moving from tiles of size two to tiles of larger size, and we obtain the following result: any recognizable picture language over an alphabet of size $n$ is the projection of an SLT language over an alphabet of size $2n$. Moreover, two is the minimal alphabetic ratio possible in general. The proof relies on a new family of comma-free picture codes, for which a lower bound on numerosity is established; and on the relation of languages of encoded pictures with SLT languages. Our result reproduces in two dimensions a similar property (known as Extended Medvedev's theorem) of the regular word languages, concerning the minimal alphabetic ratio needed to define a language by means of a projection of an SLT word language.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv
String Attractors and Infinite Words
The notion of string attractor has been introduced in [Kempa and Prezza, 2018] in the context of Data Compression and it represents a set of positions of a finite word in which all of its factors can be "attracted". The smallest size $γ^*$ of a string attractor for a finite word is a lower bound for several repetitiveness measures associated with the most common compression schemes, including BWT-based and LZ-based compressors. The combinatorial properties of the measure $γ^*$ have been studied in [Mantaci et al., 2021]. Very recently, a complexity measure, called string attractor profile function, has been introduced for infinite words, by evaluating $γ^*$ on each prefix. Such a measure has been studied for automatic sequences and linearly recurrent infinite words [Schaeffer and Shallit, 2021]. In this paper, we study the relationship between such a complexity measure and other well-known combinatorial notions related to repetitiveness in the context of infinite words, such as the factor complexity and the recurrence. Furthermore, we introduce new string attractor-based complexity measures, in which the structure and the distribution of positions in a string attractor of the prefixes of infinite words are considered. We show that such measures provide a finer classification of some infinite families of words.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv
Unambiguously coded shifts
We study the coded systems introduced by Blanchard and Hansel. We give several constructions which allow one to represent a coded system as a strongly unambiguous one.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv
Primitive Sets of Words
Given a (finite or infinite) subset $X$ of the free monoid $A^*$ over a finite alphabet $A$, the rank of $X$ is the minimal cardinality of a set $F$ such that $X \subseteq F^*$. We say that a submonoid $M$ generated by $k$ elements of $A^*$ is {\em $k$-maximal} if there does not exist another submonoid generated by at most $k$ words containing $M$. We call a set $X \subseteq A^*$ {\em primitive} if it is the basis of a $|X|$-maximal submonoid. This definition encompasses the notion of primitive word -- in fact, $\{w\}$ is a primitive set if and only if $w$ is a primitive word. By definition, for any set $X$, there exists a primitive set $Y$ such that $X \subseteq Y^*$. We therefore call $Y$ a {\em primitive root} of $X$. As a main result, we prove that if a set has rank $2$, then it has a unique primitive root. To obtain this result, we prove that the intersection of two $2$-maximal submonoids is either the empty word or a submonoid generated by one single primitive word. For a single word $w$, we say that the set $\{x,y\}$ is a {\em bi-root} of $w$ if $w$ can be written as a concatenation of copies of $x$ and $y$ and $\{x,y\}$ is a primitive set. We prove that every primitive word $w$ has at most one bi-root $\{x,y\}$ such that $|x|+|y|<\sqrt{|w|}$. That is, the bi-root of a word is unique provided the word is sufficiently long with respect to the size (sum of lengths) of the root. Our results are also compared to previous approaches that investigate pseudo-repetitions, where a morphic involutive function $θ$ is defined on $A^*$. In this setting, the notions of $θ$-power, $θ$-primitive and $θ$-root are defined, and it is shown that any word has a unique $θ$-primitive root. This result can be obtained with our approach by showing that a word $w$ is $θ$-primitive if and only if $\{w, θ(w)\}$ is a primitive set.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access