Researcher profile

Mariia Seleznova

Mariia Seleznova contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - Baseline
3works
0followers
2topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

How Long Does Infinite Width Last? Signal Propagation in Long-Range Linear Recurrences

We study signal propagation in linear recurrent models at finite width. While existing signal propagation theory relies predominantly on the infinite-width limit, it remains unclear for how long that approximation remains accurate when recurrent depth $t$ grows jointly with width $n$. This question is especially relevant for modern recurrent sequence models, whose natural operating regime involves long input sequences, i.e., large $t$. We derive exact finite-width formulas for the hidden state signal energies in linear recurrences under complex Gaussian initialization. Using these formulas, we identify the joint depth-width scaling regimes that govern signal propagation: (i) a subcritical regime $t=o(\sqrt n)$, in which the infinite-width approximation remains valid; (ii) a critical regime $t\sim c\sqrt n$, in which non-negligible deviations from infinite-width predictions appear and a nontrivial joint scaling limit emerges; and (iii) a supercritical regime $t\gg \sqrt n$, in which finite-width effects dominate. Thus, our results pinpoint the precise recurrent depth scale at which infinite-width theory breaks down in long-range linear recurrences. In turn, this shows when standard initialization schemes, such as Glorot, become unstable. More broadly, our results demonstrate that finite-width effects accumulate more rapidly with depth in recurrent models than in feedforward ones, leading to qualitatively different signal propagation behavior.

preprint2022arXiv

Analyzing Finite Neural Networks: Can We Trust Neural Tangent Kernel Theory?

Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) theory is widely used to study the dynamics of infinitely-wide deep neural networks (DNNs) under gradient descent. But do the results for infinitely-wide networks give us hints about the behavior of real finite-width ones? In this paper, we study empirically when NTK theory is valid in practice for fully-connected ReLU and sigmoid DNNs. We find out that whether a network is in the NTK regime depends on the hyperparameters of random initialization and the network's depth. In particular, NTK theory does not explain the behavior of sufficiently deep networks initialized so that their gradients explode as they propagate through the network's layers: the kernel is random at initialization and changes significantly during training in this case, contrary to NTK theory. On the other hand, in the case of vanishing gradients, DNNs are in the the NTK regime but become untrainable rapidly with depth. We also describe a framework to study generalization properties of DNNs, in particular the variance of network's output function, by means of NTK theory and discuss its limits.

preprint2022arXiv

Neural Tangent Kernel Beyond the Infinite-Width Limit: Effects of Depth and Initialization

Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) is widely used to analyze overparametrized neural networks due to the famous result by Jacot et al. (2018): in the infinite-width limit, the NTK is deterministic and constant during training. However, this result cannot explain the behavior of deep networks, since it generally does not hold if depth and width tend to infinity simultaneously. In this paper, we study the NTK of fully-connected ReLU networks with depth comparable to width. We prove that the NTK properties depend significantly on the depth-to-width ratio and the distribution of parameters at initialization. In fact, our results indicate the importance of the three phases in the hyperparameter space identified in Poole et al. (2016): ordered, chaotic and the edge of chaos (EOC). We derive exact expressions for the NTK dispersion in the infinite-depth-and-width limit in all three phases and conclude that the NTK variability grows exponentially with depth at the EOC and in the chaotic phase but not in the ordered phase. We also show that the NTK of deep networks may stay constant during training only in the ordered phase and discuss how the structure of the NTK matrix changes during training.