BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Marcus Kaiser

Marcus Kaiser contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Neurons and CognitionQuantitative MethodsComputational Engineering, Finance, and ScienceComputer Science and Game TheoryData Structures and AlgorithmsDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computingmath.DSMultiagent Systems

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

BioDynaMo: a general platform for scalable agent-based simulation

Motivation: Agent-based modeling is an indispensable tool for studying complex biological systems. However, existing simulators do not always take full advantage of modern hardware and often have a field-specific software design. Results: We present a novel simulation platform called BioDynaMo that alleviates both of these problems. BioDynaMo features a general-purpose and high-performance simulation engine. We demonstrate that BioDynaMo can be used to simulate use cases in: neuroscience, oncology, and epidemiology. For each use case we validate our findings with experimental data or an analytical solution. Our performance results show that BioDynaMo performs up to three orders of magnitude faster than the state-of-the-art baseline. This improvement makes it feasible to simulate each use case with one billion agents on a single server, showcasing the potential BioDynaMo has for computational biology research. Availability: BioDynaMo is an open-source project under the Apache 2.0 license and is available at www.biodynamo.org. Instructions to reproduce the results are available in supplementary information. Contact: lukas.breitwieser@inf.ethz.ch, a.s.hesam@tudelft.nl, omutlu@ethz.ch, r.bauer@surrey.ac.uk Supplementary information: Available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4501515

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Computation of Dynamic Equilibria in Series-Parallel Networks

We consider dynamic equilibria for flows over time under the fluid queuing model. In this model, queues on the links of a network take care of flow propagation. Flow enters the network at a single source and leaves at a single sink. In a dynamic equilibrium, every infinitesimally small flow particle reaches the sink as early as possible given the pattern of the rest of the flow. While this model has been examined for many decades, progress has been relatively recent. In particular, the derivatives of dynamic equilibria have been characterized as thin flows with resetting, which allowed for more structural results. Our two main results are based on the formulation of thin flows with resetting as linear complementarity problem and its analysis. We present a constructive proof of existence for dynamic equilibria if the inflow rate is right-monotone. The complexity of computing thin flows with resetting, which occurs as a subproblem in this method, is still open. We settle it for the class of two-terminal series-parallel networks by giving a recursive algorithm that solves the problem for all flow values simultaneously in polynomial time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Functional compensation after lesions: Predicting site and extent of recovery

In some cases, the function of a lesioned area can be compensated for by another area. However, it remains unpredictable if and by which other area a lesion can be compensated. We assume that similar incoming and outgoing connections are necessary to encode the same function as the damaged region. The similarity can be measured both locally using the matching index and looking at a more global scale by non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). We tested how well both measures can predict the compensating area for the loss of the visual cortex in kittens. For this case study, the global comparison of connectivity turns out to be a better method for predicting functional compensation. In future studies, the extent of the similarity between the lesioned and compensating regions might be a measure of the extent to which function can be successfully recovered.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Predicting the Impact of Electric Field Stimulation in a Detailed Computational Model of Cortical Tissue

Neurostimulation using weak electric fields has generated excitement in recent years due to its potential as a medical intervention. However, study of this stimulation modality has been hampered by inconsistent results and large variability within and between studies. In order to begin addressing this variability we need to properly characterise the impact of the current on the underlying neuron populations. To develop and test a computational model capable of capturing the impact of electric field stimulation on networks of neurons. We construct a cortical tissue model with distinct layers and explicit neuron morphologies. We then apply a model of electrical stimulation and carry out multiple test case simulations. The cortical slice model is compared to experimental literature and shown to capture the main features of the electrophysiological response to stimulation. Namely, the model showed 1) a similar level of depolarisation in individual pyramidal neurons, 2) acceleration of intrinsic oscillations, and 3) retention of the spatial profile of oscillations in different layers. We then apply alternative electric fields to demonstrate how the model can capture differences in neuronal responses to the electric field. We demonstrate that the tissue response is dependent on layer depth, the angle of the apical dendrite relative to the field, and stimulation strength. We present publicly available computational modelling software that predicts the neuron network population response to electric field stimulation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Reliability and comparability of human brain structural covariance networks

Structural covariance analysis is a widely used structural MRI analysis method which characterises the co-relations of morphology between brain regions over a group of subjects. To our knowledge, little has been investigated in terms of the comparability of results between different data sets or the reliability of results over the same subjects in different rescan sessions, image resolutions, or FreeSurfer versions. In terms of comparability, our results show substantial differences in the structural covariance matrix between data sets of age- and sex-matched healthy human adults. These differences persist after site correction, they are exacerbated by low sample sizes, and they are most pronounced when using average cortical thickness as a morphological measure. Down-stream graph theoretic analyses further show statistically significant differences. In terms of reliability, substantial differences were also found when comparing repeated scan sessions of the same subjects, and image resolutions and FreeSurfer versions of the same image. We could further estimate the relative measurement error and showed that it is largest when using thickness. With simulated data, we argue that cortical thickness is least reliable because of larger relative measurement errors. Practically, we make the following recommendations (1) pooling subjects across sites into one group should be avoided, particularly if sites differ in image resolutions, demographics, or preprocessing; (2) surface area and volume should be preferred as morphological measures over cortical thickness; (3) a large number of subjects should be used to estimate structural covariance; (4) measurement error should be assessed where repeated measurements are available; (5) if combining sites is critical, univariate site-correction is insufficient, but error covariance should be explicitly measured and modelled.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access