Source author record

Marco Mustafa Mohammed

Marco Mustafa Mohammed appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

GEM-FI: Gated Evidential Mixtures with Fisher Modulation

Evidential Deep Learning (EDL) enables single-pass uncertainty estimation by predicting Dirichlet evidence, but it can remain overconfident and poorly calibrated, and it often fails to represent multi-modal epistemic uncertainty. We introduce Gated Evidential Mixtures (GEM), a family of models that learns an in-model energy signal and uses it to gate evidential outputs end-to-end in a distance-informed manner. GEM-CORE learns a feature-level energy and maps it to a bounded gate that smoothly suppresses evidence when support is low. To capture epistemic multi-modality without multi-pass ensembling, GEM-MIX adds a lightweight mixture of evidential heads with learned routing weights while preserving single-pass inference. Finally, GEM-FI stabilizes mixture allocations via a Fisher-informed regularizer, reducing head collapse and producing smoother boundary uncertainty. Across image classification and OOD detection benchmarks, GEM improves calibration and ID/OOD separation with single-pass inference. On CIFAR-10, GEM-FI vs. DAEDL improves accuracy from 91.11 to 93.75 (+2.64 pp), reduces Brier x100 from 14.27 to 6.81 (-7.46), and also improves misclassification-detection AUPR from 99.08 to 99.94 (+0.86). For epistemic OOD detection, GEM-FI achieves AUPR/AUROC of 92.59/95.09 on CIFAR-10 to SVHN and 90.20/89.06 on CIFAR-10 to CIFAR-100, compared with 85.54/89.30 and 88.19/86.10 for DAEDL.