Source author record

Marco Mughetti

Marco Mughetti appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

An interpolation problem in the Denjoy-Carleman classes

Inspired by some iterative algorithms useful for proving the real analyticity (or the Gevrey regularity) of a solution of a linear partial differential equation with real-analytic coefficients, we consider the following question. Given a smooth function defined on $[a,b]\subset\mathbb{R}$ and given an increasing divergent sequence $d_n$ of positive integers such that the derivative of order $d_n$ of $f$ has a growth of the type $M_{d_n}$, when can we deduce that $f$ is a function in the Denjoy-Carleman class $C^M([a,b])$? We provide a positive result, and we show that a suitable condition on the gaps between the terms of the sequence $d_n$ is needed.

preprint2016arXiv

Analytic Hypoellipticity for Sums of Squares and the Treves Conjecture

We are concerned with the problem of real analytic regularity of the solutions of sums of squares with real analytic coefficients. Treves conjecture states that an operator of this type is analytic hypoelliptic if and only if all the strata in the Poisson-Treves stratification are symplectic. We produce a model operator, $ P_{1} $, having a single symplectic stratum and prove that it is Gevrey $ s_{0} $ hypoelliptic and not better. See Theorem \ref{th:1} for a definition of $ s_{0} $. We also show that this phenomenon has a microlocal character. We point out explicitly that this is a counterexample to the sufficient part of Treves conjecture and not to the necessary part, which is still an open problem.