BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Marco Broccardo

Marco Broccardo contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
ApplicationsMachine Learningphysics.geo-phMethodologyNeural and Evolutionary Computingphysics.soc-phPopulations and EvolutionQuantitative Methods

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

Recorded Versus Synthetic Spectral-compatible Ground Motions: A Comparative Analysis of Structural Seismic Responses

This paper presents a comparative analysis of structural seismic responses under two types of ground motion inputs: (i) synthetic motions generated by stochastic spectral-compatible ground motion models and (ii) recorded motions from an earthquake database. Both ground motion datasets are calibrated to a shared target response spectrum to ensure consistent spectral median, variance, and correlation structure. Five key stochastic response metrics-probability distributions, statistical moments, correlations, tail indices, and variance-based global sensitivity indices-are systematically evaluated for two representative structures: a medium-period building and a limiting case of a long-period tower. The comparison accounts for uncertainties both from ground motion and structural parameters. The results reveal that synthetic motions closely replicate recorded motions in terms of global response behavior-including distributions, mean and variance, correlation structure, and dominant uncertainty sources-indicating their suitability for routine seismic design and parametric studies. However, substantial differences emerge in response extremes for long-period structures, particularly in metrics governed by rare events, such as higher-order moments and tail behavior. These differences, which often exceed 50%, can be attributed to the non-Gaussian features and complex characteristics inherent in recorded motions, which are less pronounced in synthetic datasets. The findings support the use of synthetic ground motions for evaluating global seismic response characteristics, while highlighting their limitations in capturing rare-event behavior and long-period structural dynamics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2024arXiv

The Importance of Corner Frequency in Site-Based Stochastic Ground Motion Models

Synthetic ground motions (GMs) play a fundamental role in both deterministic and probabilistic seismic engineering assessments. This paper shows that the family of filtered and modulated white noise stochastic GM models overlooks a key parameter -- the high-pass filter's corner frequency, $f_c$. In the simulated motions, this causes significant distortions in the long-period range of the linear-response spectra and in the linear-response spectral correlations. To address this, we incorporate $f_c$ as an explicitly fitted parameter in a site-based stochastic model. We optimize $f_c$ by individually matching the long-period linear-response spectrum (i.e., $Sa(T)$ for $T \geq 1$s) of synthetic GMs with that of each recorded GM. We show that by fitting $f_c$ the resulting stochastically simulated GMs can precisely capture the spectral amplitudes, variability (i.e., variances of $\log(Sa(T))$), and the correlation structure (i.e., correlation of $\log(Sa(T))$ between distinct periods $T_1$ and $T_2$) of recorded GMs. To quantify the impact of $f_c$, a sensitivity analysis is conducted through linear regression. This regression relates the logarithmic linear-response spectrum ($\log(Sa(T))$) to seven GM parameters, including the optimized $f_c$. The results indicate that the variance of $f_c$ observed in natural GMs, along with its correlation with the other GM parameters, accounts for 26\% of the spectral variability in long periods. Neglecting either the $f_c$ variance or $f_c$ correlation typically results in an important overestimation of the linear-response spectral correlation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Probabilistic Performance-Pattern Decomposition (PPPD): analysis framework and applications to stochastic mechanical systems

Since the early 1900s, numerous research efforts have been devoted to developing quantitative solutions to stochastic mechanical systems. In general, the problem is perceived as solved when a complete or partial probabilistic description on the quantity of interest (QoI) is determined. However, in the presence of complex system behavior, there is a critical need to go beyond mere probabilistic descriptions. In fact, to gain a full understanding of the system, it is crucial to extract physical characterizations from the probabilistic structure of the QoI, especially when the QoI solution is obtained in a data-driven fashion. Motivated by this perspective, the paper proposes a framework to obtain structuralized characterizations on behaviors of stochastic systems. The framework is named Probabilistic Performance-Pattern Decomposition (PPPD). PPPD analysis aims to decompose complex response behaviors, conditional to a prescribed performance state, into meaningful patterns in the space of system responses, and to investigate how the patterns are triggered in the space of basic random variables. To illustrate the application of PPPD, the paper studies three numerical examples: 1) an illustrative example with hypothetical stochastic processes input and output; 2) a stochastic Lorenz system with periodic as well as chaotic behaviors; and 3) a simplified shear-building model subjected to a stochastic ground motion excitation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The dynamics of entropy in the COVID-19 outbreaks

With the unfolding of the COVID-19 pandemic, mathematical modeling of epidemics has been perceived and used as a central element in understanding, predicting, and governing the pandemic event. However, soon it became clear that long term predictions were extremely challenging to address. Moreover, it is still unclear which metric shall be used for a global description of the evolution of the outbreaks. Yet a robust modeling of pandemic dynamics and a consistent choice of the transmission metric is crucial for an in-depth understanding of the macroscopic phenomenology and better-informed mitigation strategies. In this study, we propose a Markovian stochastic framework designed to describe the evolution of entropy during the COVID-19 pandemic and the instantaneous reproductive ratio. We then introduce and use entropy-based metrics of global transmission to measure the impact and temporal evolution of a pandemic event. In the formulation of the model, the temporal evolution of the outbreak is modeled by the master equation of a nonlinear Markov process for a statistically averaged individual, leading to a clear physical interpretation. We also provide a full Bayesian inversion scheme for calibration. The time evolution of the entropy rate, the absolute change in the system entropy, and the instantaneous reproductive ratio are natural and transparent outputs of this framework. The framework has the appealing property of being applicable to any compartmental epidemic model. As an illustration, we apply the proposed approach to a simple modification of the Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Removed (SEIR) model. Applying the model to the Hubei region, South Korean, Italian, Spanish, German, and French COVID-19 data-sets, we discover a significant difference in the absolute change of entropy but highly regular trends for both the entropy evolution and the instantaneous reproductive ratio.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Neural Network Applications in Earthquake Prediction (1994-2019): Meta-Analytic Insight on their Limitations

In the last few years, deep learning has solved seemingly intractable problems, boosting the hope to find approximate solutions to problems that now are considered unsolvable. Earthquake prediction, the Grail of Seismology, is, in this context of continuous exciting discoveries, an obvious choice for deep learning exploration. We review the entire literature of artificial neural network (ANN) applications for earthquake prediction (77 articles, 1994-2019 period) and find two emerging trends: an increasing interest in this domain, and a complexification of ANN models over time, towards deep learning. Despite apparent positive results observed in this corpus, we demonstrate that simpler models seem to offer similar predictive powers, if not better ones. Due to the structured, tabulated nature of earthquake catalogues, and the limited number of features so far considered, simpler and more transparent machine learning models seem preferable at the present stage of research. Those baseline models follow first physical principles and are consistent with the known empirical laws of Statistical Seismology, which have minimal abilities to predict large earthquakes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access