BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Manuele Santoprete

Manuele Santoprete contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math-phmath.DSmath.MPphysics.soc-phmath.CAPopulations and Evolution

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
6topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

Countering Violent Extremism: A mathematical model

The term radicalization refers to the process of developing extremist religious political or social beliefs and ideologies. Radicalization becomes a threat to national security when it leads to violence. Prevention and de-radicalization initiatives are part of a set of strategies used to combat violent extremism, which taken together are known as Countering Violent Extremism (CVE). Prevention programs aim to stop the radicalization process before it starts. De-radicalization programs attempt to reform convicted extremists with the ultimate goal of social reintegration. We describe prevention and de-radicalization programs mathematically using a compartmental model. The prevention initiatives are modeled by including a vaccination compartment, while the de-radicalization process is modeled by including a treatment compartment. The model exhibits a threshold dynamics characterized by the basic reproduction number $ R _0 $. When $ R _0< 1 $ the system has a unique equilibrium that is asymptotically stable. When $ R _0 >1 $ the system has another equilibrium called &#34;endemic equilibrium&#34;, which is globally asymptotically stable. These results are established by using Lyapunov functions and LaSalle&#39;s invariance principle. We perform numerical simulations to confirm our theoretical results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

Global stability in a mathematical model of de-radicalization

Radicalization is the process by which people come to adopt increasingly extreme political, social or religious ideologies. When radicalization leads to violence, radical thinking becomes a threat to national security. De-radicalization programs are part of an effort to combat violent extremism and terrorism. This type of initiatives attempt to alter violent extremists radical beliefs and violent behavior with the aim to reintegrate them into society. In this paper we introduce a simple compartmental model suitable to describe de-radicalization programs. The population is divided into four compartments: $ (S) $ susceptible, $ (E) $ extremists, $ (R) $ recruiters, and $ (T) $ treatment. We calculate the basic reproduction number $ \mathcal{R}_0 $. For $ \mathcal{R}_0< 1 $ the system has one globally asymptotically stable equilibrium where no extremist or recruiters are present. For $ \mathcal{R}_0 >1 $ the system has an additional equilibrium where extremists and recruiters are endemic to the population. A Lyapunov function is used to show that, for $ \mathcal{R}_0 >1 $, the endemic equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable. We use numerical simulations to support our analytical results. Based on our model we asses strategies to counter violent extremism.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2017arXiv

A bare-bones mathematical model of radicalization

Radicalization is the process by which people come to adopt increasingly extreme political or religious ideologies. While radical thinking is by no means problematic in itself, it becomes a threat to national security when it leads to violence. We introduce a simple compartmental model (similar to epidemiology models) to describe the radicalization process. We then extend the model to allow for multiple ideologies. Our approach is similar to the one used in the study of multi-strain diseases. Based on our models, we assess several strategies to counter violent extremism.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2017arXiv

Four-body central configurations with one pair of opposite sides parallel

We study four-body central configurations with one pair of opposite sides parallel. We use a novel constraint to write the central configuration equations in this special case, using distances as variables. We prove that, for a given ordering of the mutual distances, a trapezoidal central configuration must have a certain partial ordering of the masses. We also show that if opposite masses of a four-body trapezoidal central configuration are equal, then the configuration has a line of symmetry and it must be a kite. In contrast to the general four-body case, we show that if the two adjacent masses bounding the shortest side are equal, then the configuration must be an isosceles trapezoid, and the remaining two masses must also be equal.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2017arXiv

Planarity conditions and four-body central configurations equations with angles as coordinates

We discuss several conditions for four points to lie on a plane, and we use them to find new equations for four-body central configurations that use angles as variables. We use these equations to give novel proofs of some results for four-body central configuration. We also give a clear geometrical explanation of why Ptolemy&#39;s theorem can be used to write equations for co-circular central configurations when mutual distances are used as coordinates.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access