Source author record

Manoj K. Yadav

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

20works
4topics
4close collaborators

Published work

20 publications

preprint2023arXiv

Symmetric skew braces and brace systems

For a skew left brace (G,⋅,∘)(G, \cdot, \circ), the map $λ: (G, \circ) \to \Aut \,(G, \cdot),~~a \mapsto λ_a,$ where λa(b)=a−1⋅(a∘b)λ_a(b) = a^{-1} \cdot (a \circ b) for all a,b∈Ga, b \in G, is a group homomorphism. Then λλ can also be viewed as a map from (G,⋅)(G, \cdot) to $\Aut \, (G, \cdot)$, which, in general, may not be a homomorphism. A skew left brace will be called λλ-anti-homomorphic (λλ-homomorphic) if $λ: (G, \cdot) \to \Aut \, (G, \cdot)$ is an anti-homomorphism (a homomorphism). We mainly study such skew left braces. We device a method for constructing a class of binary operations on a given set so that the set with any two such operations constitute a λλ-homomorphic symmetric skew brace. Most of the constructions of symmetric skew braces dealt with in the literature fall in the framework of our construction. We then carry out various such constructions on specific infinite sets.

preprint2020arXiv

Converse of Schur's Theorem - A statement

Let GG be an arbitrary group such that G/Z(G)G/\Z(G) is finite, where Z(G)\Z(G) denotes the center of the group GG. Then γ2(G)γ_2(G), the commutator subgroup of GG, is finite. This result is known as Shur's theorem (the Schur's theorem). In this short note we provide a quick survey on the converse of Schur's theorem, generalize known results in this direction and prove the following result (which is perhaps the most suitable statement for converse of the Schur's theorem): If GG is an arbitrary group with finite γ2(G)γ_2(G), then G/Z(G)G/\Z(G) is finite if Z2(G)/Z(Z2(G))\Z_2(G)/\Z(\Z_2(G)) is finitely generated, where Z2(G)\Z_2(G) denotes the second center of a group GG. If G/Z(G)G/\Z(G) is finite, then γ2(G)γ_2(G) is also finite and ∣G/Z(G)∣≤∣γ2(G)∣d|G/\Z(G)| \le |γ_2(G)|^d, where dd denotes the number of elements in any minimal generating ser for G/Z(G)G/\Z(G). We classify all nilpotent groups GG of class 2 upto isoclinism (in the sense of P. Hall) such that ∣G/Z(G)∣=∣γ2(G)∣d|G/\Z(G)| = |γ_2(G)|^d, and ask some questions in the sequel.

preprint2020arXiv

Modeling Control, Lockdown \& Exit Strategies for COVID-19 Pandemic in India

COVID-19--a viral infectious disease--has quickly emerged as a global pandemic infecting millions of people with a significant number of deaths across the globe. The symptoms of this disease vary widely. Depending on the symptoms an infected person is broadly classified into two categories namely, asymptomatic and symptomatic. Asymptomatic individuals display mild or no symptoms but continue to transmit the infection to otherwise healthy individuals. This particular aspect of asymptomatic infection poses a major obstacle in managing and controlling the transmission of the infectious disease. In this paper, we attempt to mathematically model the spread of COVID-19 in India under various intervention strategies. We consider SEIR type epidemiological models, incorporated with India specific social contact matrix representing contact structures among different age groups of the population. Impact of various factors such as presence of asymptotic individuals, lockdown strategies, social distancing practices, quarantine, and hospitalization on the disease transmission is extensively studied. Numerical simulation of our model is matched with the real COVID-19 data of India till May 15, 2020 for the purpose of estimating the model parameters. Our model with zone-wise lockdown is seen to give a decent prediction for July 20, 2020.

preprint2020arXiv

On λλ-homomorphic skew braces

For a skew left brace (G,⋅,∘)(G, \cdot, \circ), the map λ:(G,∘)→Aut  (G,⋅),  a↦λaλ: (G, \circ) \to \mathrm{Aut} \;(G, \cdot),~~a \mapsto λ_a, where λa(b)=a−1⋅(a∘b)λ_a(b) = a^{-1} \cdot (a \circ b) for all a,b∈Ga, b \in G, is a group homomorphism. Then λλ can also be viewed as a map from (G,⋅)(G, \cdot) to Aut  (G,⋅)\mathrm{Aut}\; (G, \cdot), which, in general, may not be a homomorphism. We study skew left braces (G,⋅,∘)(G, \cdot, \circ) for which λ:(G,⋅)→Aut  (G,⋅)λ: (G, \cdot) \to \mathrm{Aut}\; (G, \cdot) is a homomorphism. Such skew left braces will be called λλ-homomorphic. We formulate necessary and sufficient conditions under which a given homomorphism λ:(G,⋅)→Aut  (G,⋅)λ: (G, \cdot) \to \mathrm{Aut}\; (G, \cdot) gives rise to a skew left brace, which, indeed, is λλ-homomorphic. As an application, we construct skew left braces when (G,⋅)(G, \cdot) is either a free group or a free abelian group. We prove that any λλ-homomorphic skew left brace is an extension of a trivial skew brace by a trivial skew brace. Special emphasis is given on λλ-homomorphic skew left brace for which the image of λλ is cyclic. A complete characterization of such skew left braces on the free abelian group of rank two is obtained.

preprint2016arXiv

Note on Caranti's Method of Construction of Miller groups

The non-abelian groups with abelian group of automorphisms are widely studied. Following Earnley, such groups are called Miller groups, since the first example of such a group was given by Miller in 1913. Many other examples of Miller pp-groups have been constructed by several authors. Recently, A. Caranti [{\it Israel J. Mathematics {\bf 205} (2015), 235-246}] provided module theoretic methods for constructing non-special Miller pp-groups from special Miller pp-groups. By constructing examples, we show that these methods do not always work. We also provide a sufficient condition on special Miller pp-group for which the methods of Caranti work.

preprint2012arXiv

Class preserving automorphisms of unitriangular groups

Let UTn(K)\textrm{UT}_n (K) be a unitriangular group over a field KK and Γn,k:=UTn(K)/γk(UTn(K))Γ_{n,k} := \textrm{UT}_n (K)/ γ_k(\textrm{UT}_n (K)), where γk(UTn(K))γ_k (\mathrm{UT}_n(K)) denotes the kk-th term of the lower central series of UTn(K)\mathrm{UT}_n (K), 2≤k≤n2 \le k \le n. We prove that the group of all class preserving automorphisms of Γn,kΓ_{n,k} is equal to $\Inn(Γ_{n,k})$ if and only if KK is a prime field. Let Gn(m):=UTn(Fpm)/γ3(UTn(Fpm))G_n^{(m)} := \mathrm{UT}_n (\mathbb{F}_{p^m}) / γ_3 (\mathrm{UT}_n(\mathbb{F}_{p^m})). We calculate the group of all class preserving automorphisms and class preserving outer automorphisms of Gn(m)G_n^{(m)}.

preprint2011arXiv

On Automorphisms of Some Finite pp-groups

We give a sufficient condition on a finite pp-group GG of nilpotency class 2 so that $\Aut_c(G) = \Inn(G)$, where $\Aut_c(G)$ and $\Inn(G)$ denote the group of all class preserving automorphisms and inner automorphisms of GG respectively. Next we prove that if GG and HH are two isoclinic finite groups (in the sense of P. Hall), then $\Aut_c(G) \cong \Aut_c(H)$. Finally we study class preserving automorphisms of groups of order p5p^5 and prove that $\Aut_c(G) = \Inn(G)$ for all the groups of order p5p^5 except two isoclinism families.

preprint2011arXiv

On finite pp-groups whose automorphisms are all central

An automorphism αα of a group GG is said to be central if αα commutes with every inner automorphism of GG. We construct a family of non-special finite pp-groups having abelian automorphism groups. These groups provide counter examples to a conjecture of A. Mahalanobis [Israel J. Math., {\bf 165} (2008), 161 - 187]. We also construct a family of finite pp-groups having non-abelian automorphism groups and all automorphisms central. This solves a problem of I. Malinowska [Advances in group theory, Aracne Editrice, Rome 2002, 111-127].

preprint2011arXiv

On subgroups generated by small classes in finite groups

Let GG be a finite group and M(G)M(G) be the subgroup of GG generated by all non-central elements of GG that lie in the conjugacy classes of the smallest size. Recently several results have been proved regarding the nilpotency class of M(G)M(G) and F(M(G))F(M(G)), where F(M(G))F(M(G)) denotes the Fitting subgroup of M(G)M(G). We prove some conditional results regarding the nilpotency class of M(G)M(G).

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.