Source author record

Mahesh Pal

Mahesh Pal appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Computer Vision Machine Learning

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2021arXiv

SAR and Optical data fusion based on Anisotropic Diffusion with PCA and Classification using Patch-based with LBP

SAR (VV and VH polarization) and optical data are widely used in image fusion to use the complimentary information of each other and to obtain the better-quality image (in terms of spatial and spectral features) for the improved classification results. This paper uses anisotropic diffusion with PCA for the fusion of SAR and optical data and patch-based SVM Classification with LBP (LBP-PSVM). Fusion results with VV polarization performed better than VH polarization using considered fusion method. For classification, the performance of LBP-PSVM using S1 (VV) with S2, S1 (VH) with S2 is compared with SVM classifier (without patch) and PSVM classifier (with patch), respectively. Classification results suggests that the LBP-PSVM classifier is more effective in comparison to SVM and PSVM classifiers for considered data.

preprint2020arXiv

Patch Based Classification of Remote Sensing Data: A Comparison of 2D-CNN, SVM and NN Classifiers

Pixel based algorithms including back propagation neural networks (NN) and support vector machines (SVM) have been widely used for remotely sensed image classifications. Within last few years, deep learning based image classifier like convolution neural networks (2D-CNN) are becoming popular alternatives to these classifiers. In this paper, we compare performance of patch based SVM and NN with that of a deep learning algorithms comprising of 2D-CNN and fully connected layers. Similar to CNN which utilise image patches to derive features for further classification, we propose to use patches as an input in place of individual pixel with both SVM and NN classifiers. Two datasets, one multispectral and other hyperspectral data was used to compare the performance of different classifiers. Results with both datasets suggest the effectiveness of patch based SVM and NN classifiers in comparison to state of art 2D-CNN classifier.

preprint2011arXiv

Support vector machines/relevance vector machine for remote sensing classification: A review

Kernel-based machine learning algorithms are based on mapping data from the original input feature space to a kernel feature space of higher dimensionality to solve a linear problem in that space. Over the last decade, kernel based classification and regression approaches such as support vector machines have widely been used in remote sensing as well as in various civil engineering applications. In spite of their better performance with different datasets, support vector machines still suffer from shortcomings such as visualization/interpretation of model, choice of kernel and kernel specific parameter as well as the regularization parameter. Relevance vector machines are another kernel based approach being explored for classification and regression with in last few years. The advantages of the relevance vector machines over the support vector machines is the availability of probabilistic predictions, using arbitrary kernel functions and not requiring setting of the regularization parameter. This paper presents a state-of-the-art review of SVM and RVM in remote sensing and provides some details of their use in other civil engineering application also.