BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Magdalena Murawska

Magdalena Murawska contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Applicationsmath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Dynamic Predictions with Time-Dependent Covariates in Survival Analysis using Joint Modeling and Landmarking

A key question in clinical practice is accurate prediction of patient prognosis. To this end, nowadays, physicians have at their disposal a variety of tests and biomarkers to aid them in optimizing medical care. These tests are often performed on a regular basis in order to closely follow the progression of the disease. In this setting it is of medical interest to optimally utilize the recorded information and provide medically-relevant summary measures, such as survival probabilities, that will aid in decision making. In this work we present and compare two statistical techniques that provide dynamically-updated estimates of survival probabilities, namely landmark analysis and joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data. Special attention is given to the functional form linking the longitudinal and event time processes, and to measures of discrimination and calibration in the context of dynamic prediction.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Asymptotic Bayes optimality under sparsity for generally distributed effect sizes under the alternative

Recent results concerning asymptotic Bayes-optimality under sparsity (ABOS) of multiple testing procedures are extended to fairly generally distributed effect sizes under the alternative. An asymptotic framework is considered where both the number of tests m and the sample size m go to infinity, while the fraction p of true alternatives converges to zero. It is shown that under mild restrictions on the loss function nontrivial asymptotic inference is possible only if n increases to infinity at least at the rate of log m. Based on this assumption precise conditions are given under which the Bonferroni correction with nominal Family Wise Error Rate (FWER) level alpha and the Benjamini- Hochberg procedure (BH) at FDR level alpha are asymptotically optimal. When n is proportional to log m then alpha can remain fixed, whereas when n increases to infinity at a quicker rate, then alpha has to converge to zero roughly like n^(-1/2). Under these conditions the Bonferroni correction is ABOS in case of extreme sparsity, while BH adapts well to the unknown level of sparsity. In the second part of this article these optimality results are carried over to model selection in the context of multiple regression with orthogonal regressors. Several modifications of Bayesian Information Criterion are considered, controlling either FWER or FDR, and conditions are provided under which these selection criteria are ABOS. Finally the performance of these criteria is examined in a brief simulation study.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access