BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Mael Sachine

Mael Sachine appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.OC

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On strong second-order optimality conditions under relaxed constant rank constraint qualification

We discuss the (first- and second-order) optimality conditions for nonlinear programming under the relaxed constant rank constraint qualification. This condition generalizes the so-called linear independence constraint qualification. Although the optimality conditions are well established in the literature, the proofs presented here are based solely on the well-known inverse function theorem. This is the only prerequisite from real analysis used to establish two auxiliary results needed to prove the optimality conditions, thereby making this paper totally self-contained.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A sequential optimality condition for Mathematical Programs with Cardinality Constraints

In this paper we propose an Approximate Weak stationarity ($AW$-stationarity) concept designed to deal with {\em Mathematical Programs with Cardinality Constraints} (MPCaC), and we proved that it is a legitimate optimality condition independently of any constraint qualification. Such a sequential optimality condition improves weaker stationarity conditions, presented in a previous work. Many research on sequential optimality conditions has been addressed for nonlinear constrained optimization in the last few years, some works in the context of MPCC and, as far as we know, no sequential optimality condition has been proposed for MPCaC problems. We also establish some relationships between our $AW$-stationarity and other usual sequential optimality conditions, such as AKKT, CAKKT and PAKKT. We point out that, despite the computational appeal of the sequential optimality conditions, in this work we are not concerned with algorithmic consequences. Our aim is purely to discuss theoretical aspects of such conditions for MPCaC problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On the weak stationarity conditions for Mathematical Programs with Cardinality Constraints: a unified approach

In this paper, we study a class of optimization problems, called Mathematical Programs with Cardinality Constraints (MPCaC). This kind of problem is generally difficult to deal with, because it involves a constraint that is not continuous neither convex, but provides sparse solutions. Thereby we reformulate MPCaC in a suitable way, by modeling it as mixed-integer problem and then addressing its continuous counterpart, which will be referred to as relaxed problem. We investigate the relaxed problem by analyzing the classical constraints in two cases: linear and nonlinear. In the linear case, we propose a general approach and present a discussion of the Guignard and Abadie constraint qualifications, proving in this case that every minimizer of the relaxed problem satisfies the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions. On the other hand, in the nonlinear case, we show that some standard constraint qualifications may be violated. Therefore, we cannot assert about KKT points. Motivated to find a minimizer for the MPCaC problem, we define new and weaker stationarity conditions, by proposing a unified approach that goes from the weakest to the strongest stationarity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access