Source author record

Evelin H. M. Krulikovski

Evelin H. M. Krulikovski appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A low-cost alternating projection approach for a continuous formulation of convex and cardinality constrained optimization

We consider convex constrained optimization problems that also include a cardinality constraint. In general, optimization problems with cardinality constraints are difficult mathematical programs which are usually solved by global techniques from discrete optimization. We assume that the region defined by the convex constraints can be written as the intersection of a finite collection of convex sets, such that it is easy and inexpensive to project onto each one of them (e.g., boxes, hyper-planes, or half-spaces). Taking advantage of a recently developed continuous reformulation that relaxes the cardinality constraint, we propose a specialized penalty gradient projection scheme combined with alternating projection ideas to solve these problems. To illustrate the combined scheme, we focus on the standard mean-variance portfolio optimization problem for which we can only invest in a preestablished limited number of assets. For these portfolio problems with cardinality constraints we present a numerical study on a variety of data sets involving real-world capital market indices from major stock markets. On those data sets we illustrate the computational performance of the proposed scheme to produce the effective frontiers for different values of the limited number of allowed assets.

preprint2020arXiv

A sequential optimality condition for Mathematical Programs with Cardinality Constraints

In this paper we propose an Approximate Weak stationarity ($AW$-stationarity) concept designed to deal with {\em Mathematical Programs with Cardinality Constraints} (MPCaC), and we proved that it is a legitimate optimality condition independently of any constraint qualification. Such a sequential optimality condition improves weaker stationarity conditions, presented in a previous work. Many research on sequential optimality conditions has been addressed for nonlinear constrained optimization in the last few years, some works in the context of MPCC and, as far as we know, no sequential optimality condition has been proposed for MPCaC problems. We also establish some relationships between our $AW$-stationarity and other usual sequential optimality conditions, such as AKKT, CAKKT and PAKKT. We point out that, despite the computational appeal of the sequential optimality conditions, in this work we are not concerned with algorithmic consequences. Our aim is purely to discuss theoretical aspects of such conditions for MPCaC problems.

preprint2020arXiv

On the weak stationarity conditions for Mathematical Programs with Cardinality Constraints: a unified approach

In this paper, we study a class of optimization problems, called Mathematical Programs with Cardinality Constraints (MPCaC). This kind of problem is generally difficult to deal with, because it involves a constraint that is not continuous neither convex, but provides sparse solutions. Thereby we reformulate MPCaC in a suitable way, by modeling it as mixed-integer problem and then addressing its continuous counterpart, which will be referred to as relaxed problem. We investigate the relaxed problem by analyzing the classical constraints in two cases: linear and nonlinear. In the linear case, we propose a general approach and present a discussion of the Guignard and Abadie constraint qualifications, proving in this case that every minimizer of the relaxed problem satisfies the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions. On the other hand, in the nonlinear case, we show that some standard constraint qualifications may be violated. Therefore, we cannot assert about KKT points. Motivated to find a minimizer for the MPCaC problem, we define new and weaker stationarity conditions, by proposing a unified approach that goes from the weakest to the strongest stationarity.