BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

M. Ramish Ashraf

M. Ramish Ashraf appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
physics.med-phphysics.acc-phphysics.ins-det

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Comparing fast imaging techniques for individual pulse imaging by Cherenkov in vivo from electron FLASH irradiation

Objective: In this study, a fast imaging technique was developed for the first in vivo Cherenkov emission imaging from an ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron beam source at single pulse (360 Hz) submillimeter resolution. Approach: A CMOS camera, gated to the UHDR LINAC, imaged the Cherenkov emission profiles pulse by pulse passively during the irradiation of mice on their limbs and intestinal region. The utility of an intensifier was investigated for its effect on image quality including signal to noise and spatial resolution. Pulse by pulse variability in Cherenkov emission profile were quantified spatially and temporally. Main results: An intensifier improved the emission profile signal to noise ratio from 15 to 280, with reduced spatial resolution. The profile extended beyond of the treatment field due to the lateral scattering of the electrons in tissue and its optical properties. The CMOS camera with an intensifier detected the changes in Cherenkov emission profile during expiration and inspiration of the respiration cycle for the mice to be about 3 mm. Significance: This fast imaging technique can be utilized for in vivo intrafraction monitoring of FLASH patient treatments at single pulse resolution. It can display delivery differences during respiration, and variability in the delivered treatment's surface profile, which may perturb from the intended UHDR treatment more for pencil beam scanning systems. The technique may leverage Cherenkov emission surface profile to gate the treatment delivery via respiratory gating systems under FLASH conditions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Electron FLASH Delivery at Treatment Room Isocenter for Efficient Reversible Conversion of a Clinical LINAC

Purpose: In this study, procedures were developed to achieve efficient reversible conversion of a clinical linear accelerator (LINAC) and deliver electron FLASH (eFLASH) or conventional beams to the treatment room isocenter. Material & Methods: The LINAC was converted to deliver eFLASH beam within 20 minutes by retracting the x-ray target from the beam's path, positioning the carousel on an empty port, and selecting 10 MV photon beam energy in the treatment console. Dose per pulse and average dose rate were measured in a solid water phantom at different depths with Gafchromic film and OSLD. A pulse controller counted the pulses via scattered radiation signal and gated the delivery for preset pulse count. A fast photomultiplier tube-based Cherenkov detector measured per pulse beam output at 2 ns sampling rate. After conversion back to clinical mode, conventional beam output, flatness, symmetry, field size and energy were measured for all clinically commissioned energies. Results: Dose per pulse of 0.86 +/- 0.01 Gy (310 +/- 7 Gy/s average dose rate) were achieved at isocenter. The dose from simultaneous irradiation of film and OSLD were within 1%. The PMT showed the LINAC required about 5 pulses before the output stabilized and its long-term stability was within 3% for measurements performed at 3 minutes intervals. The dose, flatness, symmetry, and photon energy were unchanged from baseline and within tolerance (1%, 3%, 2%, and 0.1% respectively) after reverting to conventional beams. Conclusion: 10 MeV FLASH beams were achieved at the isocenter of the treatment room. The beam output was reproducible but requires further investigation of the ramp up time in the first 5 pulses, equivalent to <100 cGy. The eFLASH beam can irradiate both small and large subjects in minimally modified clinical settings and dose rates can be further increased by reducing the source to surface distance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Individual Pulse Monitoring and Dose Control System for Pre-Clinical Implementation of FLASH-RT

Ultra-high dose rate electron sources require dose rate independent dosimeters and a calibrated dose control system for accurate delivery. In this study, we developed a single-pulse dose monitoring and a real-time dose-based control system for a converted clinical linear accelerator (LINAC). A point scintillator detector was coupled to a gated amplifier and a real-time controller for dose monitoring and feedback control loop. The controller was programmed to integrate dose and measure pulse width of each radiation pulse and gate the LINAC beam when the prescribed dose was delivered. The scintillator was mounted in solid water phantom and placed underneath mice skin for in vivo dose monitoring. Additionally, the scintillator was characterized in terms of its radiation stability, mean dose-rate, and dose per pulse dependence. Dose integration was performed for each radiation pulse and displayed in real-time. The scintillator was shown to be linear with mean dose-rate (40-380 Gy/s) and dose per pulse (0.3-1.3 Gy/Pulse) to within +/- 3%. However, the plastic scintillator was subject to significant radiation damage (16%/kGy) and would need to be calibrated frequently. Pulse-counting control was accurately implemented with direct correspondence between the intended and the actual delivered pulses. The dose-based control was sufficient to gate on any pulse of the LINAC. In-vivo dosimetry monitoring with a 1 cm circular cut-out revealed that a ramp-up of 4-5 pulses was present during which the average dose per pulse was ~0.045 +/- 0.004 Gy/Pulse, whereas after the ramp-up it stabilized at 0.65 +/- 0.01 Gy/Pulse. The tools presented in this study can be used to determine the beam parameter space pertinent to the FLASH effect. Additionally, this study is the first instance of real-time dose-based control for a modified LINAC at ultra-high dose rates.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Treatment Planning System for Electron FLASH Radiotherapy: Open-source for Clinical Implementation

Purpose: A Monte Carlo (MC) beam model and its implementation in a clinical treatment planning system (TPS, Varian Eclipse) are presented for a modified ultra-high dose-rate electron FLASH radiotherapy (eFLASH-RT) LINAC. Methods: The gantry head without scattering foils or targets, representative of the LINAC modifications, was modelled in Geant4. The energy spectrum (σE) and beam source emittance cone angle (θcone) were varied to match the calculated and Gafchromic film measured central-axis percent depth dose (PDD) and lateral profiles. Its Eclipse configuration was validated with measured profiles of the open field and nominal fields for clinical applicators. eFLASH-RT plans were MC forward calculated in Geant4 for a mouse brain treatment and compared to a conventional (Conv-RT) plan in Eclipse for a human patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Results: The beam model and its Eclipse configuration agreed best with measurements at σE=0.5 MeV and θcone=3.9+/-0.2 degrees to clinically acceptable accuracy (the absolute average error was within 1.5% for in-water lateral, 3% for in-air lateral, and 2% for PDD). The forward dose calculation showed dose was delivered to the entire mouse brain with adequate conformality. The human patient case demonstrated the planning capability with routine accessories in relatively complex geometry to achieve an acceptable plan (90% of the tumor volume receiving 95% and 90% of the prescribed dose for eFLASH and Conv-RT, respectively). Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first functional beam model commissioned in a clinical TPS for eFLASH-RT, enabling planning and evaluation with minimal deviation from Conv-RT workflow. It facilitates the clinical translation as eFLASH-RT and Conv-RT plan quality were comparable for a human patient. The methods can be expanded to model other eFLASH irradiators.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access