BZPEER
More

Discover

About BZPEERSearchGraph

Research tools

HomeCollectionsResearchCollaborationPublish

Network

ExpertsCommunities

Opportunities

Listings

Account

Log inCreate account
Log inCreate account

Source author record

M. Abadi

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.DSNeurons and Cognitionnlin.AO

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse papers

Published work

2 publications

preprint2022arXiv

The complete LqL^q-spectrum and large deviations for return times for equilibrium states with summable potentials

Let (Xk)k≥0(X_k)_{k\geq 0} be a stationary and ergodic process with joint distribution μμ where the random variables XkX_k take values in a finite set A\mathcal{A}. Let RnR_n be the first time this process repeats its first nn symbols of output. It is well-known that 1nlog⁡Rn\frac{1}{n}\log R_n converges almost surely to the entropy of the process. Refined properties of RnR_n (large deviations, multifractality, etc) are encoded in the return-time LqL^q-spectrum defined as R(q)=lim⁡n1nlog⁡∫Rnq dμ(q∈R) \mathcal{R}(q)=\lim_n\frac{1}{n}\log\int R_n^q \,dμ\quad (q\in\mathbb{R}) provided the limit exists. We consider the case where (Xk)k≥0(X_k)_{k\geq 0} is distributed according to the equilibrium state of a potential φ:AN→Rφ:\mathcal{A}^{\mathbb{N}}\to\mathbb{R} with summable variation, and we prove that R(q)={P((1−q)φ)for    q≥qφ∗sup⁡η∫φ dηfor    q<qφ∗ \mathcal{R}(q) = \begin{cases} P((1-q)φ) & \text{for}\;\; q\geq q_φ^*\\ \sup_η\int φ\, dη& \text{for}\;\; q<q_φ^{*} \end{cases} where P((1−q)φ)P((1-q)φ) is the topological pressure of (1−q)φ(1-q)φ, the supremum is taken over all shift-invariant measures, and qφ∗q_φ^* is the unique solution of P((1−q)φ)=sup⁡η∫φ dηP((1-q)φ) =\sup_η\int φ\, dη. Unexpectedly, this spectrum does not coincide with the LqL^q-spectrum of μφμ_φ, which is P((1−q)φ)P((1-q)φ), and does not coincide with the waiting-time LqL^q-spectrum in general. In fact, the return-time LqL^q-spectrum coincides with the waiting-time LqL^q-spectrum if and only if the equilibrium state of φφ is the measure of maximal entropy. As a by-product, we also improve the large deviation asymptotics of 1nlog⁡Rn\frac{1}{n}\log R_n.

Open access
preprint2016arXiv

Phase transitions and self-organized criticality in networks of stochastic spiking neurons

Phase transitions and critical behavior are crucial issues both in theoretical and experimental neuroscience. We report analytic and computational results about phase transitions and self-organized criticality (SOC) in networks with general stochastic neurons. The stochastic neuron has a firing probability given by a smooth monotonic function Φ(V)Φ(V) of the membrane potential VV, rather than a sharp firing threshold. We find that such networks can operate in several dynamic regimes (phases) depending on the average synaptic weight and the shape of the firing function ΦΦ. In particular, we encounter both continuous and discontinuous phase transitions to absorbing states. At the continuous transition critical boundary, neuronal avalanches occur whose distributions of size and duration are given by power laws, as observed in biological neural networks. We also propose and test a new mechanism to produce SOC: the use of dynamic neuronal gains -- a form of short-term plasticity probably in the axon initial segment (AIS) -- instead of depressing synapses at the dendrites (as previously studied in the literature). The new self-organization mechanism produces a slightly supercritical state, that we called SOSC, in accord to some intuitions of Alan Turing.

Open access

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.