BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Lukáš Krasula

Lukáš Krasula contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
eess.IVComputer VisionMultimediaMachine LearningNeurons and Cognition

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Banding vs. Quality: Perceptual Impact and Objective Assessment

Staircase-like contours introduced to a video by quantization in flat areas, commonly known as banding, have been a long-standing problem in both video processing and quality assessment communities. The fact that even a relatively small change of the original pixel values can result in a strong impact on perceived quality makes banding especially difficult to be detected by objective quality metrics. In this paper, we study how banding annoyance compares to more commonly studied scaling and compression artifacts with respect to the overall perceptual quality. We further propose a simple combination of VMAF and the recently developed banding index, CAMBI, into a banding-aware video quality metric showing improved correlation with overall perceived quality.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Estimating the Resize Parameter in End-to-end Learned Image Compression

We describe a search-free resizing framework that can further improve the rate-distortion tradeoff of recent learned image compression models. Our approach is simple: compose a pair of differentiable downsampling/upsampling layers that sandwich a neural compression model. To determine resize factors for different inputs, we utilize another neural network jointly trained with the compression model, with the end goal of minimizing the rate-distortion objective. Our results suggest that "compression friendly" downsampled representations can be quickly determined during encoding by using an auxiliary network and differentiable image warping. By conducting extensive experimental tests on existing deep image compression models, we show results that our new resizing parameter estimation framework can provide Bjøntegaard-Delta rate (BD-rate) improvement of about 10% against leading perceptual quality engines. We also carried out a subjective quality study, the results of which show that our new approach yields favorable compressed images. To facilitate reproducible research in this direction, the implementation used in this paper is being made freely available online at: https://github.com/treammm/ResizeCompression.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Improving Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling method to measure inter content scale

The goal of most subjective studies is to place a set of stimuli on a perceptual scale. This is mostly done directly by rating, e.g. using single or double stimulus methodologies, or indirectly by ranking or pairwise comparison. All these methods estimate the perceptual magnitudes of the stimuli on a scale. However, procedures such as Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling (MLDS) have shown that considering perceptual distances can bring benefits in terms of discriminatory power, observers' cognitive load, and the number of trials required. One of the disadvantages of the MLDS method is that the perceptual scales obtained for stimuli created from different source content are generally not comparable. In this paper, we propose an extension of the MLDS method that ensures inter-content comparability of the results and shows its usefulness especially in the presence of observer errors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Ambiguity of Objective Image Quality Metrics: A New Methodology for Performance Evaluation

Objective image quality metrics try to estimate the perceptual quality of the given image by considering the characteristics of the human visual system. However, it is possible that the metrics produce different quality scores even for two images that are perceptually indistinguishable by human viewers, which have not been considered in the existing studies related to objective quality assessment. In this paper, we address the issue of ambiguity of objective image quality assessment. We propose an approach to obtain an ambiguity interval of an objective metric, within which the quality score difference is not perceptually significant. In particular, we use the visual difference predictor, which can consider viewing conditions that are important for visual quality perception. In order to demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed approach, we conduct experiments with 33 state-of-the-art image quality metrics in the viewpoint of their accuracy and ambiguity for three image quality databases. The results show that the ambiguity intervals can be applied as an additional figure of merit when conventional performance measurement does not determine superiority between the metrics. The effect of the viewing distance on the ambiguity interval is also shown.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

CAMBI: Contrast-aware Multiscale Banding Index

Banding artifacts are artificially-introduced contours arising from the quantization of a smooth region in a video. Despite the advent of recent higher quality video systems with more efficient codecs, these artifacts remain conspicuous, especially on larger displays. In this work, a comprehensive subjective study is performed to understand the dependence of the banding visibility on encoding parameters and dithering. We subsequently develop a simple and intuitive no-reference banding index called CAMBI (Contrast-aware Multiscale Banding Index) which uses insights from Contrast Sensitivity Function in the Human Visual System to predict banding visibility. CAMBI correlates well with subjective perception of banding while using only a few visually-motivated hyperparameters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access