BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Luís Cruz-Filipe

Luís Cruz-Filipe contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsLogic in Computer ScienceProgramming LanguagesDiscrete MathematicsArtificial IntelligenceComputational Complexity

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - Emerging
10works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

FÆRDXEL: An Expert System for Danish Traffic Law

We present FÆRDXEL, a tool for symbolic reasoning in the domain of Danish traffic law. FÆRDXEL combines techniques from logic programming with a novel interface that allows users to navigate through its reasoning process, thereby ensuring the system's explainability. Towards the goal of better understanding the value of FÆRDXEL, two evaluations of the system have been performed: (1) An empirical evaluation showing that for a selection of court cases, the conclusions of FÆRDXEL align with those of Danish judges. (2) A qualitative evaluation from legal experts indicating that this work has potential to become a foundation for real-world AI tools supporting professionals in the Danish legal sector.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

From Infinity to Choreographies: Extraction for Unbounded Systems

Choreographies are formal descriptions of distributed systems, which focus on the way in which participants communicate. While they are useful for analysing protocols, in practice systems are written directly by specifying each participant's behaviour. This created the need for choreography extraction: the process of obtaining a choreography that faithfully describes the collective behaviour of all participants in a distributed protocol. Previous works have addressed this problem for systems with a predefined, finite number of participants. In this work, we show how to extract choreographies from system descriptions where the total number of participants is unknown and unbounded, due to the ability of spawning new processes at runtime. This extension is challenging, since previous algorithms relied heavily on the set of possible states of the network during execution being finite.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Functional Choreographic Programming

Choreographic programming is an emerging programming paradigm for concurrent and distributed systems, whereby developers write the communications that should be enacted and then a distributed implementation is automatically obtained by means of a compiler. Theories of choreographic programming typically come with strong theoretical guarantees about the compilation process, most notably: the generated implementations operationally correspond to their source choreographies and are deadlock-free. Currently, the most advanced incarnation of the paradigm is Choral, an object-oriented choreographic programming language that targets Java. Choral deviated significantly from known theories of choreographies, and introduced the possibility of expressing higher-order choreographies (choreographies parameterised over choreographies) that are fully distributed. As a consequence, it is unclear if the usual guarantees of choreographies can still hold in the more general setting of higher-order ones. We introduce Chorλ, the first functional choreographic programming language: it introduces a new formulation of the standard communication primitive found in choreographies as a function, and it is based upon the λ-calculus. Chorλ is the first theory that explains the core ideas of higher-order choreographic programming (as in Choral). Bridging the gap between practice and theory requires developing a new evaluation strategy and typing discipline for λ terms that accounts for the distributed nature of computation in choreographies. We illustrate the expressivity of Chorλ with a series of examples, which include reconstructions of the key examples from the original presentation of Choral. Our theory supports the expected properties of choreographic programming and bridges the gap between the communities of functional and choreographic programming.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Formalising a Turing-Complete Choreographic Language in Coq

Theory of choreographic languages typically includes a number of complex results that are proved by structural induction. The high number of cases and the subtle details in some of them lead to long reviewing processes, and occasionally to errors being found in published proofs. In this work, we take a published proof of Turing completeness of a choreographic language and formalise it in Coq. Our development includes formalising the choreographic language and its basic properties, Kleene's theory of partial recursive functions, the encoding of these functions as choreographies, and proving this encoding correct. With this effort, we show that theorem proving can be a very useful tool in the field of choreographic languages: besides the added degree of confidence that we get from a mechanised proof, the formalisation process led us to a significant simplification of the underlying theory. Our results offer a foundation for the future formal development of choreographic languages.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Formalizing Size-Optimal Sorting Networks: Extracting a Certified Proof Checker

Since the proof of the four color theorem in 1976, computer-generated proofs have become a reality in mathematics and computer science. During the last decade, we have seen formal proofs using verified proof assistants being used to verify the validity of such proofs. In this paper, we describe a formalized theory of size-optimal sorting networks. From this formalization we extract a certified checker that successfully verifies computer-generated proofs of optimality on up to 8 inputs. The checker relies on an untrusted oracle to shortcut the search for witnesses on more than 1.6 million NP-complete subproblems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Optimizing a Certified Proof Checker for a Large-Scale Computer-Generated Proof

In recent work, we formalized the theory of optimal-size sorting networks with the goal of extracting a verified checker for the large-scale computer-generated proof that 25 comparisons are optimal when sorting 9 inputs, which required more than a decade of CPU time and produced 27 GB of proof witnesses. The checker uses an untrusted oracle based on these witnesses and is able to verify the smaller case of 8 inputs within a couple of days, but it did not scale to the full proof for 9 inputs. In this paper, we describe several non-trivial optimizations of the algorithm in the checker, obtained by appropriately changing the formalization and capitalizing on the symbiosis with an adequate implementation of the oracle. We provide experimental evidence of orders of magnitude improvements to both runtime and memory footprint for 8 inputs, and actually manage to check the full proof for 9 inputs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Optimal-Depth Sorting Networks

We solve a 40-year-old open problem on the depth optimality of sorting networks. In 1973, Donald E. Knuth detailed, in Volume 3 of &#34;The Art of Computer Programming&#34;, sorting networks of the smallest depth known at the time for n =< 16 inputs, quoting optimality for n =< 8. In 1989, Parberry proved the optimality of the networks with 9 =< n =< 10 inputs. In this article, we present a general technique for obtaining such optimality results, and use it to prove the optimality of the remaining open cases of 11 =< n =< 16 inputs. We show how to exploit symmetry to construct a small set of two-layer networks on n inputs such that if there is a sorting network on n inputs of a given depth, then there is one whose first layers are in this set. For each network in the resulting set, we construct a propositional formula whose satisfiability is necessary for the existence of a sorting network of a given depth. Using an off-the-shelf SAT solver we show that the sorting networks listed by Knuth are optimal. For n =< 10 inputs, our algorithm is orders of magnitude faster than the prior ones.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Sorting Networks: the End Game

This paper studies properties of the back end of a sorting network and illustrates the utility of these in the search for networks of optimal size or depth. All previous works focus on properties of the front end of networks and on how to apply these to break symmetries in the search. The new properties help shed understanding on how sorting networks sort and speed-up solvers for both optimal size and depth by an order of magnitude.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Twenty-Five Comparators is Optimal when Sorting Nine Inputs (and Twenty-Nine for Ten)

This paper describes a computer-assisted non-existence proof of nine-input sorting networks consisting of 24 comparators, hence showing that the 25-comparator sorting network found by Floyd in 1964 is optimal. As a corollary, we obtain that the 29-comparator network found by Waksman in 1969 is optimal when sorting ten inputs. This closes the two smallest open instances of the optimal size sorting network problem, which have been open since the results of Floyd and Knuth from 1966 proving optimality for sorting networks of up to eight inputs. The proof involves a combination of two methodologies: one based on exploiting the abundance of symmetries in sorting networks, and the other, based on an encoding of the problem to that of satisfiability of propositional logic. We illustrate that, while each of these can single handed solve smaller instances of the problem, it is their combination which leads to an efficient solution for nine inputs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access