Researcher profile

Ludmila Scharf

Ludmila Scharf contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - Baseline
2works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

Computation of the Hausdorff distance between sets of line segments in parallel

We show that the Hausdorff distance for two sets of non-intersecting line segments can be computed in parallel in $O(\log^2 n)$ time using O(n) processors in a CREW-PRAM computation model. We discuss how some parts of the sequential algorithm can be performed in parallel using previously known parallel algorithms; and identify the so-far unsolved part of the problem for the parallel computation, which is the following: Given two sets of $x$-monotone curve segments, red and blue, for each red segment find its extremal intersection points with the blue set, i.e. points with the minimal and maximal $x$-coordinate. Each segment set is assumed to be intersection free. For this intersection problem we describe a parallel algorithm which completes the Hausdorff distance computation within the stated time and processor bounds.

preprint2012arXiv

Empty pentagons in point sets with collinearities

An empty pentagon in a point set P in the plane is a set of five points in P in strictly convex position with no other point of P in their convex hull. We prove that every finite set of at least 328k^2 points in the plane contains an empty pentagon or k collinear points. This is optimal up to a constant factor since the (k-1)x(k-1) grid contains no empty pentagon and no k collinear points. The previous best known bound was doubly exponential.