Source author record

Ludmila I. Kuncheva

Ludmila I. Kuncheva appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Basic Ensembles of Vanilla-Style Deep Learning Models Improve Liver Segmentation From CT Images

Segmentation of the liver from 3D computer tomography (CT) images is one of the most frequently performed operations in medical image analysis. In the past decade, Deep Learning Models (DMs) have offered significant improvements over previous methods for liver segmentation. The success of DMs is usually owed to the user's expertise in deep learning as well as to intricate training procedures. The need for bespoke expertise limits the reproducibility of empirical studies involving DMs. Today's consensus is that an ensemble of DMs works better than the individual component DMs. In this study we set off to explore the potential of ensembles of publicly available, `vanilla-style' DM segmenters Our ensembles were created from four off-the-shelf DMs: U-Net, Deepmedic, V-Net, and Dense V-Networks. To prevent further overfitting and to keep the overall model simple, we use basic non-trainable ensemble combiners: majority vote, average, product and min/max. Our results with two publicly available data sets (CHAOS and 3Dircadb1) demonstrate that ensembles are significantly better than the individual segmenters on four widely used metrics.

preprint2020arXiv

Feature Selection from High-Dimensional Data with Very Low Sample Size: A Cautionary Tale

In classification problems, the purpose of feature selection is to identify a small, highly discriminative subset of the original feature set. In many applications, the dataset may have thousands of features and only a few dozens of samples (sometimes termed `wide'). This study is a cautionary tale demonstrating why feature selection in such cases may lead to undesirable results. In view to highlight the sample size issue, we derive the required sample size for declaring two features different. Using an example, we illustrate the heavy dependency between feature set and classifier, which poses a question to classifier-agnostic feature selection methods. However, the choice of a good selector-classifier pair is hampered by the low correlation between estimated and true error rate, as illustrated by another example. While previous studies raising similar issues validate their message with mostly synthetic data, here we carried out an experiment with 20 real datasets. We created an exaggerated scenario whereby we cut a very small portion of the data (10 instances per class) for feature selection and used the rest of the data for testing. The results reinforce the caution and suggest that it may be better to refrain from feature selection from very wide datasets rather than return misleading output to the user.