Researcher profile

Louis Archambault

Louis Archambault contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

On the use of machine learning methods for mPSD calibration in HDR brachytherapy

Purpose: We sought to evaluate the feasibility of using machine learning algorithms for multipoint plastic scintillator detector calibration in high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Methods: The dosimetry system consisted of an optimized 1-mm-core mPSD and a compact assembly of photomultiplier tubes coupled with dichroic mirrors and filters. An $^{192}$Ir source was remotely controlled and sent to various positions in a homemade PMMA holder. Dose measurements covering a range of 0.5 to 12 cm of source displacement were carried out according to TG-43 recommendations. Individual scintillator doses were decoupled using a linear regression model, a random forest estimator, and artificial neural network algorithms. The performance of the different algorithms was evaluated using different sample sizes and distances to the source for the mPSD system calibration. Results: The decoupling methods' deviations from the expected TG-43 dose generally remained below 20%. However, the dose prediction with the three algorithms was accurate to within 7% relative to the dose predicted by the TG-43 formalism for measurements performed in the same range of distances used for calibration. The performance random forest was compromised when the predictions were done beyond the range of distances used for calibration. The dose prediction by the linear regression was less influenced by the calibration conditions than random forest, but with more significant deviations. The number of available measurements for training purposes influenced the random forest and neural network models the most. Their accuracy tended to converge toward deviation values close to 1% from a number of dwell positions greater than 100. Conclusions: In performing HDR brachytherapy dose measurements with an optimized mPSD system, ML algorithms are good alternatives for precise dose reporting and treatment assessment.

preprint2019arXiv

Dosimetric performance of a multi-point plastic scintillator dosimeter as a tool for real-time source tracking in high dose rate brachytherapy

Purpose: To present the performance of a multi-point plastic scintillation detector (mPSD) as a tool in vivo dosimetry in brachytherapy. Methods: A previously optimized three-point sensor system was used for in vivo HDR brachytherapy measurements (using the scintillators BCF-60, BCF-12, and BCF-10). The light detection system of the mPSD consisted of compactly assembled photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) and dichroic mirrors and filters to achieve a highly sensitive scintillation light collection. The PMT signals were recorded using a NI-DAQ board at a rate of 100 kHz. Dose measurements covering a range of 0.5 to 10 cm from the 192Ir source were carried out according to TG-43 U1 recommendations in order to: (1) characterize the system's response in terms of angular dependence; (2) obtain the relative contribution of positioning and measurement uncertainties to the total system uncertainty; (3) assess the system's temporal resolution; and (4) track the source position in real time. Results: The positioning uncertainty dominated close to the source, whereas the measurement uncertainty dominated at larger distances. A maximum measurement uncertainty of 17 % was observed for the BCF-60 scintillator at 10 cm from the source. The average best compromise between positioning and measurement uncertainties were reached at 17.4 mm. The detector further exhibited no angular dependence. The system provided an average location with a standard deviation under 1.7 mm. The maximum observed differences between measured and expected source location was 1.82 mm. Dose deviations remained below 5% in all the explored measurement conditions. With regard to dwell time measurement accuracy, the maximum deviation observed at all distances was 0.56 s. Conclusions: The performance of the system demonstrated that it could be used for real-time dose, position and dwell time measurements during HDR brachytherapy.