BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Lorenzo Galeotti

Lorenzo Galeotti contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.LO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Randomising Realisability

We consider a randomised version of Kleene's realisability interpretation of intuitionistic arithmetic in which computability is replaced with randomised computability with positive probability. In particular, we show that (i) the set of randomly realisable statements is closed under intuitionistic first-order logic, but (ii) different from the set of realisable statements, that (iii) "realisability with probability 1" is the same as realisability and (iv) that the axioms of bounded Heyting's arithmetic are randomly realisable, but some instances of the full induction scheme fail to be randomly realisable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Bounded Symbiosis and Upwards Reflection

Bagaria and Väänänen developed a framework for studying the large cardinal strength of downwards Löwenheim-Skolem theorems and related set theoretic reflection properties. The main tool was the notion of symbiosis, originally introduced by the third author. Symbiosis provides a way of relating model theoretic properties of strong logics to definability in set theory. In this paper we continue the systematic investigation of symbiosis and apply it to upwards Löwenheim-Skolem theorems and reflection principles. To achieve this, we need to adapt the notion of symbiosis to a new form, called bounded symbiosis. As one easy application, we obtain upper and lower bounds for the large cardinal strength of upwards Löwenheim-Skolem-type principles for second order logic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Resetting Infinite Time Blum-Shub-Smale-Machines

In this paper, we study strengthenings of Infinite Times Blum-Shub-Smale-Machines (ITBMs) that were proposed by Seyfferth in [14] and Welch in [15] obtained by modifying the behaviour of the machines at limit stages. In particular, we study Strong Infinite Times Blum-Shub-Smale-Machines (SITBMs), a variation of ITBMs where lim is substituted by lim inf in computing the content of registers at limit steps. We will provide lower bounds to the computational strength of such machines. Then, we will study the computational strength of restrictions of SITBMs whose computations have low complexity. We will provide an upper bound to the computational strength of these machines, in doing so we will strenghten a result in [15] and we will give a partial answer to a question posed by Welch in [15].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access