BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Lluis Pamies-Juarez

Lluis Pamies-Juarez contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingNetworking and Internet ArchitectureInformation Theorymath.IT

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

In-Network Redundancy Generation for Opportunistic Speedup of Backup

Erasure coding is a storage-efficient alternative to replication for achieving reliable data backup in distributed storage systems. During the storage process, traditional erasure codes require a unique source node to create and upload all the redundant data to the different storage nodes. However, such a source node may have limited communication and computation capabilities, which constrain the storage process throughput. Moreover, the source node and the different storage nodes might not be able to send and receive data simultaneously -- e.g., nodes might be busy in a datacenter setting, or simply be offline in a peer-to-peer setting -- which can further threaten the efficacy of the overall storage process. In this paper we propose an "in-network" redundancy generation process which distributes the data insertion load among the source and storage nodes by allowing the storage nodes to generate new redundant data by exchanging partial information among themselves, improving the throughput of the storage process. The process is carried out asynchronously, utilizing spare bandwidth and computing resources from the storage nodes. The proposed approach leverages on the local repairability property of newly proposed erasure codes tailor made for the needs of distributed storage systems. We analytically show that the performance of this technique relies on an efficient usage of the spare node resources, and we derive a set of scheduling algorithms to maximize the same. We experimentally show, using availability traces from real peer-to-peer applications as well as Google data center availability and workload traces, that our algorithms can, depending on the environment characteristics, increase the throughput of the storage process significantly (up to 90% in data centers, and 60% in peer-to-peer settings) with respect to the classical naive data insertion approach.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

The CORE Storage Primitive: Cross-Object Redundancy for Efficient Data Repair & Access in Erasure Coded Storage

Erasure codes are an integral part of many distributed storage systems aimed at Big Data, since they provide high fault-tolerance for low overheads. However, traditional erasure codes are inefficient on reading stored data in degraded environments (when nodes might be unavailable), and on replenishing lost data (vital for long term resilience). Consequently, novel codes optimized to cope with distributed storage system nuances are vigorously being researched. In this paper, we take an engineering alternative, exploring the use of simple and mature techniques -juxtaposing a standard erasure code with RAID-4 like parity. We carry out an analytical study to determine the efficacy of this approach over traditional as well as some novel codes. We build upon this study to design CORE, a general storage primitive that we integrate into HDFS. We benchmark this implementation in a proprietary cluster and in EC2. Our experiments show that compared to traditional erasure codes, CORE uses 50% less bandwidth and is up to 75% faster while recovering a single failed node, while the gains are respectively 15% and 60% for double node failures.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

RapidRAID: Pipelined Erasure Codes for Fast Data Archival in Distributed Storage Systems

To achieve reliability in distributed storage systems, data has usually been replicated across different nodes. However the increasing volume of data to be stored has motivated the introduction of erasure codes, a storage efficient alternative to replication, particularly suited for archival in data centers, where old datasets (rarely accessed) can be erasure encoded, while replicas are maintained only for the latest data. Many recent works consider the design of new storage-centric erasure codes for improved repairability. In contrast, this paper addresses the migration from replication to encoding: traditionally erasure coding is an atomic operation in that a single node with the whole object encodes and uploads all the encoded pieces. Although large datasets can be concurrently archived by distributing individual object encodings among different nodes, the network and computing capacity of individual nodes constrain the archival process due to such atomicity. We propose a new pipelined coding strategy that distributes the network and computing load of single-object encodings among different nodes, which also speeds up multiple object archival. We further present RapidRAID codes, an explicit family of pipelined erasure codes which provides fast archival without compromising either data reliability or storage overheads. Finally, we provide a real implementation of RapidRAID codes and benchmark its performance using both a cluster of 50 nodes and a set of Amazon EC2 instances. Experiments show that RapidRAID codes reduce a single object's coding time by up to 90%, while when multiple objects are encoded concurrently, the reduction is up to 20%.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Cost Analysis of Redundancy Schemes for Distributed Storage Systems

Distributed storage infrastructures require the use of data redundancy to achieve high data reliability. Unfortunately, the use of redundancy introduces storage and communication overheads, which can either reduce the overall storage capacity of the system or increase its costs. To mitigate the storage and communication overhead, different redundancy schemes have been proposed. However, due to the great variety of underlaying storage infrastructures and the different application needs, optimizing these redundancy schemes for each storage infrastructure is cumbersome. The lack of rules to determine the optimal level of redundancy for each storage configuration leads developers in industry to often choose simpler redundancy schemes, which are usually not the optimal ones. In this paper we analyze the cost of different redundancy schemes and derive a set of rules to determine which redundancy scheme minimizes the storage and the communication costs for a given system configuration. Additionally, we use simulation to show that theoretically-optimal schemes may not be viable in a realistic setting where nodes can go off-line and repairs may be delayed. In these cases, we identify which are the trade-offs between the storage and communication overheads of the redundancy scheme and its data reliability.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access