BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Liyao Lyu

Liyao Lyu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.NANumerical AnalysisComputer VisionMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Reproducing Activation Function for Deep Learning

We propose reproducing activation functions (RAFs) to improve deep learning accuracy for various applications ranging from computer vision to scientific computing. The idea is to employ several basic functions and their learnable linear combination to construct neuron-wise data-driven activation functions for each neuron. Armed with RAFs, neural networks (NNs) can reproduce traditional approximation tools and, therefore, approximate target functions with a smaller number of parameters than traditional NNs. In NN training, RAFs can generate neural tangent kernels (NTKs) with a better condition number than traditional activation functions lessening the spectral bias of deep learning. As demonstrated by extensive numerical tests, the proposed RAFs can facilitate the convergence of deep learning optimization for a solution with higher accuracy than existing deep learning solvers for audio/image/video reconstruction, PDEs, and eigenvalue problems. With RAFs, the errors of audio/video reconstruction, PDEs, and eigenvalue problems are decreased by over 14%, 73%, 99%, respectively, compared with baseline, while the performance of image reconstruction increases by 58%.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Enforcing exact boundary and initial conditions in the deep mixed residual method

In theory, boundary and initial conditions are important for the wellposedness of partial differential equations (PDEs). Numerically, these conditions can be enforced exactly in classical numerical methods, such as finite difference method and finite element method. Recent years have witnessed growing interests in solving PDEs by deep neural networks (DNNs), especially in the high-dimensional case. However, in the generic situation, a careful literature review shows that boundary conditions cannot be enforced exactly for DNNs, which inevitably leads to a modeling error. In this work, based on the recently developed deep mixed residual method (MIM), we demonstrate how to make DNNs satisfy boundary and initial conditions automatically in a systematic manner. As a consequence, the loss function in MIM is free of the penalty term and does not have any modeling error. Using numerous examples, including Dirichlet, Neumann, mixed, Robin, and periodic boundary conditions for elliptic equations, and initial conditions for parabolic and hyperbolic equations, we show that enforcing exact boundary and initial conditions not only provides a better approximate solution but also facilitates the training process.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

MIM: A deep mixed residual method for solving high-order partial differential equations

In recent years, a significant amount of attention has been paid to solve partial differential equations (PDEs) by deep learning. For example, deep Galerkin method (DGM) uses the PDE residual in the least-squares sense as the loss function and a deep neural network (DNN) to approximate the PDE solution. In this work, we propose a deep mixed residual method (MIM) to solve PDEs with high-order derivatives. In MIM, we first rewrite a high-order PDE into a first-order system, very much in the same spirit as local discontinuous Galerkin method and mixed finite element method in classical numerical methods for PDEs. We then use the residual of first-order system in the least-squares sense as the loss function, which is in close connection with least-squares finite element method. For aforementioned classical numerical methods, the choice of trail and test functions is important for stability and accuracy issues in many cases. MIM shares this property when DNNs are employed to approximate unknowns functions in the first-order system. In one case, we use nearly the same DNN to approximate all unknown functions and in the other case, we use totally different DNNs for different unknown functions. In most cases, MIM provides better approximations (not only for high-derivatives of the PDE solution but also for the PDE solution itself) than DGM with nearly the same DNN and the same execution time, sometimes by more than one order of magnitude. When different DNNs are used, in many cases, MIM provides even better approximations than MIM with only one DNN, sometimes by more than one order of magnitude. Therefore, we expect MIM to open up a possibly systematic way to understand and improve deep learning for solving PDEs from the perspective of classical numerical analysis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access