Researcher profile

Lino Chamorro

Lino Chamorro contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A Multi-Objective Approach for Multi-Cloud Infrastructure Brokering in Dynamic Markets

Cloud Service Brokers (CSBs) facilitate complex resource allocation decisions, efficiently mapping dynamic tenant demands onto dynamic provider offers, where several objectives should ideally be considered. This work proposes for the first time a pure multi-objective formulation of a broker-oriented Virtual Machine Placement (VMP) problem for dynamic environments, simultaneously optimizing the following objective functions: (i) Total Infrastructure CPU (TICPU), (ii) Total Infrastructure Memory (TIMEM) and (iii) Total Infrastructure Price (TIP) while considering load balancing across providers. To solve the formulated multi-objective problem, a Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm (MOEA) is proposed. Considering that each time a demand (or offer) change occurs, a set of non-dominated solutions is found by Pareto-based algorithms as the one proposed, different selection strategies were evaluated in order to automatically select a convenient solution. Additionally, the proposed algorithm, including the considered selection strategies, was compared against mono-objective state-of-the-art alternatives in different scenarios with real data from providers in actual markets. Experimental results demonstrate that a pure multi-objective optimization approach considering the preferred solution selection strategy (S3) outperformed other mono-objective evaluated alternatives.