BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Lie Meng Pang

Lie Meng Pang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Neural and Evolutionary ComputingArtificial Intelligence

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Algorithm Configurations of MOEA/D with an Unbounded External Archive

In the evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) community, it is usually assumed that the final population is presented to the decision maker as the result of the execution of an EMO algorithm. Recently, an unbounded external archive was used to evaluate the performance of EMO algorithms in some studies where a pre-specified number of solutions are selected from all the examined non-dominated solutions. In this framework, which is referred to as the solution selection framework, the final population does not have to be a good solution set. Thus, the solution selection framework offers higher flexibility to the design of EMO algorithms than the final population framework. In this paper, we examine the design of MOEA/D under these two frameworks. First, we show that the performance of MOEA/D is improved by linearly changing the reference point specification during its execution through computational experiments with various combinations of initial and final specifications. Robust and high performance of the solution selection framework is observed. Then, we examine the use of a genetic algorithm-based offline hyper-heuristic method to find the best configuration of MOEA/D in each framework. Finally, we further discuss solution selection after the execution of an EMO algorithm in the solution selection framework.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Decomposition-Based Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm Design under Two Algorithm Frameworks

The development of efficient and effective evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) algorithms has been an active research topic in the evolutionary computation community. Over the years, many EMO algorithms have been proposed. The existing EMO algorithms are mainly developed based on the final population framework. In the final population framework, the final population of an EMO algorithm is presented to the decision maker. Thus, it is required that the final population produced by an EMO algorithm is a good solution set. Recently, the use of solution selection framework was suggested for the design of EMO algorithms. This framework has an unbounded external archive to store all the examined solutions. A pre-specified number of solutions are selected from the archive as the final solutions presented to the decision maker. When the solution selection framework is used, EMO algorithms can be designed in a more flexible manner since the final population is not necessarily to be a good solution set. In this paper, we examine the design of MOEA/D under these two frameworks. We use an offline genetic algorithm-based hyper-heuristic method to find the optimal configuration of MOEA/D in each framework. The DTLZ and WFG test suites and their minus versions are used in our experiments. The experimental results suggest the possibility that a more flexible, robust and high-performance MOEA/D algorithm can be obtained when the solution selection framework is used.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Solution Subset Selection for Final Decision Making in Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization

In general, a multi-objective optimization problem does not have a single optimal solution but a set of Pareto optimal solutions, which forms the Pareto front in the objective space. Various evolutionary algorithms have been proposed to approximate the Pareto front using a pre-specified number of solutions. Hundreds of solutions are obtained by their single run. The selection of a single final solution from the obtained solutions is assumed to be done by a human decision maker. However, in many cases, the decision maker does not want to examine hundreds of solutions. Thus, it is needed to select a small subset of the obtained solutions. In this paper, we discuss subset selection from a viewpoint of the final decision making. First we briefly explain existing subset selection studies. Next we formulate an expected loss function for subset selection. We also show that the formulated function is the same as the IGD plus indicator. Then we report experimental results where the proposed approach is compared with other indicator-based subset selection methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access